컨텐츠로 이동
The mediation dilemma 해당 항목을 미리보기
닫기해당 항목을 미리보기
확인중입니다…

The mediation dilemma

저자: Kyle Beardsley
출판사: Ithaca, N.Y. : Cornell University Press, 2011.
시리즈: Cornell studies in security affairs.
판/형식:   도서 : 영어모든 판과 형식 보기
데이터베이스:WorldCat
요약:
Mediation has become a common technique for terminating violent conflicts both within and between states; while mediation has a strong record in reducing hostilities, it is not without its own problems. In The Mediation Dilemma, Kyle Beardsley highlights its long-term limitations. The result of this oft-superficial approach to peacemaking, immediate and reassuring as it may be, is often a fragile peace. With the  더 읽기…
평가:

(아무런 평가가 없습니다.) 0 리뷰와 함께 - 첫번째로 올려주세요.

주제
다음과 같습니다:

 

도서관에서 사본 찾기

&AllPage.SpinnerRetrieving; 해당항목을 보유하고 있는 도서관을 찾는 중

상세정보

문서 형식:
모든 저자 / 참여자: Kyle Beardsley
ISBN: 9780801450037 0801450039 9786968182002 6968182009
OCLC 번호: 726621712
설명: ix, 240 p. : ill. ; 25 cm.
내용: The dilemma ---
Negotiating mediation ---
Why accept mediation? ---
Raison d'être : short-term benefits of mediation ---
The struggle for self-enforcing peace ---
Mediation in intrastate conflicts ---
Implications, applications, and conclusions.
일련 제목: Cornell studies in security affairs.
책임: Kyle Beardsley.

초록:

Mediation has become a common technique for terminating violent conflicts both within and between states; while mediation has a strong record in reducing hostilities, it is not without its own problems. In The Mediation Dilemma, Kyle Beardsley highlights its long-term limitations. The result of this oft-superficial approach to peacemaking, immediate and reassuring as it may be, is often a fragile peace. With the intervention of a third-party mediator, warring parties may formally agree to concessions that are insupportable in the long term and soon enough find themselves at odds again. Beardsley examines his argument empirically using two data sets and traces it through several historical cases: Henry Kissinger's and Jimmy Carter's initiatives in the Middle East, 1973-1979; Theodore Rooseveltʹs 1905 mediation in the Russo-Japanese War; and Carterʹs attempt to mediate in the 1994 North Korean nuclear crisis. He also draws upon the lessons of the 1993 Arusha Accords, the 1993 Oslo Accords, Haiti in 1994, the 2002 Ceasefire Agreement in Sri Lanka, and the 2005 Memorandum of Understanding in Aceh. Beardsley concludes that a reliance on mediation risks a greater chance of conflict relapse in the future, whereas the rejection of mediation risks ongoing bloodshed as war continues. -- Book jacket.

리뷰

사용자-기여 리뷰
GoodReads 리뷰 가져오는 중…
DOGObooks 리뷰를 가지고 오는 중…

태그

첫번째 되기

유사 항목

관련 주제:(5)

이 항목을 가지고 있는 사용자 목록 (7)

요청하신 것을 확인하기

이 항목을 이미 요청하셨을 수도 있습니다. 만약 이 요청을 계속해서 진행하시려면 Ok을 선택하세요.

링크된 데이터


<http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/726621712>
library:oclcnum"726621712"
library:placeOfPublication
library:placeOfPublication
owl:sameAs<info:oclcnum/726621712>
rdf:typeschema:Book
rdfs:seeAlso
schema:about
schema:about
<http://id.worldcat.org/fast/894387>
rdf:typeschema:Intangible
schema:name"Diplomatic negotiations in international disputes."
schema:about
<http://id.worldcat.org/fast/1050091>
rdf:typeschema:Intangible
schema:name"Pacific settlement of international disputes."
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:author
schema:datePublished"2011"
schema:description"Mediation has become a common technique for terminating violent conflicts both within and between states; while mediation has a strong record in reducing hostilities, it is not without its own problems. In The Mediation Dilemma, Kyle Beardsley highlights its long-term limitations. The result of this oft-superficial approach to peacemaking, immediate and reassuring as it may be, is often a fragile peace. With the intervention of a third-party mediator, warring parties may formally agree to concessions that are insupportable in the long term and soon enough find themselves at odds again. Beardsley examines his argument empirically using two data sets and traces it through several historical cases: Henry Kissinger's and Jimmy Carter's initiatives in the Middle East, 1973-1979; Theodore Rooseveltʹs 1905 mediation in the Russo-Japanese War; and Carterʹs attempt to mediate in the 1994 North Korean nuclear crisis. He also draws upon the lessons of the 1993 Arusha Accords, the 1993 Oslo Accords, Haiti in 1994, the 2002 Ceasefire Agreement in Sri Lanka, and the 2005 Memorandum of Understanding in Aceh. Beardsley concludes that a reliance on mediation risks a greater chance of conflict relapse in the future, whereas the rejection of mediation risks ongoing bloodshed as war continues. -- Book jacket."
schema:description"The dilemma --- Negotiating mediation --- Why accept mediation? --- Raison d'être : short-term benefits of mediation --- The struggle for self-enforcing peace --- Mediation in intrastate conflicts --- Implications, applications, and conclusions."
schema:exampleOfWork<http://worldcat.org/entity/work/id/902884358>
schema:inLanguage"en"
schema:name"The mediation dilemma"
schema:numberOfPages"240"
schema:publisher
rdf:typeschema:Organization
schema:name"Cornell University Press"
schema:workExample
schema:workExample
schema:workExample
schema:workExample

Content-negotiable representations

윈도우 닫기

WorldCat에 로그인 하십시오 

계정이 없으세요? 아주 간단한 절차를 통하여 무료 계정을 만드실 수 있습니다.