コンテンツへ移動
Publishing economics : analyses of the academic journal market in economics 資料のプレビュー
閉じる資料のプレビュー
確認中…

Publishing economics : analyses of the academic journal market in economics

著者: Joshua Gans
出版: Cheltenham, UK ; Northampton, MA, USA : E. Elgar, ©2000.
エディション/フォーマット:   書籍 : Englishすべてのエディションとフォーマットを見る
データベース:WorldCat
概要:
"This collection tackles the issues confronting the up and coming economist. The authors include some of the subject's finest luminaries who offer friendly and invaluable advice as well as providing a more light-hearted look at the publication process. Some articles have become classics in their own right. They vary from an examination of seminal (and originally rejected) articles by leading economists to an  続きを読む
評価:

(まだ評価がありません) 0 件のレビュー - まずはあなたから!

件名
関連情報

 

オンラインで入手

この資料へのリンク

オフラインで入手

&AllPage.SpinnerRetrieving; この資料の所蔵館を検索中…

詳細

ジャンル/形式: Aufsatzsammlung
その他のフォーマット: Online version:
Publishing economics.
Cheltenham, UK ; Northampton, MA, USA : E. Elgar, c2000
(OCoLC)606496103
資料の種類: インターネット資料
ドキュメントの種類: 図書, インターネットリソース
すべての著者/寄与者: Joshua Gans
ISBN: 1840642831 9781840642834 1840649321 9781840649321
OCLC No.: 43036900
形態 xiv, 294 p. : ill. ; 25 cm.
コンテンツ: Life among the econ / Axel Leijonhufvud --
The young economist's guide to professional etiquette / Daniel S. Hamermesh --
How are the mighty fallen: rejected classic articles by leading economists / Sharon M. Oster and Daniel S. Hamermesh --
Facts and myths about refereeing / Daniel S. Hamermesh --
Is there value added from the review process in economics? preliminary evidence from authors / David N. Laband --
The effects of double-blind versus single-blind reviewing: experimental evidence from the American economic review / Rebecca M. Blank --
Favoritism versus search for good papers: empirical evidence regarding the behavior of journal editors / David N. Laband and Michael J. Piette --
Why referees are not paid (enough) / Maxim Engers and Joshua S. Gans.
責任者: edited by Joshua S. Gans.

概要:

"This collection tackles the issues confronting the up and coming economist. The authors include some of the subject's finest luminaries who offer friendly and invaluable advice as well as providing a more light-hearted look at the publication process. Some articles have become classics in their own right. They vary from an examination of seminal (and originally rejected) articles by leading economists to an analysis of why referees are not adequately paid. The tools of both economic theory and econometrics are applied to uncover some home truths and, as a result, these papers provide new insights into the nature of economic discourse."--BOOK JACKET.

レビュー

ユーザーレビュー
GoodReadsのレビューを取得中…
DOGObooksのレビューを取得中…

タグ

まずはあなたから!
リクエストの確認

あなたは既にこの資料をリクエストしている可能性があります。このリクエストを続行してよろしければ、OK を選択してください。

リンクデータ


<http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/43036900>
library:oclcnum"43036900"
library:placeOfPublication
rdf:typeschema:Place
schema:name"Northampton, MA, USA"
library:placeOfPublication
library:placeOfPublication
owl:sameAs<info:oclcnum/43036900>
rdf:typeschema:Book
rdfs:seeAlso
schema:about
schema:about
rdf:typeschema:Intangible
schema:name"Economie politique--Edition."
schema:about
rdf:typeschema:Intangible
schema:name"Économie politique--Édition."
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
rdf:typeschema:Intangible
schema:name"Économie politique - Édition."
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
rdf:typeschema:Intangible
schema:name"Wirtschaftswissenschaften."
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
rdf:typeschema:Intangible
schema:name"Economie politique - Edition."
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:contributor
schema:copyrightYear"2000"
schema:datePublished"2000"
schema:description"Life among the econ / Axel Leijonhufvud -- The young economist's guide to professional etiquette / Daniel S. Hamermesh -- How are the mighty fallen: rejected classic articles by leading economists / Sharon M. Oster and Daniel S. Hamermesh -- Facts and myths about refereeing / Daniel S. Hamermesh -- Is there value added from the review process in economics? preliminary evidence from authors / David N. Laband -- The effects of double-blind versus single-blind reviewing: experimental evidence from the American economic review / Rebecca M. Blank -- Favoritism versus search for good papers: empirical evidence regarding the behavior of journal editors / David N. Laband and Michael J. Piette -- Why referees are not paid (enough) / Maxim Engers and Joshua S. Gans."
schema:exampleOfWork<http://worldcat.org/entity/work/id/837024741>
schema:inLanguage"en"
schema:name"Publishing economics : analyses of the academic journal market in economics"
schema:numberOfPages"294"
schema:publisher
schema:reviews
rdf:typeschema:Review
schema:itemReviewed<http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/43036900>
schema:reviewBody""This collection tackles the issues confronting the up and coming economist. The authors include some of the subject's finest luminaries who offer friendly and invaluable advice as well as providing a more light-hearted look at the publication process. Some articles have become classics in their own right. They vary from an examination of seminal (and originally rejected) articles by leading economists to an analysis of why referees are not adequately paid. The tools of both economic theory and econometrics are applied to uncover some home truths and, as a result, these papers provide new insights into the nature of economic discourse."--BOOK JACKET."
schema:workExample
schema:workExample
schema:workExample
schema:workExample

Content-negotiable representations

ウインドウを閉じる

WorldCatにログインしてください 

アカウントをお持ちではないですか?簡単に 無料アカウントを作成することができます。.