コンテンツへ移動
The mediation dilemma 資料のプレビュー
閉じる資料のプレビュー
確認中…

The mediation dilemma

著者: Kyle Beardsley
出版: Ithaca, N.Y. : Cornell University Press, 2011.
シリーズ: Cornell studies in security affairs.
エディション/フォーマット:   書籍 : Englishすべてのエディションとフォーマットを見る
データベース:WorldCat
概要:
Mediation has become a common technique for terminating violent conflicts both within and between states; while mediation has a strong record in reducing hostilities, it is not without its own problems. In The Mediation Dilemma, Kyle Beardsley highlights its long-term limitations. The result of this oft-superficial approach to peacemaking, immediate and reassuring as it may be, is often a fragile peace. With the  続きを読む
評価:

(まだ評価がありません) 0 件のレビュー - 是非あなたから!

件名:
関連情報:

 

オフラインで入手

&AllPage.SpinnerRetrieving; この資料の所蔵館を検索中…

詳細

ドキュメントの種類: 図書
すべての著者/寄与者: Kyle Beardsley
ISBN: 9780801450037 0801450039 9786968182002 6968182009
OCLC No.: 726621712
物理形態: ix, 240 pages : illustrations ; 25 cm.
コンテンツ: The dilemma ---
Negotiating mediation ---
Why accept mediation? ---
Raison d'être : short-term benefits of mediation ---
The struggle for self-enforcing peace ---
Mediation in intrastate conflicts ---
Implications, applications, and conclusions.
シリーズタイトル: Cornell studies in security affairs.
責任者: Kyle Beardsley.

概要:

Mediation has become a common technique for terminating violent conflicts both within and between states; while mediation has a strong record in reducing hostilities, it is not without its own problems. In The Mediation Dilemma, Kyle Beardsley highlights its long-term limitations. The result of this oft-superficial approach to peacemaking, immediate and reassuring as it may be, is often a fragile peace. With the intervention of a third-party mediator, warring parties may formally agree to concessions that are insupportable in the long term and soon enough find themselves at odds again. Beardsley examines his argument empirically using two data sets and traces it through several historical cases: Henry Kissinger's and Jimmy Carter's initiatives in the Middle East, 1973-1979; Theodore Rooseveltʹs 1905 mediation in the Russo-Japanese War; and Carterʹs attempt to mediate in the 1994 North Korean nuclear crisis. He also draws upon the lessons of the 1993 Arusha Accords, the 1993 Oslo Accords, Haiti in 1994, the 2002 Ceasefire Agreement in Sri Lanka, and the 2005 Memorandum of Understanding in Aceh. Beardsley concludes that a reliance on mediation risks a greater chance of conflict relapse in the future, whereas the rejection of mediation risks ongoing bloodshed as war continues. -- Book jacket.

レビュー

ユーザーレビュー
GoodReadsのレビューを取得中…
DOGObooksのレビューを取得中…

タグ

まずはあなたから!
リクエストの確認

あなたは既にこの資料をリクエストしている可能性があります。このリクエストを続行してよろしければ、OK を選択してください。

リンクデータ


<http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/726621712>
library:oclcnum"726621712"
library:placeOfPublication
library:placeOfPublication
owl:sameAs<info:oclcnum/726621712>
rdf:typeschema:Book
schema:about
<http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85038190>
rdf:typeschema:Intangible
schema:name"Diplomatic negotiations in international disputes."@en
schema:about
schema:about
<http://id.worldcat.org/fast/894387>
rdf:typeschema:Intangible
schema:name"Diplomatic negotiations in international disputes"@en
schema:name"Diplomatic negotiations in international disputes."@en
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
<http://id.worldcat.org/fast/1050091>
rdf:typeschema:Intangible
schema:name"Pacific settlement of international disputes"@en
schema:name"Pacific settlement of international disputes."@en
schema:about
<http://id.worldcat.org/fast/1013650>
rdf:typeschema:Intangible
schema:name"Mediation, International"@en
schema:name"Mediation, International."@en
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:creator
schema:datePublished"2011"
schema:description"Mediation has become a common technique for terminating violent conflicts both within and between states; while mediation has a strong record in reducing hostilities, it is not without its own problems. In The Mediation Dilemma, Kyle Beardsley highlights its long-term limitations. The result of this oft-superficial approach to peacemaking, immediate and reassuring as it may be, is often a fragile peace. With the intervention of a third-party mediator, warring parties may formally agree to concessions that are insupportable in the long term and soon enough find themselves at odds again. Beardsley examines his argument empirically using two data sets and traces it through several historical cases: Henry Kissinger's and Jimmy Carter's initiatives in the Middle East, 1973-1979; Theodore Rooseveltʹs 1905 mediation in the Russo-Japanese War; and Carterʹs attempt to mediate in the 1994 North Korean nuclear crisis. He also draws upon the lessons of the 1993 Arusha Accords, the 1993 Oslo Accords, Haiti in 1994, the 2002 Ceasefire Agreement in Sri Lanka, and the 2005 Memorandum of Understanding in Aceh. Beardsley concludes that a reliance on mediation risks a greater chance of conflict relapse in the future, whereas the rejection of mediation risks ongoing bloodshed as war continues. -- Book jacket."@en
schema:description"The dilemma --- Negotiating mediation --- Why accept mediation? --- Raison d'être : short-term benefits of mediation --- The struggle for self-enforcing peace --- Mediation in intrastate conflicts --- Implications, applications, and conclusions."@en
schema:exampleOfWork<http://worldcat.org/entity/work/id/902884358>
schema:inLanguage"en"
schema:name"The mediation dilemma"@en
schema:publisher
schema:url
schema:workExample
schema:workExample

Content-negotiable representations

ウインドウを閉じる

WorldCatにログインしてください 

アカウントをお持ちではないですか?簡単に 無料アカウントを作成することができます。.