zum Inhalt wechseln
North-South benefit sharing arrangements in bioprospecting and genetic research: a critical ethical and legal analysis.
SchließenTitelvorschau
Prüfung…

North-South benefit sharing arrangements in bioprospecting and genetic research: a critical ethical and legal analysis.

Verfasser/in: U Schüklenk Mitgliedschaft: Centre for Ethics in Public Policy and Corporate Governance, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.; A Kleinsmidt
Ausgabe/Format Artikel Artikel : Englisch
Veröffentichung:Developing world bioethics, 2006 Dec; 6(3): 122-34
Datenbank:Von MEDLINE®/PubMed®,eine Datenbank der U.S. National Library of Medicine.
Andere Datenbanken: ECO
Zusammenfassung:
Most pharmaceutical research carried out today is focused on the treatment and management of the lifestyle diseases of the developed world. Diseases that affect mainly poor people are neglected in research advancements in treatment because they cannot generate large financial returns on research and development costs. Benefit sharing arrangements for the use of indigenous resources and genetic research could only  Weiterlesen…
Bewertung:

(noch nicht bewertet) 0 mit Rezensionen - Verfassen Sie als Erste eine Rezension.

Ähnliche Titel

 

&AllPage.SpinnerRetrieving;

Exemplar ausleihen

&AllPage.SpinnerRetrieving; Suche nach Bibliotheken, die diesen Titel besitzen ...

Details

Dokumenttyp: Aufsatz
Alle Autoren: U Schüklenk Mitgliedschaft: Centre for Ethics in Public Policy and Corporate Governance, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.; A Kleinsmidt
ISSN:1471-8731
Sprachhinweis: English
Identifikator: 110505688
Anmerkungen: 46 refs.
KIE Bib: genetic research
Auszeichnungen:

Abstract:

Most pharmaceutical research carried out today is focused on the treatment and management of the lifestyle diseases of the developed world. Diseases that affect mainly poor people are neglected in research advancements in treatment because they cannot generate large financial returns on research and development costs. Benefit sharing arrangements for the use of indigenous resources and genetic research could only marginally address this gap in research and development in diseases that affect the poor. Benefit sharing as a strategy is conceptually problematic, even if one, as we do, agrees that impoverished indigenous communities should not be exploited and that they should be assisted in improving their living conditions. The accepted concept of intellectual property protection envisages clearly defined originators and owners of knowledge, whereas the concept of community membership is fluid and indigenous knowledge is, by its very nature, open, with the originator(s) lost in the mists of time. The delineation of 'community' presents serious conceptual and practical difficulties as few communities form discrete, easily discernable groups, and most have problematic leadership structures. Benefit sharing is no substitute for governments' responsibility to uplift impoverished communities. Benefit sharing arrangements may be fraught with difficulties but considerations of respect and equity demand that prior informed consent and consultation around commercialisation of knowledge take place with the source community and their government.

Rezensionen

Nutzer-Rezensionen
Suche nach GoodReads-Rezensionen
Suche nach DOGObooks-Rezensionen…

Tags

Alle Nutzer-Tags (2)

Anzeige der beliebtesten Schlagwörter als: Schlagwortliste | Tag Cloud

  • ipr  (von 1 Person)
  • law  (von 1 Person)

Ähnliche Titel

Nutzerlisten mit diesen Titeln (1)

Anfrage bestätigen

Sie haben diesen Titel bereits angefordert. Wenn Sie trotzdem fortfahren möchten, klicken Sie auf OK.

Verlinkung


<http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/110505688>
library:oclcnum"110505688"
owl:sameAs<info:oclcnum/110505688>
rdf:typeschema:Article
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:contributor
schema:creator
schema:datePublished"2006-12"
schema:description"Most pharmaceutical research carried out today is focused on the treatment and management of the lifestyle diseases of the developed world. Diseases that affect mainly poor people are neglected in research advancements in treatment because they cannot generate large financial returns on research and development costs. Benefit sharing arrangements for the use of indigenous resources and genetic research could only marginally address this gap in research and development in diseases that affect the poor. Benefit sharing as a strategy is conceptually problematic, even if one, as we do, agrees that impoverished indigenous communities should not be exploited and that they should be assisted in improving their living conditions. The accepted concept of intellectual property protection envisages clearly defined originators and owners of knowledge, whereas the concept of community membership is fluid and indigenous knowledge is, by its very nature, open, with the originator(s) lost in the mists of time. The delineation of 'community' presents serious conceptual and practical difficulties as few communities form discrete, easily discernable groups, and most have problematic leadership structures. Benefit sharing is no substitute for governments' responsibility to uplift impoverished communities. Benefit sharing arrangements may be fraught with difficulties but considerations of respect and equity demand that prior informed consent and consultation around commercialisation of knowledge take place with the source community and their government."
schema:exampleOfWork<http://worldcat.org/entity/work/id/73720275>
schema:isPartOf
schema:isPartOf
schema:name"North-South benefit sharing arrangements in bioprospecting and genetic research: a critical ethical and legal analysis."
schema:pageStart"122"
schema:url

Content-negotiable representations

Fenster schließen

Bitte in WorldCat einloggen 

Sie haben kein Konto? Sie können sehr einfach ein kostenloses Konto anlegen,.