コンテンツへ移動
The trouble with resurrection : from Paul to the Fourth Gospel 資料のプレビュー
閉じる資料のプレビュー
確認中…

The trouble with resurrection : from Paul to the Fourth Gospel

著者: Bernard Brandon Scott
出版: Salem, Or. : Polebridge Press, ©2010.
エディション/フォーマット:   書籍 : Englishすべてのエディションとフォーマットを見る
データベース:WorldCat
概要:
The term "resurrection" has come to stand for what Christianity is all about. But a close look reveals that it should not be understood monolithically, but rather as a pluralistic and diverse phenomenon. Early Christian communities were convinced that Rome had not defeated Jesus when they crucified him. They employed a whole host of metaphors to express that conviction. The use of the single term "resurrection" to  続きを読む
評価:

(まだ評価がありません) 0 件のレビュー - 是非あなたから!

件名:
関連情報:

 

オフラインで入手

&AllPage.SpinnerRetrieving; この資料の所蔵館を検索中…

詳細

関連の人物: Jesus Christ
ドキュメントの種類: 図書
すべての著者/寄与者: Bernard Brandon Scott
ISBN: 9781598150209 1598150200
OCLC No.: 663459386
物理形態: xi, 251 p. ; 23 cm.
コンテンツ: Introduction: the problem with resurrection ----
1. The first reference ---
2. After death in ancient Israel ---
3. Awakening from the dead ---
4. The dead in the anointed will rise first ---
5. An experience of Jesus raised from the dead ---
6. The earliest resurrection narrative? ---
7. The list ---
8. He has been seen ---
9. With what kind of body? ---
10. Assumption ---
11. Empty tomb ---
12. Mathew and Lukeʹs take on Mark ---
13. The empty tomb, again ---
14. Mary Magdalene, first? ---
15. What happened? ----
Postscript: reclaiming resurrection.
責任者: Bernard Brandon Scott.

概要:

The term "resurrection" has come to stand for what Christianity is all about. But a close look reveals that it should not be understood monolithically, but rather as a pluralistic and diverse phenomenon. Early Christian communities were convinced that Rome had not defeated Jesus when they crucified him. They employed a whole host of metaphors to express that conviction. The use of the single term "resurrection" to cover the phenomenon is a mistake-one that has tyrannized Christianity. Furthermore, most Christians believe in a physical resurrection, although Paul clearly calls this into question. Once that tradition became fixed, it provided the lens through which everything else was viewed-and distorted. The purpose of this book is not to say whether Jesus arose from the grave on the third day, or whether such an event is impossible. Rather, by examining the so-called resurrection stories in chronological order, it aspires to prompt readers to consider questions such as: a- what does the New Testament really say about the resurrection; b- what is the influence of Judaism on Christian belief in the resurrection; c- how did the resurrection become the central belief in Christianity; d- why did early Christians choose to believe in the resurrection; and e- and why is resurrection not the right word.

レビュー

ユーザーレビュー
GoodReadsのレビューを取得中…
DOGObooksのレビューを取得中…

タグ

まずはあなたから!

類似資料

関連件名:(3)

この資料を含むリスト (2)

リクエストの確認

あなたは既にこの資料をリクエストしている可能性があります。このリクエストを続行してよろしければ、OK を選択してください。

リンクデータ


<http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/663459386>
library:oclcnum"663459386"
library:placeOfPublication
library:placeOfPublication
owl:sameAs<info:oclcnum/663459386>
rdf:typeschema:Book
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:copyrightYear"2010"
schema:creator
schema:datePublished"2010"
schema:description"The term "resurrection" has come to stand for what Christianity is all about. But a close look reveals that it should not be understood monolithically, but rather as a pluralistic and diverse phenomenon. Early Christian communities were convinced that Rome had not defeated Jesus when they crucified him. They employed a whole host of metaphors to express that conviction. The use of the single term "resurrection" to cover the phenomenon is a mistake-one that has tyrannized Christianity. Furthermore, most Christians believe in a physical resurrection, although Paul clearly calls this into question. Once that tradition became fixed, it provided the lens through which everything else was viewed-and distorted. The purpose of this book is not to say whether Jesus arose from the grave on the third day, or whether such an event is impossible. Rather, by examining the so-called resurrection stories in chronological order, it aspires to prompt readers to consider questions such as: a- what does the New Testament really say about the resurrection; b- what is the influence of Judaism on Christian belief in the resurrection; c- how did the resurrection become the central belief in Christianity; d- why did early Christians choose to believe in the resurrection; and e- and why is resurrection not the right word."@en
schema:exampleOfWork<http://worldcat.org/entity/work/id/629085748>
schema:genre"Criticism, interpretation, etc."@en
schema:inLanguage"en"
schema:name"The trouble with resurrection : from Paul to the Fourth Gospel"@en
schema:numberOfPages"251"
schema:publisher
schema:url
schema:workExample

Content-negotiable representations

ウインドウを閉じる

WorldCatにログインしてください 

アカウントをお持ちではないですか?簡単に 無料アカウントを作成することができます。.