skip to content
Kantian consequentialism
ClosePreview this item

Kantian consequentialism

Author: David Cummiskey
Publisher: New York : Oxford University Press, 1996.
Edition/Format:   Book : EnglishView all editions and formats
Summary:
The central issue in normative ethics hinges on the conflict between a consequentialist view - that morality requires promoting the good of all - and a Kantian view - that we should respect the rights of the individual. Kantians and non-Kantians alike have presumed that Kant's ethics is incompatible with all forms of consequentialism, and instead justifies a duty-based and agent-centered moral theory. From this
Rating:

(not yet rated) 0 with reviews - Be the first.

 

Find a copy in the library

&AllPage.SpinnerRetrieving; Finding libraries that hold this item...

Details

Named Person: Immanuel Kant; Immanuel Kant; Immanuel Kant; Immanuel Kant
Document Type: Book
All Authors / Contributors: David Cummiskey
ISBN: 0195094530 9780195094534
OCLC Number: 32242573
Description: xii, 192 p. ; 24 cm.
Contents: 1. Introduction --
2. The Motive of Duty --
3. Formal Principles and Objective Ends --
4. Rational Nature as an End-in-Itself --
5. The Derivation of Consequentialism --
6. The (Not So) Imperfect Duty of Beneficence --
7. Respect, Dignity, and the Kingdom of Ends --
8. The Sacrifices of the Innocent --
9. Conclusion --
Appendix: Kantian Internalism.
Responsibility: David Cummiskey.
More information:

Abstract:

The central issue in normative ethics hinges on the conflict between a consequentialist view - that morality requires promoting the good of all - and a Kantian view - that we should respect the rights of the individual. Kantians and non-Kantians alike have presumed that Kant's ethics is incompatible with all forms of consequentialism, and instead justifies a duty-based and agent-centered moral theory. From this perspective, certain actions, like sacrificing the innocent, are categorically forbidden. In this provocative and controversial book, philosopher David Cummiskey argues that the two approaches are indeed compatible and that Kant's own arguments entail a consequentialist conclusion. But this new form of consequentialism, which follows from Kant's theory, has a distinctly Kantian tone.

Through scrupulous analysis of Kant's writings and exhaustive consideration of recent scholarship on Kant, Cummiskey demonstrates that the foundations of Kantian thought are the basis for an enriched understanding of moral principles and values. Cummiskey's reconstruction of Kant's argument reveals that the value of rational nature is indeed prior to the value of pleasure and all other goods. Nonetheless, contrary to prevailing opinion, Kant's ethics does not provide any justification for constraints on the maximization of the good. A major new interpretation of one of philosophy's most prominent figures, Kantian Consequentialism is essential reading for anyone interested in the central issues of moral philosophy.

Reviews

User-contributed reviews
Retrieving GoodReads reviews...

Tags

Be the first.
Confirm this request

You may have already requested this item. Please select Ok if you would like to proceed with this request anyway.

Linked Data


<http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/32242573>
library:oclcnum"32242573"
library:placeOfPublication
library:placeOfPublication
owl:sameAs<info:oclcnum/32242573>
rdf:typeschema:Book
rdfs:seeAlso
rdfs:seeAlso
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
rdf:typeschema:Person
schema:name"Kant, Immanuel, 1724-1804"
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:author
schema:datePublished"1996"
schema:description"The central issue in normative ethics hinges on the conflict between a consequentialist view - that morality requires promoting the good of all - and a Kantian view - that we should respect the rights of the individual. Kantians and non-Kantians alike have presumed that Kant's ethics is incompatible with all forms of consequentialism, and instead justifies a duty-based and agent-centered moral theory. From this perspective, certain actions, like sacrificing the innocent, are categorically forbidden. In this provocative and controversial book, philosopher David Cummiskey argues that the two approaches are indeed compatible and that Kant's own arguments entail a consequentialist conclusion. But this new form of consequentialism, which follows from Kant's theory, has a distinctly Kantian tone."
schema:description"1. Introduction -- 2. The Motive of Duty -- 3. Formal Principles and Objective Ends -- 4. Rational Nature as an End-in-Itself -- 5. The Derivation of Consequentialism -- 6. The (Not So) Imperfect Duty of Beneficence -- 7. Respect, Dignity, and the Kingdom of Ends -- 8. The Sacrifices of the Innocent -- 9. Conclusion -- Appendix: Kantian Internalism."
schema:inLanguage"en"
schema:name"Kantian consequentialism"
schema:numberOfPages"192"
schema:publisher
Close Window

Please sign in to WorldCat 

Don't have an account? You can easily create a free account.