pular para conteúdo
The trouble with resurrection : from Paul to the Fourth Gospel Ver prévia deste item
FecharVer prévia deste item
Checando...

The trouble with resurrection : from Paul to the Fourth Gospel

Autor: Bernard Brandon Scott
Editora: Salem, Or. : Polebridge Press, ©2010.
Edição/Formato   Livro : InglêsVer todas as edições e formatos
Base de Dados:WorldCat
Resumo:
The term "resurrection" has come to stand for what Christianity is all about. But a close look reveals that it should not be understood monolithically, but rather as a pluralistic and diverse phenomenon. Early Christian communities were convinced that Rome had not defeated Jesus when they crucified him. They employed a whole host of metaphors to express that conviction. The use of the single term "resurrection" to  Ler mais...
Classificação:

(ainda não classificado) 0 com críticas - Seja o primeiro.

Assuntos
Mais como este

 

Encontrar uma cópia na biblioteca

&AllPage.SpinnerRetrieving; Encontrando bibliotecas que possuem este item...

Detalhes

Gênero/Forma: Criticism, interpretation, etc
Pessoa Denominada: Jesus Christ; Jesus Christ.
Tipo de Documento: Livro
Todos os Autores / Contribuintes: Bernard Brandon Scott
ISBN: 9781598150209 1598150200
Número OCLC: 663459386
Descrição: xi, 251 p. ; 23 cm.
Conteúdos: Introduction: the problem with resurrection ----
1. The first reference ---
2. After death in ancient Israel ---
3. Awakening from the dead ---
4. The dead in the anointed will rise first ---
5. An experience of Jesus raised from the dead ---
6. The earliest resurrection narrative? ---
7. The list ---
8. He has been seen ---
9. With what kind of body? ---
10. Assumption ---
11. Empty tomb ---
12. Mathew and Lukeʹs take on Mark ---
13. The empty tomb, again ---
14. Mary Magdalene, first? ---
15. What happened? ----
Postscript: reclaiming resurrection.
Responsabilidade: Bernard Brandon Scott.

Resumo:

The term "resurrection" has come to stand for what Christianity is all about. But a close look reveals that it should not be understood monolithically, but rather as a pluralistic and diverse phenomenon. Early Christian communities were convinced that Rome had not defeated Jesus when they crucified him. They employed a whole host of metaphors to express that conviction. The use of the single term "resurrection" to cover the phenomenon is a mistake-one that has tyrannized Christianity. Furthermore, most Christians believe in a physical resurrection, although Paul clearly calls this into question. Once that tradition became fixed, it provided the lens through which everything else was viewed-and distorted. The purpose of this book is not to say whether Jesus arose from the grave on the third day, or whether such an event is impossible. Rather, by examining the so-called resurrection stories in chronological order, it aspires to prompt readers to consider questions such as: a- what does the New Testament really say about the resurrection; b- what is the influence of Judaism on Christian belief in the resurrection; c- how did the resurrection become the central belief in Christianity; d- why did early Christians choose to believe in the resurrection; and e- and why is resurrection not the right word.

Críticas

Críticas contribuídas por usuários
Recuperando críticas GoodReas...
Recuperando comentários DOGObooks

Etiquetas

Seja o primeiro.

Ítens Similares

Assuntos Relacionados:(6)

Listas de usuários com este item (2)

Confirmar esta solicitação

Você já pode ter solicitado este item. Por favor, selecione Ok se gostaria de proceder com esta solicitação de qualquer forma.

Dados Ligados


<http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/663459386>
library:oclcnum"663459386"
library:placeOfPublication
library:placeOfPublication
owl:sameAs<info:oclcnum/663459386>
rdf:typeschema:Book
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:copyrightYear"2010"
schema:creator
schema:datePublished"2010"
schema:description"The term "resurrection" has come to stand for what Christianity is all about. But a close look reveals that it should not be understood monolithically, but rather as a pluralistic and diverse phenomenon. Early Christian communities were convinced that Rome had not defeated Jesus when they crucified him. They employed a whole host of metaphors to express that conviction. The use of the single term "resurrection" to cover the phenomenon is a mistake-one that has tyrannized Christianity. Furthermore, most Christians believe in a physical resurrection, although Paul clearly calls this into question. Once that tradition became fixed, it provided the lens through which everything else was viewed-and distorted. The purpose of this book is not to say whether Jesus arose from the grave on the third day, or whether such an event is impossible. Rather, by examining the so-called resurrection stories in chronological order, it aspires to prompt readers to consider questions such as: a- what does the New Testament really say about the resurrection; b- what is the influence of Judaism on Christian belief in the resurrection; c- how did the resurrection become the central belief in Christianity; d- why did early Christians choose to believe in the resurrection; and e- and why is resurrection not the right word."@en
schema:exampleOfWork<http://worldcat.org/entity/work/id/629085748>
schema:genre"Criticism, interpretation, etc."@en
schema:inLanguage"en"
schema:name"The trouble with resurrection : from Paul to the Fourth Gospel"@en
schema:numberOfPages"251"
schema:publisher
schema:url
schema:workExample

Content-negotiable representations

Close Window

Por favor, conecte-se ao WorldCat 

Não tem uma conta? Você pode facilmente criar uma conta gratuita.