跳到内容
Logical tools for modelling legal argument : a study of defeasible reasoning in law
关闭预览资料

Logical tools for modelling legal argument : a study of defeasible reasoning in law

著者: Henry Prakken
出版商: Dordrecht ; Boston : Kluwer Academic Publishers, ©1997.
丛书: Law and philosophy library, v. 32.
版本/格式:   图书 : 英语查看所有的版本和格式
提要:
This book, the expanded and completely revised text of the author's renowned 1993 dissertation, studies the logical aspects of legal reasoning, in order to provide philosophical foundations for legal applications of Artificial Intelligence. It respects that legal reasoning often takes place in a disputational setting, and observes that the law leaves ample room for disagreement, which means that lawyers reason under
评估:

(尚未评估) 0 附有评论 - 争取成为第一个。

 

在图书馆查找

正在检索... 正在查找有这资料的图书馆...

详细书目

材料类型: 互联网资源
文件类型: 书, 互联网资源
所有的著者/提供者: Henry Prakken
ISBN: 0792347765 9780792347767
OCLC号码: 37588393
注意: Rev. and extended version of the author's thesis (Ph. D.--Free University, Amsterdam, 1993).
描述: xiii, 314 p. ; 25 cm.
内容: 1. Introduction --
2. The Role of Logic in Legal Reasoning --
3. The Need for New Logical Tools --
4. Logics for Nonmonotonic Reasoning --
5. Representing Explicit Exceptions --
6. Preferring the Most Specific Argument --
7. Reasoning with Inconsistent Information --
8. Reasoning about Priority Relations --
9. Systems for Defeasible Argumentation --
10. Using the Argumentation System --
11. Conclusion.
丛书名: Law and philosophy library, v. 32.
责任: Henry Prakken.
更多信息:

摘要:

This book, the expanded and completely revised text of the author's renowned 1993 dissertation, studies the logical aspects of legal reasoning, in order to provide philosophical foundations for legal applications of Artificial Intelligence. It respects that legal reasoning often takes place in a disputational setting, and observes that the law leaves ample room for disagreement, which means that lawyers reason under the possibility of exceptions and with contradictory legal sources, and cannot do without non-deductive reasoning forms, such as analogical reasoning.

The study shows that, contrary to what is often said, these features do not escape a logical analysis if recent developments in logic and Artificial Intelligence on so-called non-monotonic reasoning and defeasible argumentation are used, and if logic is regarded as a tool in, rather than as, a model of legal argument. This book is relevant for scholars in legal philosophy, Artificial Intelligence, logic and argumentation theory, and can also serve as a textbook for graduate courses in AI & Law, non-monotonic reasoning and legal argumentation.

评论

用户提供的评论
正在检索weRead中的评论...
正在获取GoodReads评论...
正在检索Amazon中的评论...

标签

争取是第一个!
确认申请

您可能已经申请过这份资料。如果还是想申请,请选确认。

关闭窗口

请登入WorldCat 

没有张号吗?很容易就可以 建立免费的账号.