skip to content
Philosophical historicism and the betrayal of first philosophy Preview this item
ClosePreview this item
  • Preview this Item (Questia)

Philosophical historicism and the betrayal of first philosophy

Author: Carl Page
Publisher: University Park, Pa. : University of Pennsylvania Press, ©1995.
Edition/Format:   Book : State or province government publication : EnglishView all editions and formats
Summary:
Philosophical historicism argues that human reason is totally and necessarily bound to the contingencies of its historical context. In the twentieth century, the most arresting development of the historicist attitude has been a growing willingness to include many if not all forms of rational and theoretical activity within the scope of what must be historicized. Most striking of all has been the recent emergence,  Read more...
Rating:

(not yet rated) 0 with reviews - Be the first.

 

Find a copy in the library

Retrieving... Finding libraries that hold this item...

Details

Additional Physical Format: Online version:
Page, Carl, 1957-
Philosophical historicism and the betrayal of first philosophy.
University Park, Pa. : University of Pennsylvania Press, c1995
(OCoLC)622384313
Material Type: Government publication, State or province government publication
Document Type: Book
All Authors / Contributors: Carl Page
ISBN: 0271013303 9780271013305 0271011300 9780271011301
OCLC Number: 29314700
Description: xx, 235 p. ; 24 cm.
Contents: Introduction : Historicism : the new commonplace --
From the logic of history to the historicity of reason --
Reason's inevitable parochiality --
Dialectical difficulties : nihilism and self-refutation --
Heidegger : the metaphysics of finite historicity --
Hegel : history's rational actuality.
Responsibility: Carl Page.

Abstract:

Philosophical historicism argues that human reason is totally and necessarily bound to the contingencies of its historical context. In the twentieth century, the most arresting development of the historicist attitude has been a growing willingness to include many if not all forms of rational and theoretical activity within the scope of what must be historicized. Most striking of all has been the recent emergence, among philosophers, of the view that the activity of human reason in all its possible modes must also be historicized, including the activity of philosophizing itself. This view may be found in writers as diverse as Hans-Georg Gadamer, Richard Rorty, Michel Foucault, and Alasdair MacIntyre. This contemporary view of human reason contrasts with the traditional commitments of "First Philosophy," Aristotle's name for the knowledge of things through their ultimate causes and principles. Philosophical historicism denies that such knowledge may be realized by human beings. The stage is thus set for a "battle of the giants" between two fundamental yet contradictory interpretations of human reason, two views of philosophy. This book challenges the prevailing historicist orthodoxies about the nature of reason and philosophy. It offers the first comprehensive analysis and critique of historicism in its current philosophical form. Can philosophical historicism reasonably justify the interpretation of human reason on which its own objections to First Philosophy are based? While Carl Page ultimately concludes that it cannot, he also seeks to rehabilitate historicism's motivating insights by showing how they derive from questions Hegel and Heidegger raised about reason's relation to history.

Reviews

User-contributed reviews
Retrieving weRead reviews...
Retrieving GoodReads reviews...
Retrieving Amazon reviews...

Tags

Be the first.
Confirm this request

You may have already requested this item. Please select Ok if you would like to proceed with this request anyway.

Close Window

Please sign in to WorldCat 

Don't have an account? You can easily create a free account.