omitir hasta el contenido
The mediation dilemma Ver este material de antemano
CerrarVer este material de antemano
Chequeando…

The mediation dilemma

Autor: Kyle Beardsley
Editorial: Ithaca, N.Y. : Cornell University Press, 2011.
Serie: Cornell studies in security affairs.
Edición/Formato:   Libro : Inglés (eng)Ver todas las ediciones y todos los formatos
Base de datos:WorldCat
Resumen:
Mediation has become a common technique for terminating violent conflicts both within and between states; while mediation has a strong record in reducing hostilities, it is not without its own problems. In The Mediation Dilemma, Kyle Beardsley highlights its long-term limitations. The result of this oft-superficial approach to peacemaking, immediate and reassuring as it may be, is often a fragile peace. With the  Leer más
Calificación:

(todavía no calificado) 0 con reseñas - Ser el primero.

Temas
Más materiales como éste

 

Encontrar un ejemplar en la biblioteca

&AllPage.SpinnerRetrieving; Encontrando bibliotecas que tienen este material…

Detalles

Tipo de documento: Libro/Texto
Todos autores / colaboradores: Kyle Beardsley
ISBN: 9780801450037 0801450039 9786968182002 6968182009
Número OCLC: 726621712
Descripción: ix, 240 pages : illustrations ; 25 cm.
Contenido: The dilemma ---
Negotiating mediation ---
Why accept mediation? ---
Raison d'être : short-term benefits of mediation ---
The struggle for self-enforcing peace ---
Mediation in intrastate conflicts ---
Implications, applications, and conclusions.
Título de la serie: Cornell studies in security affairs.
Responsabilidad: Kyle Beardsley.

Resumen:

Mediation has become a common technique for terminating violent conflicts both within and between states; while mediation has a strong record in reducing hostilities, it is not without its own problems. In The Mediation Dilemma, Kyle Beardsley highlights its long-term limitations. The result of this oft-superficial approach to peacemaking, immediate and reassuring as it may be, is often a fragile peace. With the intervention of a third-party mediator, warring parties may formally agree to concessions that are insupportable in the long term and soon enough find themselves at odds again. Beardsley examines his argument empirically using two data sets and traces it through several historical cases: Henry Kissinger's and Jimmy Carter's initiatives in the Middle East, 1973-1979; Theodore Rooseveltʹs 1905 mediation in the Russo-Japanese War; and Carterʹs attempt to mediate in the 1994 North Korean nuclear crisis. He also draws upon the lessons of the 1993 Arusha Accords, the 1993 Oslo Accords, Haiti in 1994, the 2002 Ceasefire Agreement in Sri Lanka, and the 2005 Memorandum of Understanding in Aceh. Beardsley concludes that a reliance on mediation risks a greater chance of conflict relapse in the future, whereas the rejection of mediation risks ongoing bloodshed as war continues. -- Book jacket.

Reseñas

Reseñas contribuidas por usuarios
Recuperando reseñas de GoodReads…
Recuperando reseñas de DOGObooks…

Etiquetas

Ser el primero.

Materiales similares

Temas relacionados:(8)

Listas de usuarios con este material (6)

Confirmar este pedido

Ya ha pedido este material. Escoja OK si desea procesar el pedido de todos modos.

Datos enlazados


<http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/726621712>
library:oclcnum"726621712"
library:placeOfPublication
library:placeOfPublication
rdf:typeschema:Book
schema:about
<http://id.worldcat.org/fast/894387>
rdf:typeschema:Intangible
schema:name"Diplomatic negotiations in international disputes."@en
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
<http://id.worldcat.org/fast/1050091>
rdf:typeschema:Intangible
schema:name"Pacific settlement of international disputes."@en
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:creator
schema:datePublished"2011"
schema:description"Mediation has become a common technique for terminating violent conflicts both within and between states; while mediation has a strong record in reducing hostilities, it is not without its own problems. In The Mediation Dilemma, Kyle Beardsley highlights its long-term limitations. The result of this oft-superficial approach to peacemaking, immediate and reassuring as it may be, is often a fragile peace. With the intervention of a third-party mediator, warring parties may formally agree to concessions that are insupportable in the long term and soon enough find themselves at odds again. Beardsley examines his argument empirically using two data sets and traces it through several historical cases: Henry Kissinger's and Jimmy Carter's initiatives in the Middle East, 1973-1979; Theodore Rooseveltʹs 1905 mediation in the Russo-Japanese War; and Carterʹs attempt to mediate in the 1994 North Korean nuclear crisis. He also draws upon the lessons of the 1993 Arusha Accords, the 1993 Oslo Accords, Haiti in 1994, the 2002 Ceasefire Agreement in Sri Lanka, and the 2005 Memorandum of Understanding in Aceh. Beardsley concludes that a reliance on mediation risks a greater chance of conflict relapse in the future, whereas the rejection of mediation risks ongoing bloodshed as war continues. -- Book jacket."@en
schema:description"The dilemma --- Negotiating mediation --- Why accept mediation? --- Raison d'être : short-term benefits of mediation --- The struggle for self-enforcing peace --- Mediation in intrastate conflicts --- Implications, applications, and conclusions."@en
schema:exampleOfWork<http://worldcat.org/entity/work/id/902884358>
schema:inLanguage"en"
schema:isPartOf
schema:name"The mediation dilemma"@en
schema:publication
schema:publisher
schema:workExample
schema:workExample
wdrs:describedby

Content-negotiable representations

Cerrar ventana

Inicie una sesión con WorldCat 

¿No tienes una cuenta? Puede fácilmente crear una cuenta gratuita.