přejít na obsah
The mediation dilemma Náhled dokumentu
ZavřítNáhled dokumentu
Probíhá kontrola...

The mediation dilemma

Autor Kyle Beardsley
Vydavatel: Ithaca, N.Y. : Cornell University Press, 2011.
Edice: Cornell studies in security affairs.
Vydání/formát:   Kniha : EnglishZobrazit všechny vydání a formáty
Databáze:WorldCat
Shrnutí:
Mediation has become a common technique for terminating violent conflicts both within and between states; while mediation has a strong record in reducing hostilities, it is not without its own problems. In The Mediation Dilemma, Kyle Beardsley highlights its long-term limitations. The result of this oft-superficial approach to peacemaking, immediate and reassuring as it may be, is often a fragile peace. With the  Přečíst více...
Hodnocení:

(ještě nehodnoceno) 0 zobrazit recenze - Buďte první.

Předmětová hesla:
Více podobných

 

Vyhledat exemplář v knihovně

&AllPage.SpinnerRetrieving; Vyhledávání knihoven, které vlastní tento dokument...

Detaily

Typ dokumentu: Book
Všichni autoři/tvůrci: Kyle Beardsley
ISBN: 9780801450037 0801450039 9786968182002 6968182009
OCLC číslo: 726621712
Popis: ix, 240 pages : illustrations ; 25 cm.
Obsahy: The dilemma ---
Negotiating mediation ---
Why accept mediation? ---
Raison d'être : short-term benefits of mediation ---
The struggle for self-enforcing peace ---
Mediation in intrastate conflicts ---
Implications, applications, and conclusions.
Název edice: Cornell studies in security affairs.
Odpovědnost: Kyle Beardsley.

Anotace:

Mediation has become a common technique for terminating violent conflicts both within and between states; while mediation has a strong record in reducing hostilities, it is not without its own problems. In The Mediation Dilemma, Kyle Beardsley highlights its long-term limitations. The result of this oft-superficial approach to peacemaking, immediate and reassuring as it may be, is often a fragile peace. With the intervention of a third-party mediator, warring parties may formally agree to concessions that are insupportable in the long term and soon enough find themselves at odds again. Beardsley examines his argument empirically using two data sets and traces it through several historical cases: Henry Kissinger's and Jimmy Carter's initiatives in the Middle East, 1973-1979; Theodore Rooseveltʹs 1905 mediation in the Russo-Japanese War; and Carterʹs attempt to mediate in the 1994 North Korean nuclear crisis. He also draws upon the lessons of the 1993 Arusha Accords, the 1993 Oslo Accords, Haiti in 1994, the 2002 Ceasefire Agreement in Sri Lanka, and the 2005 Memorandum of Understanding in Aceh. Beardsley concludes that a reliance on mediation risks a greater chance of conflict relapse in the future, whereas the rejection of mediation risks ongoing bloodshed as war continues. -- Book jacket.

Recenze

Recenze vložené uživatelem
Nahrávání recenzí GoodReads...
Přebírání recenzí DOGO books...

Štítky

Buďte první.

Podobné dokumenty

Související předmětová hesla:(8)

Seznamy uživatele s tímto dokumentem (6)

Potvrdit tento požadavek

Tento dokument jste si již vyžádali. Prosím vyberte Ok pokud chcete přesto v žádance pokračovat.

Propojená data


<http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/726621712>
library:oclcnum"726621712"
library:placeOfPublication
library:placeOfPublication
rdf:typeschema:Book
schema:about
<http://id.worldcat.org/fast/894387>
rdf:typeschema:Intangible
schema:name"Diplomatic negotiations in international disputes."@en
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
<http://id.worldcat.org/fast/1050091>
rdf:typeschema:Intangible
schema:name"Pacific settlement of international disputes."@en
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:creator
schema:datePublished"2011"
schema:description"Mediation has become a common technique for terminating violent conflicts both within and between states; while mediation has a strong record in reducing hostilities, it is not without its own problems. In The Mediation Dilemma, Kyle Beardsley highlights its long-term limitations. The result of this oft-superficial approach to peacemaking, immediate and reassuring as it may be, is often a fragile peace. With the intervention of a third-party mediator, warring parties may formally agree to concessions that are insupportable in the long term and soon enough find themselves at odds again. Beardsley examines his argument empirically using two data sets and traces it through several historical cases: Henry Kissinger's and Jimmy Carter's initiatives in the Middle East, 1973-1979; Theodore Rooseveltʹs 1905 mediation in the Russo-Japanese War; and Carterʹs attempt to mediate in the 1994 North Korean nuclear crisis. He also draws upon the lessons of the 1993 Arusha Accords, the 1993 Oslo Accords, Haiti in 1994, the 2002 Ceasefire Agreement in Sri Lanka, and the 2005 Memorandum of Understanding in Aceh. Beardsley concludes that a reliance on mediation risks a greater chance of conflict relapse in the future, whereas the rejection of mediation risks ongoing bloodshed as war continues. -- Book jacket."@en
schema:description"The dilemma --- Negotiating mediation --- Why accept mediation? --- Raison d'être : short-term benefits of mediation --- The struggle for self-enforcing peace --- Mediation in intrastate conflicts --- Implications, applications, and conclusions."@en
schema:exampleOfWork<http://worldcat.org/entity/work/id/902884358>
schema:inLanguage"en"
schema:isPartOf
schema:name"The mediation dilemma"@en
schema:publication
schema:publisher
schema:workExample
schema:workExample
wdrs:describedby

Content-negotiable representations

Zavřít okno

Prosím přihlaste se do WorldCat 

Nemáte účet? Můžete si jednoduše vytvořit bezplatný účet.