跳到内容
Re-writing the French revolutionary tradition 预览资料
关闭预览资料
  • 预览此资料(Questia)

Re-writing the French revolutionary tradition

著者: R S Alexander
出版商: Cambridge, UK ; New York, N.Y., USA : Cambridge University Press, 2003.
丛书: New studies in European history.
版本/格式:   图书 : 英语查看所有的版本和格式
提要:
"This book examines the politics of the French Revolutionary tradition during the Bourbon Restoration and the early July Monarchy. Robert Alexander argues that progressive political change was achieved by legal grassroots organization and persuasion - rather than the Revolutionary tradition of conspiracy and armed insurrection - and that, moreover, political struggle was not confined to the elite, as common material  再读一些...
评估:

(尚未评估) 0 附有评论 - 争取成为第一个。

 

在图书馆查找

正在检索... 正在查找有这资料的图书馆...

详细书目

材料类型: 互联网资源
文件类型: 书, 互联网资源
所有的著者/提供者: R S Alexander
ISBN: 0521801222 9780521801225
OCLC号码: 52947056
描述: xi, 385 p. : maps ; 24 cm.
内容: False starts and uncertain beginnings, from the first Restoration (May 1814) to the elections of September 1816 --
Battle commences, from September 1816 to July 1820 --
Self-defeating opposition, from July 1820 to February 1824 --
Back on track, from March 1824 to January 1828 --
Towards victory? January 1828 to July 1830 --
Aftermath: liberal opposition and the July Revolution.
丛书名: New studies in European history.
责任: Robert Alexander.
更多信息:

摘要:

"This book examines the politics of the French Revolutionary tradition during the Bourbon Restoration and the early July Monarchy. Robert Alexander argues that progressive political change was achieved by legal grassroots organization and persuasion - rather than the Revolutionary tradition of conspiracy and armed insurrection - and that, moreover, political struggle was not confined to the elite, as common material interests and values linked the electorate to the disenfranchised. Battle between the advocates of national and royal sovereignty constituted the principal dynamic of the period, and fostered significant developments in party formation previously unrecognized by historians. To substantiate his claims, the author analyses relations between the Liberal Opposition, ultraroyalists and the state, concluding that although Liberals triumphed in the 1830 Revolution, thereafter they contributed to the destabilization that produced an immobile Orleanist regime. Nevertheless, they had pioneered a model for change which could successfully adapt pursuit of reform to longing for civil order."--BOOK JACKET.

评论

用户提供的评论
正在检索weRead中的评论...
正在获取GoodReads评论...
正在检索Amazon中的评论...

标签

争取是第一个!
确认申请

您可能已经申请过这份资料。如果还是想申请,请选确认。

关闭窗口

请登入WorldCat 

没有张号吗?很容易就可以 建立免费的账号.