コンテンツへ移動
North-South benefit sharing arrangements in bioprospecting and genetic research: a critical ethical and legal analysis.
閉じる資料のプレビュー
確認中…

North-South benefit sharing arrangements in bioprospecting and genetic research: a critical ethical and legal analysis.

著者: U Schüklenk 所属: Centre for Ethics in Public Policy and Corporate Governance, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.; A Kleinsmidt
エディション/フォーマット: 記事/論文 記事/論文 : English
出版:Developing world bioethics, 2006 Dec; 6(3): 122-34
データベース::MEDLINE®/ PubMed®
その他のデータベース: ECO
概要:
Most pharmaceutical research carried out today is focused on the treatment and management of the lifestyle diseases of the developed world. Diseases that affect mainly poor people are neglected in research advancements in treatment because they cannot generate large financial returns on research and development costs. Benefit sharing arrangements for the use of indigenous resources and genetic research could only  続きを読む
評価:

(まだ評価がありません) 0 件のレビュー - 是非あなたから!

関連情報:

 

&AllPage.SpinnerRetrieving;

オフラインで入手

&AllPage.SpinnerRetrieving; この資料の所蔵館を検索中…

詳細

ドキュメントの種類: 記事
すべての著者/寄与者: U Schüklenk 所属: Centre for Ethics in Public Policy and Corporate Governance, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.; A Kleinsmidt
ISSN:1471-8731
言語注記: English
固有識別子 110505688
注記: 46 refs.
KIE Bib: genetic research
受賞歴:

概要:

Most pharmaceutical research carried out today is focused on the treatment and management of the lifestyle diseases of the developed world. Diseases that affect mainly poor people are neglected in research advancements in treatment because they cannot generate large financial returns on research and development costs. Benefit sharing arrangements for the use of indigenous resources and genetic research could only marginally address this gap in research and development in diseases that affect the poor. Benefit sharing as a strategy is conceptually problematic, even if one, as we do, agrees that impoverished indigenous communities should not be exploited and that they should be assisted in improving their living conditions. The accepted concept of intellectual property protection envisages clearly defined originators and owners of knowledge, whereas the concept of community membership is fluid and indigenous knowledge is, by its very nature, open, with the originator(s) lost in the mists of time. The delineation of 'community' presents serious conceptual and practical difficulties as few communities form discrete, easily discernable groups, and most have problematic leadership structures. Benefit sharing is no substitute for governments' responsibility to uplift impoverished communities. Benefit sharing arrangements may be fraught with difficulties but considerations of respect and equity demand that prior informed consent and consultation around commercialisation of knowledge take place with the source community and their government.

レビュー

ユーザーレビュー
GoodReadsのレビューを取得中…
DOGObooksのレビューを取得中…

タグ

すべてのユーザーのタグ (2)

人気のタグを表示: タグリスト | タグクラウド

  • ipr  (by 1 ユーザー)
  • law  (by 1 ユーザー)

類似資料

この資料を含むリスト (1)

リクエストの確認

あなたは既にこの資料をリクエストしている可能性があります。このリクエストを続行してよろしければ、OK を選択してください。

リンクデータ

ウインドウを閉じる

WorldCatにログインしてください 

アカウントをお持ちではないですか?簡単に 無料アカウントを作成することができます。.