skip to content
The role of the Supreme Court in American politics : the least dangerous branch? Preview this item
ClosePreview this item
Checking...

The role of the Supreme Court in American politics : the least dangerous branch?

Author: Richard L Pacelle
Publisher: Princeton, N.J. : Recording for the Blind & Dyslexic, 2005.
Series: Dilemmas in American politics.
Edition/Format:   Audiobook on CD : CD audio : English
Database:WorldCat
Summary:
When the Supreme Court effectively decided the presidential election of 2000, it's decision illustrated a classic question in American politics: what is the appropriate role for the Supreme Court? The dilemma is between judicial activism, the Court's willingness to make significant changes in public policy, and judicial restraint, the Court's willingness to confine the use and extent of its power. While the Framers  Read more...
Rating:

(not yet rated) 0 with reviews - Be the first.

Subjects
More like this

 

Find a copy in the library

&AllPage.SpinnerRetrieving; Finding libraries that hold this item...

Details

Material Type: Audio book, etc.
Document Type: Sound Recording
All Authors / Contributors: Richard L Pacelle
OCLC Number: 60343469
Notes: Originally published: Boulder, Colo. : Westview Press, c2002.
Description: Sound disc : digital, mono. ; 4 3/4 in.
Contents: Introduction: A five-week election night ends up in the Supreme Court --
The Supreme Court, law or politics? --
The historical dimension of the dilemma --
The Democratic dimension of the dilemma, unelected policymaking --
The institutional dimension of the dilemma, constitutional and self-imposed limitations --
The judicial capacity dimension of the dilemma, does the Supreme Court have the ability to make policy --
The individual dimension of the dilemma, the bases for decisions --
Toward resolving the dilemma, a return to the recent past.
Series Title: Dilemmas in American politics.
Responsibility: Richard L. Pacelle, Jr.

Abstract:

When the Supreme Court effectively decided the presidential election of 2000, it's decision illustrated a classic question in American politics: what is the appropriate role for the Supreme Court? The dilemma is between judicial activism, the Court's willingness to make significant changes in public policy, and judicial restraint, the Court's willingness to confine the use and extent of its power. While the Framers of the Constitution felt that the judiciary would be the "least dangerous branch" of government, many have come to the conclusion that courts govern America, a notion at odds with democratic government. [In this book, the author] traces the historical ebb and flow of the Court's role in the critical issues of American politics: slavery, free speech, religion, abortion, and affirmative action. [The author] examines the arguments for judicial restraint, including that unelected judges making policy runs against democratic principles, and the arguments for judicial activism, including the important role the court has played as a protector of minority rights. [The author] suggests that there needs to be a balance between judicial activism and restraint in light of the constraints on the institution and its power. -Back cover.

Reviews

User-contributed reviews
Retrieving GoodReads reviews...
Retrieving DOGObooks reviews...

Tags

Be the first.
Confirm this request

You may have already requested this item. Please select Ok if you would like to proceed with this request anyway.

Linked Data


<http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/60343469>
library:oclcnum"60343469"
library:placeOfPublication
library:placeOfPublication
owl:sameAs<info:oclcnum/60343469>
rdf:typej.2:Audiobook
rdf:typeschema:Book
rdf:typej.2:Compact_Disc
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:creator
schema:datePublished"2005"
schema:description"Introduction: A five-week election night ends up in the Supreme Court -- The Supreme Court, law or politics? -- The historical dimension of the dilemma -- The Democratic dimension of the dilemma, unelected policymaking -- The institutional dimension of the dilemma, constitutional and self-imposed limitations -- The judicial capacity dimension of the dilemma, does the Supreme Court have the ability to make policy -- The individual dimension of the dilemma, the bases for decisions -- Toward resolving the dilemma, a return to the recent past."
schema:description"When the Supreme Court effectively decided the presidential election of 2000, it's decision illustrated a classic question in American politics: what is the appropriate role for the Supreme Court? The dilemma is between judicial activism, the Court's willingness to make significant changes in public policy, and judicial restraint, the Court's willingness to confine the use and extent of its power. While the Framers of the Constitution felt that the judiciary would be the "least dangerous branch" of government, many have come to the conclusion that courts govern America, a notion at odds with democratic government. [In this book, the author] traces the historical ebb and flow of the Court's role in the critical issues of American politics: slavery, free speech, religion, abortion, and affirmative action. [The author] examines the arguments for judicial restraint, including that unelected judges making policy runs against democratic principles, and the arguments for judicial activism, including the important role the court has played as a protector of minority rights. [The author] suggests that there needs to be a balance between judicial activism and restraint in light of the constraints on the institution and its power. -Back cover."
schema:exampleOfWork<http://worldcat.org/entity/work/id/1152535481>
schema:inLanguage"en"
schema:name"The role of the Supreme Court in American politics the least dangerous branch?"
schema:publisher
schema:url

Content-negotiable representations

Close Window

Please sign in to WorldCat 

Don't have an account? You can easily create a free account.