跳至内容
New York Times v. Sullivan : civil rights, libel law, and the free press 線上預覽
關閉線上預覽
正在查...

New York Times v. Sullivan : civil rights, libel law, and the free press

作者: Kermit L Hall; Melvin I Urofsky
出版商: Lawrence, Kan. : University Press of Kansas, ©2011.
叢書: Landmark law cases & American society; Landmark law cases & American society.
版本/格式:   圖書 : 英語所有版本和格式的總覽
資料庫:WorldCat
提要:
When the New York Times published an advertisement that accused Alabama officials of willfully abusing civil rights activists, Montgomery police commissioner Lester Sullivan filed suit for defamation. Alabama courts, citing factual errors in the ad, ordered the Times to pay half a million dollars in damages. The Times appealed to the Supreme Court, which had previously deferred to the states on libel issues. The  再讀一些...
評定級別:

(尚未評分) 0 附有評論 - 成爲第一個。

主題
更多類似這樣的

 

在圖書館查詢

&AllPage.SpinnerRetrieving; 正在查詢有此資料的圖書館...

詳細書目

提及的人: L B Sullivan; L B Sullivan
文件類型: 圖書
所有的作者/貢獻者: Kermit L Hall; Melvin I Urofsky
ISBN: 9780700618026 0700618023 9780700618033 0700618031
OCLC系統控制編碼: 711959938
描述: x, 222 pages ; 23 cm.
内容: A place in time --
"Lies, lies, lies" --
Trial by jury --
"Let 'em see the dogs work" --
The road to the Alabama Supreme Court --
A new game plan --
Briefing the court --
"May it please the court" --
"Uninhibited, robust, and wide-open."
叢書名: Landmark law cases & American society; Landmark law cases & American society.
其他題名: New York Times versus Sullivan
責任: Kermit L. Hall and Melvin I. Urofsky.

摘要:

Two of America's foremost legal historians illuminate the 1964 Supreme Court case that pitted Alabama segregationists against the New York Times and its critical depiction of the Deep South at the  再讀一些...

評論

讀者提供的評論
正在擷取GoodReads評論...
正在擷取DOGObooks的評論

標籤

成爲第一個
確認申請

你可能已經申請過這份資料。若還是想申請,請選確認。

連結資料


<http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/711959938>
library:oclcnum"711959938"
library:placeOfPublication
library:placeOfPublication
owl:sameAs<info:oclcnum/711959938>
rdf:typeschema:Book
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:contributor
schema:copyrightYear"2011"
schema:creator
schema:datePublished"2011"
schema:description"When the New York Times published an advertisement that accused Alabama officials of willfully abusing civil rights activists, Montgomery police commissioner Lester Sullivan filed suit for defamation. Alabama courts, citing factual errors in the ad, ordered the Times to pay half a million dollars in damages. The Times appealed to the Supreme Court, which had previously deferred to the states on libel issues. The justices, recognizing that Alabama's application of libel law threatened both the nation's free press and equal rights for African Americans, unanimously sided with the Times. The decision introduced a new First Amendment test: a public official cannot recover damages for libel unless he proves that the statement was made with the knowledge that it was false or with reckless disregard of whether it was false.-Publisher description."@en
schema:description"A place in time -- "Lies, lies, lies" -- Trial by jury -- "Let 'em see the dogs work" -- The road to the Alabama Supreme Court -- A new game plan -- Briefing the court -- "May it please the court" -- "Uninhibited, robust, and wide-open.""@en
schema:exampleOfWork<http://worldcat.org/entity/work/id/865269903>
schema:inLanguage"en"
schema:name"New York Times v. Sullivan : civil rights, libel law, and the free press"@en
schema:name"New York Times versus Sullivan"@en
schema:publisher
schema:url
schema:workExample
schema:workExample

Content-negotiable representations

關閉視窗

請登入WorldCat 

没有帳號嗎?你可很容易的 建立免費的帳號.