컨텐츠로 이동
North-South benefit sharing arrangements in bioprospecting and genetic research: a critical ethical and legal analysis.
닫기해당 항목을 미리보기
확인중입니다…

North-South benefit sharing arrangements in bioprospecting and genetic research: a critical ethical and legal analysis.

저자: U Schüklenk 소속: Centre for Ethics in Public Policy and Corporate Governance, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.; A Kleinsmidt
판/형식: 문서 문서 : 영어
출판:Developing world bioethics, 2006 Dec; 6(3): 122-34
데이터베이스:미국 국립 의학 도서관의 데이터베이스인 MEDLINE®/PubMed®에서
다른 데이터베이스: ECO
요약:
Most pharmaceutical research carried out today is focused on the treatment and management of the lifestyle diseases of the developed world. Diseases that affect mainly poor people are neglected in research advancements in treatment because they cannot generate large financial returns on research and development costs. Benefit sharing arrangements for the use of indigenous resources and genetic research could only  더 읽기…
평가:

(아무런 평가가 없습니다.) 0 리뷰와 함께 - 첫번째로 올려주세요.

다음과 같습니다:

 

&AllPage.SpinnerRetrieving;

도서관에서 사본 찾기

&AllPage.SpinnerRetrieving; 해당항목을 보유하고 있는 도서관을 찾는 중

상세정보

문서 형식: 아티클
모든 저자 / 참여자: U Schüklenk 소속: Centre for Ethics in Public Policy and Corporate Governance, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.; A Kleinsmidt
ISSN:1471-8731
언어 메모: English
고유 식별자: 110505688
메모: 46 refs.
KIE Bib: genetic research
상:

초록:

Most pharmaceutical research carried out today is focused on the treatment and management of the lifestyle diseases of the developed world. Diseases that affect mainly poor people are neglected in research advancements in treatment because they cannot generate large financial returns on research and development costs. Benefit sharing arrangements for the use of indigenous resources and genetic research could only marginally address this gap in research and development in diseases that affect the poor. Benefit sharing as a strategy is conceptually problematic, even if one, as we do, agrees that impoverished indigenous communities should not be exploited and that they should be assisted in improving their living conditions. The accepted concept of intellectual property protection envisages clearly defined originators and owners of knowledge, whereas the concept of community membership is fluid and indigenous knowledge is, by its very nature, open, with the originator(s) lost in the mists of time. The delineation of 'community' presents serious conceptual and practical difficulties as few communities form discrete, easily discernable groups, and most have problematic leadership structures. Benefit sharing is no substitute for governments' responsibility to uplift impoverished communities. Benefit sharing arrangements may be fraught with difficulties but considerations of respect and equity demand that prior informed consent and consultation around commercialisation of knowledge take place with the source community and their government.

리뷰

사용자-기여 리뷰
GoodReads 리뷰 가져오는 중…
DOGObooks 리뷰를 가지고 오는 중…

태그

모든 사용자 태그 (2)

가장 인기있는 태그 보기 태그 리스트 | tag cloud

  • ipr  (By 1 사람)
  • law  (By 1 사람)

유사 항목

이 항목을 가지고 있는 사용자 목록 (1)

요청하신 것을 확인하기

이 항목을 이미 요청하셨을 수도 있습니다. 만약 이 요청을 계속해서 진행하시려면 Ok을 선택하세요.

윈도우 닫기

WorldCat에 로그인 하십시오 

계정이 없으세요? 아주 간단한 절차를 통하여 무료 계정을 만드실 수 있습니다.