skip to content
The United Nations is terminally paralyzed : debate Preview this item
ClosePreview this item
Checking...

The United Nations is terminally paralyzed : debate

Author: Films for the Humanities & Sciences (Firm); Films Media Group.; Intelligence2.
Publisher: New York, N.Y. : Films Media Group, [2009], ©2009.
Edition/Format:   eVideo : Clipart/images/graphics : EnglishView all editions and formats
Database:WorldCat
Summary:
As a peacekeeper, the UN has had dubious results. It did nothing for Darfur. Its 17,000 blue helmets have failed to stop the violence in North Kivu. And it never reached a resolution on whether to intervene in Myanmar. Is the United Nations terminally paralyzed-and does the democratic world need a new forum of its own? That is the two-part question in this Oxford Union-style debate as panelists make their case.  Read more...
Rating:

(not yet rated) 0 with reviews - Be the first.

Subjects
More like this

 

Find a copy online

Links to this item

Find a copy in the library

&AllPage.SpinnerRetrieving; Finding libraries that hold this item...

Details

Genre/Form: Educational films
Internet videos
Videorecording
Additional Physical Format: Originally produced:
Intelligence Squared, 2009
Material Type: Clipart/images/graphics, Internet resource, Videorecording
Document Type: Internet Resource, Computer File, Visual material
All Authors / Contributors: Films for the Humanities & Sciences (Firm); Films Media Group.; Intelligence2.
OCLC Number: 700414939
Notes: Encoded with permission for digital streaming by Films Media Group on Nov. 06, 2009.
Films on Demand is distributed by Films Media Group for Films for the Humanities & Sciences, Cambridge Educational, Meridian Education, and Shopware.
Description: 1 streaming video file (47 min.) : sd., col., digital file.
Details: Mode of access: Internet.; System requirements: FOD playback platform.
Contents: Introduction to Debate About United Nations (1:56) --
Radek Sikorski: Representation of International Governments (2:48) --
Shashi Tharoor: Benefits and Adaptability of Current UN Model (3:51) --
Robert Kagan: Globalized Democracy (3:06) --
Jeremy Greenstock: UN Members are Ineffective (3:41) --
Denis MacShane: Failure of UN (3:08) --
Lord Malloch-Brown: Individual Nations Inhibit the UN (3:28) --
Q&A:Is the United Nations Effective? (2:54) --
Q&A: Will a New U.S. President Strengthen the UN? (1:24) --
Q&A: Right to Disagree (2:10) --
Q&A: Strengthening the Existing UN (0:54) --
Q&A: Role of the UN (2:21) --
Q&A: Are You Afraid of the Community of Democracies (2:24) --
Q&A: Future of the UN (1:48) --
Q&A: Addressing Global Tensions (1:38) --
Summation: Lord Malloch-Brown and Denis Machshane (2:42) --
Summation: Sir Jeremy Greenstock and Robert Kagan (2:06) --
Summation: Shashi Tharoor and Radek Sikorski (1:59) --
Final Poll Results (1:35)
Other Titles: Debate
Responsibility: Intelligence Squared.

Abstract:

As a peacekeeper, the UN has had dubious results. It did nothing for Darfur. Its 17,000 blue helmets have failed to stop the violence in North Kivu. And it never reached a resolution on whether to intervene in Myanmar. Is the United Nations terminally paralyzed-and does the democratic world need a new forum of its own? That is the two-part question in this Oxford Union-style debate as panelists make their case. Speakers for the motion call attention to repeated deadlocks in the Security Council as an obstacle to resolutions on humanitarian crises and extol the potential benefits of a league of democracies; those against emphasize that the UN is the only universally acknowledged seat of collective legitimacy and justice and express concern over the potentially ostracizing and polarizing effects of a "club of democracies" in a world with cross-cultural problems. Questions from the floor follow. The final vote? Significantly against. BBC World News anchor Zeinab Badawi presides.

Reviews

User-contributed reviews
Retrieving GoodReads reviews...
Retrieving DOGObooks reviews...

Tags

Be the first.

Similar Items

Confirm this request

You may have already requested this item. Please select Ok if you would like to proceed with this request anyway.

