pular para conteúdo
North-South benefit sharing arrangements in bioprospecting and genetic research: a critical ethical and legal analysis.
FecharVer prévia deste item
Checando...

North-South benefit sharing arrangements in bioprospecting and genetic research: a critical ethical and legal analysis.

Autor: U Schüklenk Afiliação: Centre for Ethics in Public Policy and Corporate Governance, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.; A Kleinsmidt
Edição/Formato Artigo Artigo : Inglês
Publicação:Developing world bioethics, 2006 Dec; 6(3): 122-34
Base de Dados:De MEDLINE®/PubMed®, uma base de dados da Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina dos EUA.
Outras Bases de Dados: ECO
Resumo:
Most pharmaceutical research carried out today is focused on the treatment and management of the lifestyle diseases of the developed world. Diseases that affect mainly poor people are neglected in research advancements in treatment because they cannot generate large financial returns on research and development costs. Benefit sharing arrangements for the use of indigenous resources and genetic research could only  Ler mais...
Classificação:

(ainda não classificado) 0 com críticas - Seja o primeiro.

Mais como este

 

&AllPage.SpinnerRetrieving;

Encontrar uma cópia na biblioteca

&AllPage.SpinnerRetrieving; Encontrando bibliotecas que possuem este item...

Detalhes

Tipo de Documento: Artigo
Todos os Autores / Contribuintes: U Schüklenk Afiliação: Centre for Ethics in Public Policy and Corporate Governance, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.; A Kleinsmidt
ISSN:1471-8731
Nota do Idioma: English
Idenficador Único: 110505688
Notas: 46 refs.
KIE Bib: genetic research
Prêmios:

Resumo:

Most pharmaceutical research carried out today is focused on the treatment and management of the lifestyle diseases of the developed world. Diseases that affect mainly poor people are neglected in research advancements in treatment because they cannot generate large financial returns on research and development costs. Benefit sharing arrangements for the use of indigenous resources and genetic research could only marginally address this gap in research and development in diseases that affect the poor. Benefit sharing as a strategy is conceptually problematic, even if one, as we do, agrees that impoverished indigenous communities should not be exploited and that they should be assisted in improving their living conditions. The accepted concept of intellectual property protection envisages clearly defined originators and owners of knowledge, whereas the concept of community membership is fluid and indigenous knowledge is, by its very nature, open, with the originator(s) lost in the mists of time. The delineation of 'community' presents serious conceptual and practical difficulties as few communities form discrete, easily discernable groups, and most have problematic leadership structures. Benefit sharing is no substitute for governments' responsibility to uplift impoverished communities. Benefit sharing arrangements may be fraught with difficulties but considerations of respect and equity demand that prior informed consent and consultation around commercialisation of knowledge take place with the source community and their government.

Críticas

Críticas contribuídas por usuários
Recuperando críticas GoodReas...
Recuperando comentários DOGObooks

Etiquetas

Etiquetas de todos os usuários (2)

Ver as etiquetas mais populares como: lista de etiquetas | nuvem de etiquetas

  • ipr  (por 1 pessoa)
  • law  (por 1 pessoa)

Ítens Similares

Listas de usuários com este item (1)

Confirmar esta solicitação

Você já pode ter solicitado este item. Por favor, selecione Ok se gostaria de proceder com esta solicitação de qualquer forma.

Dados Ligados


<http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/110505688>
library:oclcnum"110505688"
owl:sameAs<info:oclcnum/110505688>
rdf:typeschema:Article
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:contributor
schema:creator
schema:datePublished"2006-12"
schema:description"Most pharmaceutical research carried out today is focused on the treatment and management of the lifestyle diseases of the developed world. Diseases that affect mainly poor people are neglected in research advancements in treatment because they cannot generate large financial returns on research and development costs. Benefit sharing arrangements for the use of indigenous resources and genetic research could only marginally address this gap in research and development in diseases that affect the poor. Benefit sharing as a strategy is conceptually problematic, even if one, as we do, agrees that impoverished indigenous communities should not be exploited and that they should be assisted in improving their living conditions. The accepted concept of intellectual property protection envisages clearly defined originators and owners of knowledge, whereas the concept of community membership is fluid and indigenous knowledge is, by its very nature, open, with the originator(s) lost in the mists of time. The delineation of 'community' presents serious conceptual and practical difficulties as few communities form discrete, easily discernable groups, and most have problematic leadership structures. Benefit sharing is no substitute for governments' responsibility to uplift impoverished communities. Benefit sharing arrangements may be fraught with difficulties but considerations of respect and equity demand that prior informed consent and consultation around commercialisation of knowledge take place with the source community and their government."
schema:exampleOfWork<http://worldcat.org/entity/work/id/73720275>
schema:isPartOf
schema:isPartOf
schema:name"North-South benefit sharing arrangements in bioprospecting and genetic research: a critical ethical and legal analysis."
schema:pageStart"122"
schema:url

Content-negotiable representations

Close Window

Por favor, conecte-se ao WorldCat 

Não tem uma conta? Você pode facilmente criar uma conta gratuita.