skip to content
The votes that counted : how the court decided the 2000 presidential election Preview this item
ClosePreview this item
Checking...

The votes that counted : how the court decided the 2000 presidential election

Author: Howard Gillman
Publisher: Chicago : University of Chicago Press, ©2001.
Edition/Format:   Book : EnglishView all editions and formats
Database:WorldCat
Summary:
The dramatic struggle over the outcome of the 2000 presidential election presented judges with an extraordinary political challenge, as well as a historic political temptation. In The Votes That Counted Howard Gillman offers a comprehensive yet critical assessment of how well courts coped with the competing expectations for impartial justice and favorable partisan results. Lively and authoritative, the book  Read more...
Rating:

(not yet rated) 0 with reviews - Be the first.

Subjects
More like this

 

Find a copy in the library

&AllPage.SpinnerRetrieving; Finding libraries that hold this item...

Details

Genre/Form: History
Trials, litigation, etc
Named Person: Al Gore; George W Bush; Albert Gore, Politiker.; George W Bush
Material Type: Internet resource
Document Type: Book, Internet Resource
All Authors / Contributors: Howard Gillman
ISBN: 0226294072 9780226294070
OCLC Number: 47013116
Description: xxiv, 301 p. ; 24 cm.
Contents: Courts and the political challenge of Election 2000 --
Who won? The election goes to court --
Changing the rules? The Florida Supreme Court, Round One --
A shot across the bow: the U.S. Supreme Court enters the fray --
Gores' last chance: the Florida Supreme Court, Round Two --
The dam breaks: five justices pick a president --
Politics behind the votes that counted.
Responsibility: Howard Gillman.
More information:

Abstract:

The dramatic struggle over the outcome of the 200 presidential election presented judges with an extraordinary political challenge, as well as with a historic political temptation. This book offers a  Read more...

Reviews

User-contributed reviews
Retrieving GoodReads reviews...
Retrieving DOGObooks reviews...

Tags

Be the first.
Confirm this request

You may have already requested this item. Please select Ok if you would like to proceed with this request anyway.

Linked Data


<http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/47013116>
library:oclcnum"47013116"
library:placeOfPublication
library:placeOfPublication
owl:sameAs<info:oclcnum/47013116>
rdf:typeschema:Book
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
<http://experiment.worldcat.org/entity/work/data/666570#Topic/presidents_etats_unis_election_2000>
rdf:typeschema:Intangible
schema:name"Présidents--États-Unis--Élection (2000)."@en
schema:name"Présidents--États-Unis--Élection--2000."@fr
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
<http://viaf.org/viaf/71559485>
rdf:typeschema:Person
schema:birthDate"1946"
schema:familyName"Bush"
schema:givenName"George W."
schema:name"Bush, George W."
schema:name"Bush, George W. (George Walker), 1946-"
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:copyrightYear"2001"
schema:creator
schema:datePublished"2001"
schema:description"Courts and the political challenge of Election 2000 -- Who won? The election goes to court -- Changing the rules? The Florida Supreme Court, Round One -- A shot across the bow: the U.S. Supreme Court enters the fray -- Gores' last chance: the Florida Supreme Court, Round Two -- The dam breaks: five justices pick a president -- Politics behind the votes that counted."@en
schema:description"The dramatic struggle over the outcome of the 2000 presidential election presented judges with an extraordinary political challenge, as well as a historic political temptation. In The Votes That Counted Howard Gillman offers a comprehensive yet critical assessment of how well courts coped with the competing expectations for impartial justice and favorable partisan results. Lively and authoritative, the book documents how the participants, the press, the academic community, and the public responded during these tension-filled thirty-six days. Gillman also provides a serious yet accessible overview of the legal strategies and debates-from briefs and oral arguments to final decisions. However, in explaining the behavior of courts, he moves beyond an analysis of law to also take into account the influences of partisanship, judicial ideology, and broader political and historical contexts. Appropriately, Gillman pays special attention to the judges whose behavior generated the most controversy--the battling justices of the Florida and United States Supreme Courts. After carefully reviewing the arguments for and against their decisions, he concludes that the five justices behind the Bush v. Gore decision acted outside what should be considered the acceptable boundaries of judicial power. Gillman ends with an analysis of why they chose such an unprecedented course of action and an assessment of whether their partisan intervention will have any lasting effect on the Supreme Court's reputation and authority. ... Publisher description."@en
schema:exampleOfWork<http://worldcat.org/entity/work/id/666570>
schema:genre"History."@en
schema:genre"History"@en
schema:inLanguage"en"
schema:name"The votes that counted : how the court decided the 2000 presidential election"@en
schema:numberOfPages"301"
schema:publisher
schema:url
schema:workExample

Content-negotiable representations

Close Window

Please sign in to WorldCat 

Don't have an account? You can easily create a free account.