详细书目
| 文件类型: | 书 |
|---|---|
| 所有的著者/提供者: |
Kathleen Fitzpatrick |
| ISBN: | 9780814727874 0814727875 9780814727881 0814727883 9780814728963 0814728960 |
| OCLC号码: | 710019002 |
| 描述: | viii, 245 p. : ill. ; 23 cm. |
| 内容: | Peer review -- Authorship -- Texts -- Preservation -- University. |
| 责任: | Kathleen Fitzpatrick. |
| 更多信息: |
摘要:
评论
出版商概要
Planned Obsolescence is a wonderfully clear and honest assessment of the present state of academic publishing and possible future directions. The digital age offers us a chance to exit the ivory tower and engage in more meaningful collaborations with peers and a more inclusive dialogue with readers. Fitzpatrick's study is a must-read, not just for all of those directly involved - academics, publishers, university administrators, librarians - but also for anybody interested in the future of the humanities." Alessandra Tosi, Times Higher Education "Kathleen Fitzpatrick is one of our most interesting, provocative, knowledgeable, and sane commentators on the future of rewriting, writing, publishing and the academy. Planned Obsolescence is a field guide to the future ways we do our research, communicate, teach, and learn together." Cathy Davidson, Duke University "Kathleen Fitzpatrick is a pioneer of both the theory and practice of peer-to-peer scholarly publishing. This book is the best map yet to the difficult terrain where economies, technologies and cultures of academic communication meet. If there are to be paths to sustainable practices for intelligent life in academia, then we should all follow Fitzpatrick's lead." McKenzie Wark, author of A Hacker Manifesto and Gamer Theory "Fitzpatrick is well qualified to discuss alternate forms of publishing and unexpected futures for the academy...Chapters titled 'Peer Review,' 'Authorship,' 'Texts,' 'Preservation,' and 'The University' methodically dismantle arguments for the status quo, with sections debating accepted beliefs and practices such as the anonymous basis of peer review; recognizable, individual authorship; for-profit university presses; and the rejection of open access as a tenable scholarly publishing model." - Henrietta Thornton-Verma, Library Journal "[A] desire for pre-eminence, authority and disciplinary power - is what blogs and the digital humanities stand against.The point is made concisely by Kathleen Fitzpatrick in her new book, Planned Obsolescence: Publishing, Technology, and the Future of the Academy." Stanely Fish, blogger for The New York Times 再读一些...
标签
相似资料
相关主题:(9)
- Scholarly publishing -- United States.
- Scholarly electronic publishing -- United States.
- Communication in learning and scholarship -- Technological innovations -- United States.
- LAW / Media & the Law.
- SOCIAL SCIENCE / Anthropology / Cultural.
- Elektronisches Publizieren.
- Neue Medien.
- Wissenschaftliche Literatur.
- USA.
这资料的用户列表 (4)
- Check Out(43 资料)
由 StevenJRoberts 已更新 大约2天前
- UO New Anthropology Holdings(196 资料)
由 rigby 已更新 2012-02-15
- UO New Sociology Holdings(130 资料)
由 rigby 已更新 2011-12-08
- Things to Check Out(109 资料)
由 lkrier 已更新 大约6天前
