omitir hasta el contenido
Morality imposed : the Rehnquist Court and liberty in America Ver este material de antemano
CerrarVer este material de antemano
Chequeando…

Morality imposed : the Rehnquist Court and liberty in America

Autor: Stephen E Gottlieb
Editorial: New York : New York University Press, ©2000.
Edición/Formato:   Libro : Inglés (eng)Ver todas las ediciones y todos los formatos
Base de datos:WorldCat
Resumen:
"We like to think of judges and justices as making decisions based on the facts and the law. But to what extent do jurists decide cases in accordance with their own preexisting philosophy of law, and what specific ideological assumptions account for their decisions? Stephen E. Gottlieb adopts a unique perspective on the decision-making of Supreme Court justices, blending and re-characterizing traditional accounts of  Leer más
Calificación:

(todavía no calificado) 0 con reseñas - Ser el primero.

Temas
Más materiales como éste

 

Encontrar un ejemplar en la biblioteca

&AllPage.SpinnerRetrieving; Encontrando bibliotecas que tienen este material…

Detalles

Persona designada: William H Rehnquist; William H Rehnquist
Tipo de documento: Libro/Texto
Todos autores / colaboradores: Stephen E Gottlieb
ISBN: 0814731287 9780814731284
Número OCLC: 42700401
Descripción: xvi, 342 p. ; 24 cm.
Contenido: 1. Origins --
2. The gulf --
3. Eclectic or unprincipled? --
4. Three justices in search of a character --
5. Between two worlds --
6. Consensus on the left --
7. Calculus --
8. Where utilitarians diverg --
9. Coda --
10. Ideoligical canons.
Responsabilidad: Stephen E. Gottlieb.
Más información:

Resumen:

Evaluating the decision-making of Supreme Court Justices, this text blends traditional accounts of political philosophy to explain justices' voting patterns. It illustrates how courts provide a  Leer más

Reseñas

Reseñas editoriales

Resumen de la editorial

"In this well-written and carefully documented book Professor Gottlieb contends that the conservative direction of this court is so strong that it is impossible for the poor and less fortunate to Leer más

 
Reseñas contribuidas por usuarios
Recuperando reseñas de GoodReads…
Recuperando reseñas de DOGObooks…

Etiquetas

Ser el primero.
Confirmar este pedido

Ya ha pedido este material. Escoja OK si desea procesar el pedido de todos modos.

Datos enlazados


<http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/42700401>
library:oclcnum"42700401"
library:placeOfPublication
library:placeOfPublication
owl:sameAs<info:oclcnum/42700401>
rdf:typeschema:Book
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
<http://viaf.org/viaf/144945827>
rdf:typeschema:Organization
schema:name"United States. Supreme Court"
schema:name"United States. Supreme Court."
schema:copyrightYear"2000"
schema:creator
schema:datePublished"2000"
schema:description""We like to think of judges and justices as making decisions based on the facts and the law. But to what extent do jurists decide cases in accordance with their own preexisting philosophy of law, and what specific ideological assumptions account for their decisions? Stephen E. Gottlieb adopts a unique perspective on the decision-making of Supreme Court justices, blending and re-characterizing traditional accounts of political philosophy in a way that plausibly explains many of the justices' voting patterns. A seminal study of the Rehnquist Court, Morality Imposed illustrates how, in contrast to previous courts which took their mandate to be a move toward a freer and/or happier society, the current court evidences little concern for this goal, focusing instead on thinly veiled moral judgments. Delineating a fault line between liberal and conservative justices on the Rehnquist Court, Gottlieb suggests that conservative justices have rejected the basic principles that informed post-New Deal individual rights jurisprudence and have substituted their own conceptions of moral character for these fundamental principles. Morality Imposed adds substantially to our understanding of the Supreme Court, its most recent cases, and the evolution of judicial philosophy in the U.S."--Publisher description."@en
schema:description"1. Origins -- 2. The gulf -- 3. Eclectic or unprincipled? -- 4. Three justices in search of a character -- 5. Between two worlds -- 6. Consensus on the left -- 7. Calculus -- 8. Where utilitarians diverg -- 9. Coda -- 10. Ideoligical canons."@en
schema:exampleOfWork<http://worldcat.org/entity/work/id/793080986>
schema:inLanguage"en"
schema:name"Morality imposed : the Rehnquist Court and liberty in America"@en
schema:numberOfPages"342"
schema:publisher
schema:url
schema:workExample

Content-negotiable representations

Cerrar ventana

Inicie una sesión con WorldCat 

¿No tienes una cuenta? Puede fácilmente crear una cuenta gratuita.