Find a copy in the library
Finding libraries that hold this item...
Details
| Additional Physical Format: | Online version: Fischer, Joseph R., 1953- Well-executed failure. Columbia, South Carolina : University of South Carolina Press, c1997 (OCoLC)605710607 |
|---|---|
| Named Person: | John Sullivan; John Sullivan, Soldat. |
| Material Type: | Government publication, State or province government publication |
| Document Type: | Book |
| All Authors / Contributors: |
Joseph R Fischer |
| ISBN: | 1570031371 9781570031373 |
| OCLC Number: | 34832704 |
| Description: | x, 265 p. : ill., maps ; 24 cm. |
| Contents: | Introduction -- The frontier in flames : 1778 -- Strategy and operations -- Tactics -- Logistics -- Leadership -- Civil-military relations -- Conclusions. |
| Responsibility: | Joseph R. Fischer. |
Abstract:
Fischer suggests that the historical focus on the campaign's failure has overshadowed its importance as a vehicle for understanding the Continental army at a turning point in the war. He demonstrates that this representative slice of the Continental army provides exceptional insight into the growing professionalism of George Washington's military.
Reviews
WorldCat User Reviews (1)
Diplomatic or Military Failure? That is the Question
Dr. Fischer is perhaps brilliant at tongue-in-cheek humor. At first blush while considering the title of this book, one might conclude General Sullivan as being the failure. Initially, this was an irritation because of the involvement of my ancestor in the Sullivan campaign. Giving...
Read more...
Dr. Fischer is perhaps brilliant at tongue-in-cheek humor. At first blush while considering the title of this book, one might conclude General Sullivan as being the failure. Initially, this was an irritation because of the involvement of my ancestor in the Sullivan campaign. Giving away the "ending," Dr. Fischer commends Sullivan for a "tactical military victory." The author pins the "failure" to achieve a strategic military victory on General George Washington. Implied is the suggestion that a strategic military victory would have meant genocide for the tribes of the Iroquois Confederation which sided with the British. How else could a strategic military victory been achieved. There was, however, a diplomatic victory as the British, in the final treaty hammered out, chose to protect its American Indian allies. It was an offer of protection in Canada which those tribes could not refuse. The tongue-in-cheek part, perhaps, allows this author, a military man, the ability to gracefully avoid endorsing a wrongful military solution without also endorsing the diplomatic solution. Lesson learned: never judge a book by its cover.
- Was this review helpful to you?
Tags
All user tags (8)
- america (by 1 person)
- american colonists (by 1 person)
- american revolution (by 1 person)
- general george washington (by 1 person)
- general sullivan (by 1 person)
- great britain (by 1 person)
- iroquois confederation (by 1 person)
- new york (upstate) (by 1 person)
- 1 items are tagged withamerica
- 1 items are tagged withamerican colonists
- 1 items are tagged withamerican revolution
- 1 items are tagged withgeneral george washington
- 1 items are tagged withgeneral sullivan
- 1 items are tagged withgreat britain
- 1 items are tagged withiroquois confederation
- 1 items are tagged withnew york (upstate)


