skip to content
'They should hire the one with the best score': White sensitivity to qualification differences in affirmative action hiring decisions
ClosePreview this item
Checking...

'They should hire the one with the best score': White sensitivity to qualification differences in affirmative action hiring decisions

Author: Brent Berry; Eduardo Bonilla-Silva
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
Edition/Format: Article Article : EN
Publication:Ethnic and Racial Studies, 31, no. 2 (2008): 215-242
Database:ArticleFirst
Other Databases: Elsevier
Rating:

(not yet rated) 0 with reviews - Be the first.

More like this

 

&AllPage.SpinnerRetrieving;

Find a copy online

Links to this journal/publication

Find a copy in the library

&AllPage.SpinnerRetrieving; Finding libraries that hold this item...

Details

Document Type: Article
All Authors / Contributors: Brent Berry; Eduardo Bonilla-Silva
ISSN:0141-9870
Language Note: EN
Unique Identifier: 361169729
Awards:

Reviews

User-contributed reviews
Retrieving GoodReads reviews...
Retrieving DOGObooks reviews...

Tags

All user tags (2)

View most popular tags as: tag list | tag cloud

Similar Items

User lists with this item (1)

Confirm this request

You may have already requested this item. Please select Ok if you would like to proceed with this request anyway.

Linked Data


<http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/361169729>
library:oclcnum"361169729"
owl:sameAs<info:oclcnum/361169729>
rdf:typeschema:Article
schema:contributor
schema:creator
schema:datePublished"2008-02-01"
schema:description"This paper uses innovative survey questions from the 1998 Detroit Area Study to examine how whites communicate their views about racial matters across three affirmative action hiring scenarios. Results suggest that most whites prefer explanations for not hiring blacks based on the abstract and decontextualized application of the principles of liberalism. Justifications that were initially offered emphasizing qualification thresholds, broad criteria, and contextual concerns, usually in support of hiring the black applicant, were largely withdrawn when the scenario was changed from one with equal scores to one with scores slightly favouring the white applicant. Concrete and contextualized concerns about workforce homogeneity and the slightness of score differences were raised in a conciliatory manner when scores were equal, but then were seldom maintained when scores favoured the white candidate. Whites also more readily voiced opposition when the reason for hire was changed from 'diversity' to 'make up for past discrimination', offering 'reasonable' responses about 'the past is the past' that don't deny concrete historical events, but dismiss their connection to today's racial order. Taken together, the evidence suggests that the language of universalism and minimization of racism allow most whites to communicate their views about affirmative action using rhetorical strategies that seem reasonable and moral."
schema:exampleOfWork<http://worldcat.org/entity/work/id/151765093>
schema:isPartOf
schema:name"'They should hire the one with the best score': White sensitivity to qualification differences in affirmative action hiring decisions"
schema:pageStart"215"
schema:publisher
schema:url

Content-negotiable representations

Close Window

Please sign in to WorldCat 

Don't have an account? You can easily create a free account.