跳到内容
Theory of mind and central coherence in adults with high-functioning autism or Asperger syndrome.
关闭预览资料
正在查...

Theory of mind and central coherence in adults with high-functioning autism or Asperger syndrome.

著者: R Beaumont 附属: School of Psychology, University of Queensland, Australia. renae@psy.uq.edu.au; P Newcombe
版本/格式: 文章 文章 : 英语
刊登在:Autism : the international journal of research and practice, 2006 Jul; 10(4): 365-82
数据库:取自MEDLINE®/PubMed®,这是美国医学图书馆的一个数据库。
其它数据库: British Library SerialsECOERIC
提要:
The study investigated theory of mind and central coherence abilities in adults with high-functioning autism (HFA) or Asperger syndrome (AS) using naturalistic tasks. Twenty adults with HFA/AS correctly answered significantly fewer theory of mind questions than 20 controls on a forced-choice response task. On a narrative task, there were no differences in the proportion of mental state words between the two groups,  再读一些...
评估:

(尚未评估) 0 附有评论 - 争取成为第一个。

 

&AllPage.SpinnerRetrieving;

在图书馆查找

&AllPage.SpinnerRetrieving; 正在查找有这资料的图书馆...

详细书目

文件类型: 文章
所有的著者/提供者: R Beaumont 附属: School of Psychology, University of Queensland, Australia. renae@psy.uq.edu.au; P Newcombe
ISSN:1362-3613
语言注释: English
专有的标识符 109876279
奖励:

摘要:

The study investigated theory of mind and central coherence abilities in adults with high-functioning autism (HFA) or Asperger syndrome (AS) using naturalistic tasks. Twenty adults with HFA/AS correctly answered significantly fewer theory of mind questions than 20 controls on a forced-choice response task. On a narrative task, there were no differences in the proportion of mental state words between the two groups, although the participants with HFA/AS were less inclined to provide explanations for characters' mental states. No between-group differences existed on the central coherence questions of the forced-choice response task, and the participants with HFA/AS included an equivalent proportion of explanations for non-mental state phenomena in their narratives as did controls. These results support the theory of mind deficit account of autism spectrum disorders, and suggest that difficulties in mental state attribution cannot be exclusively attributed to weak central coherence.

评论

用户提供的评论
正在获取GoodReads评论...
正在检索DOGObooks的评论

标签

争取是第一个!
确认申请

你可能已经申请过这份资料。如果还是想申请,请选确认。

链接数据


<http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/109876279>
library:oclcnum"109876279"
owl:sameAs<info:oclcnum/109876279>
rdf:typeschema:Article
schema:about
schema:contributor
schema:creator
schema:datePublished"2006-07"
schema:description"The study investigated theory of mind and central coherence abilities in adults with high-functioning autism (HFA) or Asperger syndrome (AS) using naturalistic tasks. Twenty adults with HFA/AS correctly answered significantly fewer theory of mind questions than 20 controls on a forced-choice response task. On a narrative task, there were no differences in the proportion of mental state words between the two groups, although the participants with HFA/AS were less inclined to provide explanations for characters' mental states. No between-group differences existed on the central coherence questions of the forced-choice response task, and the participants with HFA/AS included an equivalent proportion of explanations for non-mental state phenomena in their narratives as did controls. These results support the theory of mind deficit account of autism spectrum disorders, and suggest that difficulties in mental state attribution cannot be exclusively attributed to weak central coherence."
schema:exampleOfWork<http://worldcat.org/entity/work/id/72896068>
schema:isPartOf
<http://worldcat.org/issn/1362-3613>
rdf:typeschema:Periodical
schema:name"Autism : the international journal of research and practice"
schema:isPartOf
schema:name"Theory of mind and central coherence in adults with high-functioning autism or Asperger syndrome."
schema:pageStart"365"
schema:url

Content-negotiable representations

关闭窗口

请登入WorldCat 

没有张号吗?很容易就可以 建立免费的账号.