skip to content
Military bases : opportunities exist to improve future base realignment and closure rounds : report to congressional committees. Preview this item
ClosePreview this item
Checking...

Military bases : opportunities exist to improve future base realignment and closure rounds : report to congressional committees.

Author: United States. Government Accountability Office,
Publisher: [Washington, D.C.] : United States Government Accountability Office, 2013.
Edition/Format:   eBook : Document : National government publication : English
Database:WorldCat
Summary:
The 2005 BRAC round was the biggest, most complex, costliest BRAC round ever. Unlike the four previous rounds, which focused on reducing infrastructure, the Secretary of Defense saw BRAC 2005 as a unique opportunity to adjust DOD's base structure to meet new challenges, such as international terrorism and weapons of mass destruction, and to meet future challenges, such as designating where forces returning from  Read more...
Rating:

(not yet rated) 0 with reviews - Be the first.

Subjects
More like this

 

Find a copy online

Links to this item

Find a copy in the library

&AllPage.SpinnerRetrieving; Finding libraries that hold this item...

Details

Genre/Form: Rules
Material Type: Document, Government publication, National government publication, Internet resource
Document Type: Internet Resource, Computer File
All Authors / Contributors: United States. Government Accountability Office,
OCLC Number: 829674416
Notes: "March 2013."
"GAO-13-149."
Description: 1 online resource (ii, 105 pages) : color illustrations
Contents: Background --
DOD used a reasonable model to estimate costs and savings, but increased attention to requirements entered into the model would enhance the reliability of the initial estimates --
High-level leadership and a new governance structure guided BRAC 2005 planning and management, but opportunities exist to enhance planning of future BRAC rounds --
Several amendments to the BRAC statute could offer Congress greater assurances of future BRAC outcomes --
Conclusions.
Other Titles: Opportunities exist to improve future base realignment and closure rounds

Abstract:

The 2005 BRAC round was the biggest, most complex, costliest BRAC round ever. Unlike the four previous rounds, which focused on reducing infrastructure, the Secretary of Defense saw BRAC 2005 as a unique opportunity to adjust DOD's base structure to meet new challenges, such as international terrorism and weapons of mass destruction, and to meet future challenges, such as designating where forces returning from overseas would be located. While DOD's stated goals for BRAC 2005 included eliminating unneeded infrastructure, they also included furthering the transformation of DOD's force structure and fostering joint capabilities among the military services, resulting in recommendations of unprecedented scope and complexity. As GAO found in June 2012, BRAC implementation costs grew to about $35 billion, exceeding the initial 2005 estimate of $21 billion by 67 percent. As part of its fiscal year 2013 budget request, DOD asked for two more rounds of BRAC in 2013 and 2015. Congress has not acted on this request. As directed by the House Armed Services Committee, this report discusses lessons learned that could be applied if Congress chooses to authorize future BRAC rounds. GAO assessed (1) how DOD estimated BRAC costs and savings and any ways its methodology could be improved, (2) OSD leadership over BRAC 2005, and (3) any legislative changes Congress may wish to make that could enhance oversight of any future round.

Reviews

User-contributed reviews
Retrieving GoodReads reviews...
Retrieving DOGObooks reviews...

Tags

Be the first.
Confirm this request

You may have already requested this item. Please select Ok if you would like to proceed with this request anyway.

Linked Data


<http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/829674416>
library:oclcnum"829674416"
library:placeOfPublication
owl:sameAs<info:oclcnum/829674416>
rdf:typeschema:Book
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
<http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh2010101793>
rdf:typeschema:Intangible
schema:name"Military base closures--United States--Planning."@en
schema:name"Military base closures--United States--Costs."@en
schema:about
<http://viaf.org/viaf/150642478>
rdf:typeschema:Organization
schema:name"United States. Department of Defense."
schema:name"United States. Department of Defense"
schema:about
schema:about
<http://viaf.org/viaf/141001943>
rdf:typeschema:Organization
schema:name"United States. Defense Base Closure and Realignment Commission."
schema:name"United States. Defense Base Closure and Realignment Commission"
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
<http://id.worldcat.org/fast/1380758>
rdf:typeschema:CreativeWork
schema:name"Defense Authorization Amendments and Base Closure and Realignment Act (United States)"
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:bookFormatschema:EBook
schema:creator
<http://viaf.org/viaf/124152672>
rdf:typeschema:Organization
schema:name"United States. Government Accountability Office,"
schema:datePublished"2013"
schema:description"The 2005 BRAC round was the biggest, most complex, costliest BRAC round ever. Unlike the four previous rounds, which focused on reducing infrastructure, the Secretary of Defense saw BRAC 2005 as a unique opportunity to adjust DOD's base structure to meet new challenges, such as international terrorism and weapons of mass destruction, and to meet future challenges, such as designating where forces returning from overseas would be located. While DOD's stated goals for BRAC 2005 included eliminating unneeded infrastructure, they also included furthering the transformation of DOD's force structure and fostering joint capabilities among the military services, resulting in recommendations of unprecedented scope and complexity. As GAO found in June 2012, BRAC implementation costs grew to about $35 billion, exceeding the initial 2005 estimate of $21 billion by 67 percent. As part of its fiscal year 2013 budget request, DOD asked for two more rounds of BRAC in 2013 and 2015. Congress has not acted on this request. As directed by the House Armed Services Committee, this report discusses lessons learned that could be applied if Congress chooses to authorize future BRAC rounds. GAO assessed (1) how DOD estimated BRAC costs and savings and any ways its methodology could be improved, (2) OSD leadership over BRAC 2005, and (3) any legislative changes Congress may wish to make that could enhance oversight of any future round."@en
schema:description"Background -- DOD used a reasonable model to estimate costs and savings, but increased attention to requirements entered into the model would enhance the reliability of the initial estimates -- High-level leadership and a new governance structure guided BRAC 2005 planning and management, but opportunities exist to enhance planning of future BRAC rounds -- Several amendments to the BRAC statute could offer Congress greater assurances of future BRAC outcomes -- Conclusions."@en
schema:exampleOfWork<http://worldcat.org/entity/work/id/1212049176>
schema:genre"Rules"@en
schema:genre"Rules."@en
schema:inLanguage"en"
schema:name"Military bases : opportunities exist to improve future base realignment and closure rounds : report to congressional committees."@en
schema:name"Opportunities exist to improve future base realignment and closure rounds"@en
schema:url<http://www.gao.gov/cgi-bin/getrpt?GAO-13-149>
schema:url<http://purl.fdlp.gov/GPO/gpo36201>
schema:url

Content-negotiable representations

Close Window

Please sign in to WorldCat 

Don't have an account? You can easily create a free account.