doorgaan naar inhoud
North-South benefit sharing arrangements in bioprospecting and genetic research: a critical ethical and legal analysis.
SluitenVoorbeeldweergave van dit item
Bezig met controle...

North-South benefit sharing arrangements in bioprospecting and genetic research: a critical ethical and legal analysis.

Auteur: U Schüklenk Aangesloten bij: Centre for Ethics in Public Policy and Corporate Governance, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.; A Kleinsmidt
Editie/Formaat: Artikel Artikel : Engels
Publicatie:Developing world bioethics, 2006 Dec; 6(3): 122-34
Database:Van MEDLINE®/PubMed®, een database van de Amerikaanse National Library of Medicine.
Overige databases: ECO
Samenvatting:
Most pharmaceutical research carried out today is focused on the treatment and management of the lifestyle diseases of the developed world. Diseases that affect mainly poor people are neglected in research advancements in treatment because they cannot generate large financial returns on research and development costs. Benefit sharing arrangements for the use of indigenous resources and genetic research could only  Meer lezen...
Beoordeling:

(nog niet beoordeeld) 0 met beoordelingen - U bent de eerste

Meer in deze trant

 

&AllPage.SpinnerRetrieving;

Zoeken naar een in de bibliotheek beschikbaar exemplaar

&AllPage.SpinnerRetrieving; Bibliotheken met dit item worden gezocht…

Details

Soort document: Artikel
Alle auteurs / medewerkers: U Schüklenk Aangesloten bij: Centre for Ethics in Public Policy and Corporate Governance, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.; A Kleinsmidt
ISSN:1471-8731
Taalopmerking: English
Uniek kenmerk: 110505688
Opmerkingen: 46 refs.
KIE Bib: genetic research
Onderscheidingen:

Fragment:

Most pharmaceutical research carried out today is focused on the treatment and management of the lifestyle diseases of the developed world. Diseases that affect mainly poor people are neglected in research advancements in treatment because they cannot generate large financial returns on research and development costs. Benefit sharing arrangements for the use of indigenous resources and genetic research could only marginally address this gap in research and development in diseases that affect the poor. Benefit sharing as a strategy is conceptually problematic, even if one, as we do, agrees that impoverished indigenous communities should not be exploited and that they should be assisted in improving their living conditions. The accepted concept of intellectual property protection envisages clearly defined originators and owners of knowledge, whereas the concept of community membership is fluid and indigenous knowledge is, by its very nature, open, with the originator(s) lost in the mists of time. The delineation of 'community' presents serious conceptual and practical difficulties as few communities form discrete, easily discernable groups, and most have problematic leadership structures. Benefit sharing is no substitute for governments' responsibility to uplift impoverished communities. Benefit sharing arrangements may be fraught with difficulties but considerations of respect and equity demand that prior informed consent and consultation around commercialisation of knowledge take place with the source community and their government.

Beoordelingen

Beoordelingen door gebruikers
Beoordelingen van GoodReads worden opgehaald...
Bezig met opvragen DOGObooks-reviews...

Tags

Alle gebruiker-tags (2)

De meest populaire tags bekijken als: Tag-list | Tag-wolk

  • ipr  (door 1 persoon)
  • law  (door 1 persoon)

Vergelijkbare items

Gebruiker-lijsten met dit item (1)

Bevestig deze aanvraag

Misschien heeft u dit item reeds aangevraagd. Selecteer a.u.b. Ok als u toch wilt doorgaan met deze aanvraag.

Gekoppelde data


<http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/110505688>
library:oclcnum"110505688"
owl:sameAs<info:oclcnum/110505688>
rdf:typeschema:Article
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:contributor
schema:creator
schema:datePublished"2006-12"
schema:description"Most pharmaceutical research carried out today is focused on the treatment and management of the lifestyle diseases of the developed world. Diseases that affect mainly poor people are neglected in research advancements in treatment because they cannot generate large financial returns on research and development costs. Benefit sharing arrangements for the use of indigenous resources and genetic research could only marginally address this gap in research and development in diseases that affect the poor. Benefit sharing as a strategy is conceptually problematic, even if one, as we do, agrees that impoverished indigenous communities should not be exploited and that they should be assisted in improving their living conditions. The accepted concept of intellectual property protection envisages clearly defined originators and owners of knowledge, whereas the concept of community membership is fluid and indigenous knowledge is, by its very nature, open, with the originator(s) lost in the mists of time. The delineation of 'community' presents serious conceptual and practical difficulties as few communities form discrete, easily discernable groups, and most have problematic leadership structures. Benefit sharing is no substitute for governments' responsibility to uplift impoverished communities. Benefit sharing arrangements may be fraught with difficulties but considerations of respect and equity demand that prior informed consent and consultation around commercialisation of knowledge take place with the source community and their government."
schema:exampleOfWork<http://worldcat.org/entity/work/id/73720275>
schema:isPartOf
schema:isPartOf
schema:name"North-South benefit sharing arrangements in bioprospecting and genetic research: a critical ethical and legal analysis."
schema:pageStart"122"
schema:url

Content-negotiable representations

Venster sluiten

Meld u aan bij WorldCat 

Heeft u geen account? U kunt eenvoudig een nieuwe gratis account aanmaken.