Find a copy in the library
Finding libraries that hold this item...
|Additional Physical Format:||Online version:
Wilson, James Q.
New York : BasicBooks, ©1997
|All Authors / Contributors:||
James Q Wilson
|Description:||ix, 134 pages ; 20 cm|
|Responsibility:||James Q. Wilson.|
Verdicts, among others, Wilson makes an erudite case for re-examining the ethical drift of contemporary jurisprudence. He suggests that courts may encourage individuals to reject personal responsibility for their actions, instead blaming society for failing them. The crux of Wilson's position rests in his closely deliberated congruence of law and morality, a subject that has concerned legal scholars and philosophers for centuries. That the law should follow closely upon.
What society deems morally correct, Wilson contends, is plain common sense. Today, though, what is legally excusable and what is morally acceptable have diverged to the point that criminals who should be given harsher sentences often get lighter penalties, or are even, sometimes, set free altogether. Even more dangerous, though, is a deeper corruption of the way jurists think and judge, which consequently has eroded how the larger public differentiates right and wrong.
With each passing day, the courts move closer to an atmosphere of moral paralysis, further impairing not only our capacity to deal with criminals, but also to make ethically sound judgments.
- Criminal liability -- Moral and ethical aspects -- United States.
- Criminal liability -- Social aspects -- United States.
- Extenuating circumstances -- United States.
- Criminal liability -- Moral and ethical aspects.
- Criminal liability -- Social aspects.
- Extenuating circumstances.
- United States.
- Responsabilité pénale -- Aspect social -- Etats-Unis.
- Responsabilité pénale -- Aspect moral.
- Circonstances atténuantes -- Etats-Unis.