Linked Data


Primary Entity

<http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/700414939> # The United Nations is terminally paralyzed debate
    a schema:CreativeWork, schema:VideoObject, schema:Movie ;
   library:oclcnum "700414939" ;
   library:placeOfPublication <http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/countries/nyu> ;
   library:placeOfPublication <http://experiment.worldcat.org/entity/work/data/693559735#Place/new_york_n_y> ; # New York, N.Y.
   rdfs:comment "Unknown 'gen' value: cig" ;
   schema:about <http://id.worldcat.org/fast/977053> ; # International relations
   schema:about <http://id.worldcat.org/fast/1069819> ; # Political science--Philosophy
   schema:about <http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh88004669> ; # Political science--Philosophy
   schema:alternateName "Debate" ;
   schema:contributor <http://viaf.org/viaf/135214153> ; # Films for the Humanities & Sciences (Firm)
   schema:contributor <http://viaf.org/viaf/149284014> ; # Films Media Group.
   schema:contributor <http://viaf.org/viaf/180954455> ; # Intelligence2.
   schema:datePublished "2009" ;
   schema:description "Introduction to Debate About United Nations (1:56) -- Radek Sikorski: Representation of International Governments (2:48) -- Shashi Tharoor: Benefits and Adaptability of Current UN Model (3:51) -- Robert Kagan: Globalized Democracy (3:06) -- Jeremy Greenstock: UN Members are Ineffective (3:41) -- Denis MacShane: Failure of UN (3:08) -- Lord Malloch-Brown: Individual Nations Inhibit the UN (3:28) -- Q&A:Is the United Nations Effective? (2:54) -- Q&A: Will a New U.S. President Strengthen the UN? (1:24) -- Q&A: Right to Disagree (2:10) -- Q&A: Strengthening the Existing UN (0:54) -- Q&A: Role of the UN (2:21) -- Q&A: Are You Afraid of the Community of Democracies (2:24) -- Q&A: Future of the UN (1:48) -- Q&A: Addressing Global Tensions (1:38) -- Summation: Lord Malloch-Brown and Denis Machshane (2:42) -- Summation: Sir Jeremy Greenstock and Robert Kagan (2:06) -- Summation: Shashi Tharoor and Radek Sikorski (1:59) -- Final Poll Results (1:35)" ;
   schema:description "As a peacekeeper, the UN has had dubious results. It did nothing for Darfur. Its 17,000 blue helmets have failed to stop the violence in North Kivu. And it never reached a resolution on whether to intervene in Myanmar. Is the United Nations terminally paralyzed-and does the democratic world need a new forum of its own? That is the two-part question in this Oxford Union-style debate as panelists make their case. Speakers for the motion call attention to repeated deadlocks in the Security Council as an obstacle to resolutions on humanitarian crises and extol the potential benefits of a league of democracies; those against emphasize that the UN is the only universally acknowledged seat of collective legitimacy and justice and express concern over the potentially ostracizing and polarizing effects of a "club of democracies" in a world with cross-cultural problems. Questions from the floor follow. The final vote? Significantly against. BBC World News anchor Zeinab Badawi presides." ;
   schema:exampleOfWork <http://worldcat.org/entity/work/id/693559735> ;
   schema:genre "Videorecording" ;
   schema:genre "Internet videos" ;
   schema:genre "Educational films" ;
   schema:inLanguage "en" ;
   schema:isSimilarTo <http://worldcat.org/entity/work/data/693559735#CreativeWork/> ;
   schema:name "The United Nations is terminally paralyzed debate" ;
   schema:productID "700414939" ;
   schema:publication <http://www.worldcat.org/title/-/oclc/700414939#PublicationEvent/new_york_n_y_films_media_group_2009_c2009> ;
   schema:publisher <http://experiment.worldcat.org/entity/work/data/693559735#Agent/films_media_group> ; # Films Media Group
   schema:url <https://ezproxy.uu.edu/login?url=http://digital.films.com/PortalPlaylists.aspx?aid=13753&xtid=40530> ;
   wdrs:describedby <http://www.worldcat.org/title/-/oclc/700414939> ;
    .


Related Entities

<http://experiment.worldcat.org/entity/work/data/693559735#Agent/films_media_group> # Films Media Group
    a bgn:Agent ;
   schema:name "Films Media Group" ;
    .

<http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh88004669> # Political science--Philosophy
    a schema:Intangible ;
   schema:name "Political science--Philosophy" ;
    .

<http://id.worldcat.org/fast/1069819> # Political science--Philosophy
    a schema:Intangible ;
   schema:name "Political science--Philosophy" ;
    .

<http://id.worldcat.org/fast/977053> # International relations
    a schema:Intangible ;
   schema:name "International relations" ;
    .

<http://viaf.org/viaf/135214153> # Films for the Humanities & Sciences (Firm)
    a schema:Organization ;
   schema:name "Films for the Humanities & Sciences (Firm)" ;
    .

<http://viaf.org/viaf/149284014> # Films Media Group.
    a schema:Organization ;
   schema:name "Films Media Group." ;
    .

<http://viaf.org/viaf/180954455> # Intelligence2.
    a schema:Organization ;
   schema:name "Intelligence2." ;
    .

<http://worldcat.org/entity/work/data/693559735#CreativeWork/>
    a schema:CreativeWork ;
   schema:description "Originally produced:" ;
   schema:isSimilarTo <http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/700414939> ; # The United Nations is terminally paralyzed debate
    .


Content-negotiable representations

Close Window

Please sign in to WorldCat 

Don't have an account? You can easily create a free account.