omitir hasta el contenido
A matter of interpretation : federal courts and the law : an essay Ver este material de antemano
CerrarVer este material de antemano
Chequeando…

A matter of interpretation : federal courts and the law : an essay

Autor: Antonin Scalia; Amy Gutmann; et al
Editorial: Princeton, N.J. : Princeton University Press, ©1997.
Serie: University Center for Human Values series.
Edición/Formato:   Libro : Inglés (eng)Ver todas las ediciones y todos los formatos
Base de datos:WorldCat
Resumen:
"In exploring the neglected art of statutory interpretation, Antonin Scalia urges that judges resist the temptation to use legislative intention and legislative history. In his view, it is incompatible with democratic government to allow the meaning of a statute to be determined by what the judges think the lawgivers meant rather than by what the legislature actually promulgated. Eschewing the judicial law-making  Leer más
Calificación:

basada en 2 calificación/es 0 con reseñas - Ser el primero.

Temas
Más materiales como éste

 

Encontrar un ejemplar en la biblioteca

&AllPage.SpinnerRetrieving; Encontrando bibliotecas que tienen este material…

Detalles

Tipo de material: Recurso en Internet
Tipo de documento: Libro/Texto, Recurso en Internet
Todos autores / colaboradores: Antonin Scalia; Amy Gutmann; et al
ISBN: 0691026300 9780691026305
Número OCLC: 35280772
Descripción: xiii, 159 p. ; 25 cm.
Contenido: Common-law courts in a civil-law system: the role of United States federal courts in interpreting the constitution and laws / Antonin Scalia --
Comment / Gordon S. Wood --
Comment / Laurence H. Tribe --
Comment / Mary Ann Glendon --
Comment / Ronald Dworkin --
Response / Antonin Scalia.
Título de la serie: University Center for Human Values series.
Responsabilidad: by Antonin Scalia ; with commentary by Amy Gutmann, editor ... [et al.].
Más información:

Resumen:

In this essay, Judge Antonin Scalia argues that the common-law mindset, although approriate in its place, is not suitable for statutory and constitutional interpretation. He urges judges to resist  Leer más

Reseñas

Reseñas editoriales

Resumen de la editorial

""A Matter of Interpretation" demonstrates both the attraction of Scalia's 'textualist' theory and his qualities as a judicial statesman. . . [His] elegant essay, the most concise and accessible Leer más

 
Reseñas contribuidas por usuarios
Recuperando reseñas de GoodReads…
Recuperando reseñas de DOGObooks…

Etiquetas

Ser el primero.
Confirmar este pedido

Ya ha pedido este material. Escoja OK si desea procesar el pedido de todos modos.

Datos enlazados


<http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/35280772>
library:oclcnum"35280772"
library:placeOfPublication
library:placeOfPublication
owl:sameAs<info:oclcnum/35280772>
rdf:typeschema:Book
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
<http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh2008106844>
rdf:typeschema:Intangible
schema:name"Law--United States--Interpretation and construction."@en
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
<http://id.worldcat.org/fast/993756>
rdf:typeschema:Intangible
schema:name"Law--Interpretation and construction"@en
schema:name"Law--Interpretation and construction."@en
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:contributor
schema:copyrightYear"1997"
schema:creator
schema:datePublished"1997"
schema:exampleOfWork<http://worldcat.org/entity/work/id/1406627879>
schema:inLanguage"en"
schema:name"A matter of interpretation : federal courts and the law : an essay"@en
schema:numberOfPages"159"
schema:publisher
schema:reviews
rdf:typeschema:Review
schema:itemReviewed<http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/35280772>
schema:reviewBody""In exploring the neglected art of statutory interpretation, Antonin Scalia urges that judges resist the temptation to use legislative intention and legislative history. In his view, it is incompatible with democratic government to allow the meaning of a statute to be determined by what the judges think the lawgivers meant rather than by what the legislature actually promulgated. Eschewing the judicial law-making that is the essence of common law, judges should interpret statutes and regulations by focusing on the text itself. Scalia then extends this principle to constitutional law. He proposes that we abandon the notion of an ever changing Constitution and pay attention to the Constitution's original meaning. Although not subscribing to the "strict constructionism" that would prevent applying the Constitution to modern circumstances, Scalia emphatically rejects the idea that judges can properly "smuggle" in new rights or deny old rights by using the Due Process Clause, for instance. In fact, such judicial discretion might lead to the destruction of the Bill of Rights if a majority of the judges ever wished to reach that most undesirable of goals." "This essay is followed by four commentaries by Gordon Wood, Laurence Tribe, Mary Ann Glendon, and Ronald Dworkin, who engage Justice Scalia's ideas about judicial interpretation, and the volume concludes with a response by Scalia. Dealing with one of the most fundamental issues in American law, A Matter of Interpretation reveals what is at the heart of this important debate."--Jacket."
schema:url
schema:workExample

Content-negotiable representations

Cerrar ventana

Inicie una sesión con WorldCat 

¿No tienes una cuenta? Puede fácilmente crear una cuenta gratuita.