跳到内容
Tailed Frog Tadpoles Differentially Alter Their Feeding Behavior in Response to Non-Visual Cues from Four Predators
关闭预览资料

Tailed Frog Tadpoles Differentially Alter Their Feeding Behavior in Response to Non-Visual Cues from Four Predators

著者: Jack W Feminella; Charles P Hawkins
版本/格式: 文章 文章 : 英语
刊登在:Journal of the North American Benthological Society, Jun., 1994, vol. 13, no. 2, p. 310-320
数据库:JSTOR
其它数据库: British Library SerialsArticleFirst
提要:
 再读一些...
评估:

(尚未评估) 0 附有评论 - 争取成为第一个。

 

在线查找

与期刊/刊物的链接

在图书馆查找

正在检索... 正在查找有这资料的图书馆...

详细书目

文件类型: 文章
所有的著者/提供者: Jack W Feminella; Charles P Hawkins
ISSN:0887-3593
OCLC号码: 478651859
语言注释: English
注意: Fig. 1. Photograph of twelve paired enclosures (dimensions: 103 cm length × 32.5 cm diameter) used to confine tailed frog tadpoles and their predators in Clearwater Creek. Arrow shows direction of flow. For each predator detection experiment (salamanders, trout, or sculpins), predators were placed in three of the six upstream enclosures; tadpoles were placed into each of the six downstream enclosures. Coarse mesh covers used to isolate predators in upstream enclosures have been removed.
Fig. 2. Diel feeding periodicity of Ascaphus truei tadpoles. Activity was determined by counting the number of individuals that emerged from crevices under cobbles and were visible on periphyton-covered cobble surfaces, and expressing these as a percentage of the total number of tadpoles present. Tadpoles were not exposed to predators during any of these observations (n = 32). Each increment on x-axis = 30 min.
奖励:

摘要:

Tadpoles of the tailed frog (Ascaphus truei) are common in riffles within many small, high-gradient streams of the Pacific Northwest (United States and southern Canada), where they typically graze periphyton from exposed cobbles. We conducted field observations and experiments in Clearwater Creek, southwestern Washington, to determine if tadpoles would reduce their feeding activity (i.e., emergence from crevices to graze periphyton) in the presence of non-visual cues released from each of four aquatic predators: giant salamanders (Dicamptodon spp.), cutthroat trout (Salmo clarki), brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis), and shorthead sculpin (Cottus confusus). In absence of predators, tadpoles usually emerged from under cobbles to feed at night (2000-0100 h), and spent the remainder of the 24-h interval hidden in crevices. In the presence of giant salamanders, cutthroat trout, and brook trout that were all confined within separate, in situ enclosures immediately upstream of tadpoles, tadpole activity was reduced two-, three-, and six-fold, respectively, compared with predator-free controls. In contrast, tadpoles appeared unable to detect upstream sculpins. Subsequent consumption experiments in the laboratory showed that salamanders, sculpins, and cutthroat trout all were capable of consuming tadpoles in both structurally simple and complex habitats. We hypothesize that the inability of tadpoles to detect predaceous sculpins may explain why tailed frog tadpoles are largely absent from lower-gradient streams where sculpins are often abundant.

评论

用户提供的评论
正在检索weRead中的评论...
正在获取GoodReads评论...
正在检索Amazon中的评论...

标签

争取是第一个!
确认申请

您可能已经申请过这份资料。如果还是想申请,请选确认。

关闭窗口

请登入WorldCat 

没有张号吗?很容易就可以 建立免费的账号.