跳至内容
The trouble with resurrection : from Paul to the Fourth Gospel 線上預覽
關閉線上預覽
正在查...

The trouble with resurrection : from Paul to the Fourth Gospel

作者: Bernard Brandon Scott
出版商: Salem, Or. : Polebridge Press, ©2010.
版本/格式:   圖書 : 英語所有版本和格式的總覽
資料庫:WorldCat
提要:
The term "resurrection" has come to stand for what Christianity is all about. But a close look reveals that it should not be understood monolithically, but rather as a pluralistic and diverse phenomenon. Early Christian communities were convinced that Rome had not defeated Jesus when they crucified him. They employed a whole host of metaphors to express that conviction. The use of the single term "resurrection" to  再讀一些...
評定級別:

(尚未評分) 0 附有評論 - 成爲第一個。

主題
更多類似這樣的

 

在圖書館查詢

&AllPage.SpinnerRetrieving; 正在查詢有此資料的圖書館...

詳細書目

類型/形式: Criticism, interpretation, etc
提及的人: Jesus Christ; Jesus Christ.
文件類型: 圖書
所有的作者/貢獻者: Bernard Brandon Scott
ISBN: 9781598150209 1598150200
OCLC系統控制編碼: 663459386
描述: xi, 251 p. ; 23 cm.
内容: Introduction: the problem with resurrection ----
1. The first reference ---
2. After death in ancient Israel ---
3. Awakening from the dead ---
4. The dead in the anointed will rise first ---
5. An experience of Jesus raised from the dead ---
6. The earliest resurrection narrative? ---
7. The list ---
8. He has been seen ---
9. With what kind of body? ---
10. Assumption ---
11. Empty tomb ---
12. Mathew and Lukeʹs take on Mark ---
13. The empty tomb, again ---
14. Mary Magdalene, first? ---
15. What happened? ----
Postscript: reclaiming resurrection.
責任: Bernard Brandon Scott.

摘要:

The term "resurrection" has come to stand for what Christianity is all about. But a close look reveals that it should not be understood monolithically, but rather as a pluralistic and diverse phenomenon. Early Christian communities were convinced that Rome had not defeated Jesus when they crucified him. They employed a whole host of metaphors to express that conviction. The use of the single term "resurrection" to cover the phenomenon is a mistake-one that has tyrannized Christianity. Furthermore, most Christians believe in a physical resurrection, although Paul clearly calls this into question. Once that tradition became fixed, it provided the lens through which everything else was viewed-and distorted. The purpose of this book is not to say whether Jesus arose from the grave on the third day, or whether such an event is impossible. Rather, by examining the so-called resurrection stories in chronological order, it aspires to prompt readers to consider questions such as: a- what does the New Testament really say about the resurrection; b- what is the influence of Judaism on Christian belief in the resurrection; c- how did the resurrection become the central belief in Christianity; d- why did early Christians choose to believe in the resurrection; and e- and why is resurrection not the right word.

評論

讀者提供的評論
正在擷取GoodReads評論...
正在擷取DOGObooks的評論

標籤

成爲第一個

類似資料

相關主題:(6)

提供給讀者有關此資料的清單 (2)

確認申請

你可能已經申請過這份資料。若還是想申請,請選確認。

連結資料


<http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/663459386>
library:oclcnum"663459386"
library:placeOfPublication
library:placeOfPublication
owl:sameAs<info:oclcnum/663459386>
rdf:typeschema:Book
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:copyrightYear"2010"
schema:creator
schema:datePublished"2010"
schema:description"The term "resurrection" has come to stand for what Christianity is all about. But a close look reveals that it should not be understood monolithically, but rather as a pluralistic and diverse phenomenon. Early Christian communities were convinced that Rome had not defeated Jesus when they crucified him. They employed a whole host of metaphors to express that conviction. The use of the single term "resurrection" to cover the phenomenon is a mistake-one that has tyrannized Christianity. Furthermore, most Christians believe in a physical resurrection, although Paul clearly calls this into question. Once that tradition became fixed, it provided the lens through which everything else was viewed-and distorted. The purpose of this book is not to say whether Jesus arose from the grave on the third day, or whether such an event is impossible. Rather, by examining the so-called resurrection stories in chronological order, it aspires to prompt readers to consider questions such as: a- what does the New Testament really say about the resurrection; b- what is the influence of Judaism on Christian belief in the resurrection; c- how did the resurrection become the central belief in Christianity; d- why did early Christians choose to believe in the resurrection; and e- and why is resurrection not the right word."@en
schema:exampleOfWork<http://worldcat.org/entity/work/id/629085748>
schema:genre"Criticism, interpretation, etc."@en
schema:inLanguage"en"
schema:name"The trouble with resurrection : from Paul to the Fourth Gospel"@en
schema:numberOfPages"251"
schema:publisher
schema:url
schema:workExample

Content-negotiable representations

關閉視窗

請登入WorldCat 

没有帳號嗎?你可很容易的 建立免費的帳號.