passa ai contenuti
Video resources on the Constitution 2009 Anteprima di questo documento
ChiudiAnteprima di questo documento
Stiamo controllando…

Video resources on the Constitution 2009

Autore: Anthony M KennedyStephen G BreyerSandra Day O'ConnorAntonin ScaliaJohn G RobertsTutti gli autori
Editore: [Philadelphia] : Annenberg Foundation Trust at Sunnylands, ©2009.
Serie: Sunnylands seminars.
Edizione/Formato:   Video DVD : EnglishVedi tutte le edizioni e i formati
Banca dati:WorldCat
Sommario:
"Disc 1. Freedom of speech: Amid the turmoil of the 1960s, students decided to wear black armbands to protest the Vietnam War, igniting a legal battle that led to a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision, Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District (1969), which defined students' right to free speech in school. This conversation focuses on free speech in light of Tinker and the Morse v. Frederick (2007)  Per saperne di più…
Voto:

(non ancora votato) 0 con commenti - Diventa il primo.

Soggetti
Altri come questo

 

Trova una copia in biblioteca

&AllPage.SpinnerRetrieving; Stiamo ricercando le biblioteche che possiedono questo documento…

Dettagli

Tipo materiale: Videorecording
Tipo documento: Materiale visivo
Tutti gli autori / Collaboratori: Anthony M Kennedy; Stephen G Breyer; Sandra Day O'Connor; Antonin Scalia; John G Roberts; Ruth Bader Ginsburg; Annenberg Foundation Trust at Sunnylands.
Numero OCLC: 432335869
Nota sulla lingua: Closed captioned.
Note: Title from container.
A project of The Annenberg Foundation Trust at Sunnylands.
Distribuzione: Stephen G. Breyer, Sandra Day O'Connor, Anthony M. Kennedy.
Descrizione: 2 videodiscs (98 min.) : sd., col. ; 4 3/4 in.
Dettagli: DVD.
Contenuti: Disc 1. Conversation on the Constitution with Justices Stephen G. Breyer, Sandra Day O'Connor, and Anthony M. Kennedy : freedom of speech - Conversation on the Constitution with Justices Stephen G. Breyer, Sandra Day O'Connor, and Anthony M. Kennedy : jury service - FAQs : juries. Disc 2. The Constitution project : Yick Wo and the Equal Protection clause - Constitution project : Korematsu and civil liberties.
Titolo della serie: Sunnylands seminars.
Altri titoli: Constitution project documentaries
Conversations on the Constitution
FAQs: juries

Abstract:

"Disc 1. Freedom of speech: Amid the turmoil of the 1960s, students decided to wear black armbands to protest the Vietnam War, igniting a legal battle that led to a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision, Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District (1969), which defined students' right to free speech in school. This conversation focuses on free speech in light of Tinker and the Morse v. Frederick (2007) case. Jury Service: This conversation explores the history and responsibilities of juries and the role they play in the United States judicial system. Juries: In 11 short video segments, constitutional experts, lawyers and judges discuss the importance of jury service, including the history of English and American juries, types of juries, qualifications for jury service and what to expect as a juror. Disc 2. Yick Wo and the Equal Protection clause: In Yick Wo v. Hopkins (1886), the U.S. Supreme Court held that non-citizens had due process rights under the 14th Amendment. the plaintiff, an immigrant from China who had run a laundry service for 22 years, filed suit after he was denied a permit to operate his business. The Supreme Court unanimously ruled that although the laundry permit law was race-neutral, it was applied in a discriminatory fashion. Korematsu and civil liberties: After America was attacked by Japan at Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941, President Franklin Delano Roosevelt issued Executive Order 9066 consigning 120,000 people of Japanese ancestry (two-thirds of them American citizens) to internment camps. Fred Korematsu challenged the internment all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court. In Korematsu v. United States (1944), the court sided with the government. Decades later, Congress and the U.S. president formally apologized for the internment" -- Container.

Commenti

Commenti degli utenti
Recuperando commenti GoodReads…
Stiamo recuperando commenti DOGObooks

Etichette

Diventa il primo.
Conferma questa richiesta

Potresti aver già richiesto questo documento. Seleziona OK se si vuole procedere comunque con questa richiesta.

Dati collegati


<http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/432335869>
library:oclcnum"432335869"
library:placeOfPublication
library:placeOfPublication
owl:sameAs<info:oclcnum/432335869>
rdf:typeschema:Movie
rdf:typej.2:DVD
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
<http://viaf.org/viaf/144945827>
rdf:typeschema:Organization
schema:name"United States. Supreme Court."
schema:name"United States. Supreme Court"
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:contributor
schema:contributor
schema:contributor
schema:contributor
schema:contributor
schema:contributor
schema:contributor
schema:copyrightYear"2009"
schema:datePublished"2009"
schema:description""Disc 1. Freedom of speech: Amid the turmoil of the 1960s, students decided to wear black armbands to protest the Vietnam War, igniting a legal battle that led to a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision, Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District (1969), which defined students' right to free speech in school. This conversation focuses on free speech in light of Tinker and the Morse v. Frederick (2007) case. Jury Service: This conversation explores the history and responsibilities of juries and the role they play in the United States judicial system. Juries: In 11 short video segments, constitutional experts, lawyers and judges discuss the importance of jury service, including the history of English and American juries, types of juries, qualifications for jury service and what to expect as a juror. Disc 2. Yick Wo and the Equal Protection clause: In Yick Wo v. Hopkins (1886), the U.S. Supreme Court held that non-citizens had due process rights under the 14th Amendment. the plaintiff, an immigrant from China who had run a laundry service for 22 years, filed suit after he was denied a permit to operate his business. The Supreme Court unanimously ruled that although the laundry permit law was race-neutral, it was applied in a discriminatory fashion. Korematsu and civil liberties: After America was attacked by Japan at Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941, President Franklin Delano Roosevelt issued Executive Order 9066 consigning 120,000 people of Japanese ancestry (two-thirds of them American citizens) to internment camps. Fred Korematsu challenged the internment all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court. In Korematsu v. United States (1944), the court sided with the government. Decades later, Congress and the U.S. president formally apologized for the internment" -- Container."
schema:description"Disc 1. Conversation on the Constitution with Justices Stephen G. Breyer, Sandra Day O'Connor, and Anthony M. Kennedy : freedom of speech - Conversation on the Constitution with Justices Stephen G. Breyer, Sandra Day O'Connor, and Anthony M. Kennedy : jury service - FAQs : juries. Disc 2. The Constitution project : Yick Wo and the Equal Protection clause - Constitution project : Korematsu and civil liberties."
schema:exampleOfWork<http://worldcat.org/entity/work/id/369977042>
schema:inLanguage"en"
schema:name"Conversations on the Constitution"
schema:name"FAQs: juries"
schema:name"Constitution project documentaries"
schema:name"Video resources on the Constitution 2009"
schema:publisher
schema:url

Content-negotiable representations

Chiudi finestra

Per favore entra in WorldCat 

Non hai un account? Puoi facilmente crearne uno gratuito.