跳至内容
View online Sociological implications of scientific publishing:... 線上預覽
關閉線上預覽
正在查...

Sociological implications of scientific publishing: Open access, science, society, democracy and the digital divide

作者: Herb, Ulrich
出版商: Saarländische Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek Zentrale Einrichtungen. Zentrale Verwaltung 2010
版本/格式:   可下載的文章 : 英語
刊登於:Zentrale Einrichtungen. Zentrale Verwaltung
資料庫:WorldCat
提要:
Claims for open access are mostly underpinned with 1. science—related arguments (open access accelerates scientific communication); 2. financial arguments (open access relieves the serials crisis); 3. social arguments (open access reduces the digital divide); 4. democracy—related arguments (open access facilitates participation); and, 5. socio—political arguments (open access levels disparities). Using sociological  再讀一些...
評定級別:

(尚未評分) 0 附有評論 - 成爲第一個。

主題
更多類似這樣的

 

在線上查詢

與資料的連結

在圖書館查詢

&AllPage.SpinnerRetrieving; 正在查詢有此資料的圖書館...

詳細書目

類型/形式: Article
資料類型: 網際網路資源
文件類型: 網路資源, 文章
所有的作者/貢獻者: Herb, Ulrich
OCLC系統控制編碼: 697707150
語言註釋: English
注意: application/pdf

摘要:

Claims for open access are mostly underpinned with 1. science—related arguments (open access accelerates scientific communication); 2. financial arguments (open access relieves the serials crisis); 3. social arguments (open access reduces the digital divide); 4. democracy—related arguments (open access facilitates participation); and, 5. socio—political arguments (open access levels disparities). Using sociological concepts and notions, this article focuses strongly on Pierre Bourdieu';s theory of (scientific) capital and its implications for the acceptance of open access, Michel Foucault';s discourse analysis and the implications of open access for the concept of the digital divide. Bourdieu';s theory of capital implies that the acceptance of open access depends on the logic of power and the accumulation of scientific capital. It does not depend on slogans derived from hagiographic self—perceptions of science (e.g., the acceleration of scientific communication) and scientists (e.g., their will to share their information freely). According to Bourdieu';s theory, it is crucial for open access (and associated concepts like alternative impact metrics) to understand how scientists perceive its potential influence on existing processes of capital accumulation and how open access will affect their demand for status. Foucault';s discourse analysis suggests that open access may intensify disparities, scientocentrism and ethnocentrism. Additionally, several concepts from the philosophy of sciences (Popper, Kuhn, Feyerabend) and their implicit connection to the concept of open access are described in this paper.

評論

讀者提供的評論
正在擷取GoodReads評論...
正在擷取DOGObooks的評論

標籤

所有的讀者標籤 (1)

檢視最熱門的標籤,呈現的形式是: 標籤我的最愛清單 | 標籤雲(tag cloud)

確認申請

你可能已經申請過這份資料。若還是想申請,請選確認。

連結資料


<http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/697707150>
library:oclcnum"697707150"
owl:sameAs<info:oclcnum/697707150>
rdf:typeschema:MediaObject
rdf:typej.2:Web_document
rdf:typeschema:Article
schema:creator
schema:datePublished"2010"
schema:exampleOfWork<http://worldcat.org/entity/work/id/771307237>
schema:genre"Article"
schema:inLanguage"en"
schema:isPartOf
<http://worldcat.org/issn/>
rdf:typeschema:Periodical
schema:name"Zentrale Einrichtungen. Zentrale Verwaltung"
schema:name"Sociological implications of scientific publishing: Open access, science, society, democracy and the digital divide"
schema:publisher
schema:publisher
schema:url<http://scidok.sulb.uni-saarland.de/volltexte/2010/3488/>
schema:url

Content-negotiable representations

關閉視窗

請登入WorldCat 

没有帳號嗎?你可很容易的 建立免費的帳號.