omitir hasta el contenido
North-South benefit sharing arrangements in bioprospecting and genetic research: a critical ethical and legal analysis.
CerrarVer este material de antemano
Chequeando…

North-South benefit sharing arrangements in bioprospecting and genetic research: a critical ethical and legal analysis.

Autor: U Schüklenk Afiliación: Centre for Ethics in Public Policy and Corporate Governance, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.; A Kleinsmidt
Edición/Formato: Artículo Artículo : Inglés (eng)
Publicación:Developing world bioethics, 2006 Dec; 6(3): 122-34
Base de datos:De MEDLINE®/PubMed®, una base de datos de la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina de los Estados Unidos.
Otras bases de datos: ECO
Resumen:
Most pharmaceutical research carried out today is focused on the treatment and management of the lifestyle diseases of the developed world. Diseases that affect mainly poor people are neglected in research advancements in treatment because they cannot generate large financial returns on research and development costs. Benefit sharing arrangements for the use of indigenous resources and genetic research could only  Leer más
Calificación:

(todavía no calificado) 0 con reseñas - Ser el primero.

Más materiales como éste

 

&AllPage.SpinnerRetrieving;

Encontrar un ejemplar en la biblioteca

&AllPage.SpinnerRetrieving; Encontrando bibliotecas que tienen este material…

Detalles

Tipo de documento: Artículo
Todos autores / colaboradores: U Schüklenk Afiliación: Centre for Ethics in Public Policy and Corporate Governance, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.; A Kleinsmidt
ISSN:1471-8731
Nota del idioma: English
Identificador único: 110505688
Notas: 46 refs.
KIE Bib: genetic research
Premios:

Resumen:

Most pharmaceutical research carried out today is focused on the treatment and management of the lifestyle diseases of the developed world. Diseases that affect mainly poor people are neglected in research advancements in treatment because they cannot generate large financial returns on research and development costs. Benefit sharing arrangements for the use of indigenous resources and genetic research could only marginally address this gap in research and development in diseases that affect the poor. Benefit sharing as a strategy is conceptually problematic, even if one, as we do, agrees that impoverished indigenous communities should not be exploited and that they should be assisted in improving their living conditions. The accepted concept of intellectual property protection envisages clearly defined originators and owners of knowledge, whereas the concept of community membership is fluid and indigenous knowledge is, by its very nature, open, with the originator(s) lost in the mists of time. The delineation of 'community' presents serious conceptual and practical difficulties as few communities form discrete, easily discernable groups, and most have problematic leadership structures. Benefit sharing is no substitute for governments' responsibility to uplift impoverished communities. Benefit sharing arrangements may be fraught with difficulties but considerations of respect and equity demand that prior informed consent and consultation around commercialisation of knowledge take place with the source community and their government.

Reseñas

Reseñas contribuidas por usuarios
Recuperando reseñas de GoodReads…
Recuperando reseñas de DOGObooks…

Etiquetas

Todas las etiquetas de usuarios (2)

Ver etiquetas más populares como: lista de etiquetas | nube de etiquetas

  • ipr  (por 1 persona)
  • law  (por 1 persona)

Materiales similares

Listas de usuarios con este material (1)

Confirmar este pedido

Ya ha pedido este material. Escoja OK si desea procesar el pedido de todos modos.

Datos enlazados


<http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/110505688>
library:oclcnum"110505688"
owl:sameAs<info:oclcnum/110505688>
rdf:typeschema:Article
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:contributor
schema:creator
schema:datePublished"2006-12"
schema:description"Most pharmaceutical research carried out today is focused on the treatment and management of the lifestyle diseases of the developed world. Diseases that affect mainly poor people are neglected in research advancements in treatment because they cannot generate large financial returns on research and development costs. Benefit sharing arrangements for the use of indigenous resources and genetic research could only marginally address this gap in research and development in diseases that affect the poor. Benefit sharing as a strategy is conceptually problematic, even if one, as we do, agrees that impoverished indigenous communities should not be exploited and that they should be assisted in improving their living conditions. The accepted concept of intellectual property protection envisages clearly defined originators and owners of knowledge, whereas the concept of community membership is fluid and indigenous knowledge is, by its very nature, open, with the originator(s) lost in the mists of time. The delineation of 'community' presents serious conceptual and practical difficulties as few communities form discrete, easily discernable groups, and most have problematic leadership structures. Benefit sharing is no substitute for governments' responsibility to uplift impoverished communities. Benefit sharing arrangements may be fraught with difficulties but considerations of respect and equity demand that prior informed consent and consultation around commercialisation of knowledge take place with the source community and their government."
schema:exampleOfWork<http://worldcat.org/entity/work/id/73720275>
schema:isPartOf
schema:isPartOf
schema:name"North-South benefit sharing arrangements in bioprospecting and genetic research: a critical ethical and legal analysis."
schema:pageStart"122"
schema:url

Content-negotiable representations

Cerrar ventana

Inicie una sesión con WorldCat 

¿No tienes una cuenta? Puede fácilmente crear una cuenta gratuita.