skip to content
Štiri Deleuzove formule
ClosePreview this item
Checking...

Štiri Deleuzove formule

Author: Peter Klepec
Edition/Format:   Article : Slovenian
Publication:Problemi, Let. 37, št. 1/2 (1999), str. 111-122
Database:WorldCat
Summary:
Avtor obravnava Deleuzovo interpretacijo Kanta v Critique et clinique, kjer Deleuze celotno K. filozofsko podvzetje zvede na štiri formule: čas, ki je iz tira, Jaz je drugi, skrivnostni in nadjazovski zakon, neskladno skladje oziroma osamosvojitev disonance. Avtorjeva teza je v tem, da so omenjene formule v resnici štiri temeljne formule D. filozofije, ki skupaj tvorijo Deleuzov silogizem: na začetku ni Eno,
Rating:

(not yet rated) 0 with reviews - Be the first.

Subjects
More like this

 

&AllPage.SpinnerRetrieving;

Find a copy in the library

&AllPage.SpinnerRetrieving; Finding libraries that hold this item...

Details

Document Type: Article
All Authors / Contributors: Peter Klepec
ISSN:0555-2419
OCLC Number: 444490822
Description: str. 111-122.
Responsibility: Peter Klepec.

Abstract:

Avtor obravnava Deleuzovo interpretacijo Kanta v Critique et clinique, kjer Deleuze celotno K. filozofsko podvzetje zvede na štiri formule: čas, ki je iz tira, Jaz je drugi, skrivnostni in nadjazovski zakon, neskladno skladje oziroma osamosvojitev disonance. Avtorjeva teza je v tem, da so omenjene formule v resnici štiri temeljne formule D. filozofije, ki skupaj tvorijo Deleuzov silogizem: na začetku ni Eno, pač pa Dvojica, razcep časa, ki za seboj potegne tudi razcep Jaza. Če Boga ni, potem je vse prepovedano - odtod nadjazovski Zakon, zakon norega postajanja, ki je za Deleuza vselej postajanje mnoštva. In ker mnoštvo za Deleuza nikoli ne tvori sklenjene in skladne celote, je naloga filozofije pričati o tem neskladju.

Author deals with Deleuze's interpretation of Kant in Critique et clinique. Deleuze reduced Kant's entire philosophical project to four formulas: time which is out of joint, the I which is an other, the Law of the mysterious superego, the discordant accord of Kant's emancipation of dissonance. The author claims that these formulas are in fact the four basic formulas of d. philosophy. They form what author calls the Deleuzian syllogism: in the beginning there is not One, but Two, the splitting of time which implies the split I. If the is no God, then everything is forbidden, which means that there is a superego Law, the Law of mad becoming which is for D. always a becoming of multiplicity. Since multiplicity as such never forms a complete and harmonic Whole, philosophy as defined by Deleuze has to bear witness to this disharmony.

Reviews

User-contributed reviews
Retrieving GoodReads reviews...
Retrieving DOGObooks reviews...

Tags

Be the first.

Similar Items

Confirm this request

You may have already requested this item. Please select Ok if you would like to proceed with this request anyway.

Linked Data


<http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/444490822>
library:oclcnum"444490822"
library:placeOfPublication
owl:sameAs<info:oclcnum/444490822>
rdf:typeschema:Article
schema:author
schema:datePublished"1999"
schema:description"Author deals with Deleuze's interpretation of Kant in Critique et clinique. Deleuze reduced Kant's entire philosophical project to four formulas: time which is out of joint, the I which is an other, the Law of the mysterious superego, the discordant accord of Kant's emancipation of dissonance. The author claims that these formulas are in fact the four basic formulas of d. philosophy. They form what author calls the Deleuzian syllogism: in the beginning there is not One, but Two, the splitting of time which implies the split I. If the is no God, then everything is forbidden, which means that there is a superego Law, the Law of mad becoming which is for D. always a becoming of multiplicity. Since multiplicity as such never forms a complete and harmonic Whole, philosophy as defined by Deleuze has to bear witness to this disharmony."@sl
schema:description"Avtor obravnava Deleuzovo interpretacijo Kanta v Critique et clinique, kjer Deleuze celotno K. filozofsko podvzetje zvede na štiri formule: čas, ki je iz tira, Jaz je drugi, skrivnostni in nadjazovski zakon, neskladno skladje oziroma osamosvojitev disonance. Avtorjeva teza je v tem, da so omenjene formule v resnici štiri temeljne formule D. filozofije, ki skupaj tvorijo Deleuzov silogizem: na začetku ni Eno, pač pa Dvojica, razcep časa, ki za seboj potegne tudi razcep Jaza. Če Boga ni, potem je vse prepovedano - odtod nadjazovski Zakon, zakon norega postajanja, ki je za Deleuza vselej postajanje mnoštva. In ker mnoštvo za Deleuza nikoli ne tvori sklenjene in skladne celote, je naloga filozofije pričati o tem neskladju."@sl
schema:exampleOfWork<http://worldcat.org/entity/work/id/329835610>
schema:inLanguage"sl"
schema:name"Štiri Deleuzove formule"@sl
schema:url

Content-negotiable representations

Close Window

Please sign in to WorldCat 

Don't have an account? You can easily create a free account.