přejít na obsah
Why tie a product consumers do not use? Náhled dokumentu
ZavřítNáhled dokumentu
Probíhá kontrola...

Why tie a product consumers do not use?

Autor Dennis W Carlton; Joshua Gans; Michael Waldman; National Bureau of Economic Research.
Vydavatel: Cambridge, Mass. : National Bureau of Economic Research, 2007.
Edice: Working paper series (National Bureau of Economic Research), no. 13339.
Vydání/formát:   e-kniha : Document : EnglishZobrazit všechny vydání a formáty
Databáze:WorldCat
Shrnutí:
This paper provides a new explanation for tying that is not based on any of the standard explanations -- efficiency, price discrimination, and exclusion. Our analysis shows how a monopolist sometimes has an incentive to tie a complementary good to its monopolized good in order to transfer profits from a rival producer of the complementary product to the monopolist. This occurs even when consumers -- who have the  Přečíst více...
Hodnocení:

(ještě nehodnoceno) 0 zobrazit recenze - Buďte první.

Předmětová hesla:
Více podobných

 

Najít online exemplář

Odkazy na tento dokument

Vyhledat exemplář v knihovně

&AllPage.SpinnerRetrieving; Vyhledávání knihoven, které vlastní tento dokument...

Detaily

Typ materiálu: Document, Internetový zdroj
Typ dokumentu: Internet Resource, Computer File
Všichni autoři/tvůrci: Dennis W Carlton; Joshua Gans; Michael Waldman; National Bureau of Economic Research.
OCLC číslo: 166326460
Popis: 1 online resource (1 v.)
Název edice: Working paper series (National Bureau of Economic Research), no. 13339.
Odpovědnost: Dennis W. Carlton, Joshua S. Gans, Michael Waldman.

Anotace:

This paper provides a new explanation for tying that is not based on any of the standard explanations -- efficiency, price discrimination, and exclusion. Our analysis shows how a monopolist sometimes has an incentive to tie a complementary good to its monopolized good in order to transfer profits from a rival producer of the complementary product to the monopolist. This occurs even when consumers -- who have the option to use the monopolist's complementary good -- do not use it. The tie is profitable because it alters the subsequent pricing game between the monopolist and the rival in a manner favorable to the monopolist. We show that this form of tying is socially inefficient, but interestingly can arise only when the tie is socially efficient in the absence of the rival producer. We relate this inefficient form of tying to several actual examples and explore its antitrust implications.

Recenze

Recenze vložené uživatelem
Nahrávání recenzí GoodReads...
Přebírání recenzí DOGO books...

Štítky

Buďte první.

Podobné dokumenty

Potvrdit tento požadavek

Tento dokument jste si již vyžádali. Prosím vyberte Ok pokud chcete přesto v žádance pokračovat.

Propojená data


<http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/166326460>
library:oclcnum"166326460"
library:placeOfPublication
library:placeOfPublication
owl:sameAs<info:oclcnum/166326460>
rdf:typeschema:Book
schema:about
<http://id.worldcat.org/fast/1010232>
rdf:typeschema:Intangible
schema:name"Marketing--Mathematical models"@en
schema:name"Marketing--Mathematical models."@en
schema:about
<http://id.worldcat.org/fast/876336>
rdf:typeschema:Intangible
schema:name"Consumer goods--Mathematical models"@en
schema:name"Consumer goods--Mathematical models."@en
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:bookFormatschema:EBook
schema:contributor
schema:contributor
schema:contributor
schema:creator
schema:datePublished"2007"
schema:description"This paper provides a new explanation for tying that is not based on any of the standard explanations -- efficiency, price discrimination, and exclusion. Our analysis shows how a monopolist sometimes has an incentive to tie a complementary good to its monopolized good in order to transfer profits from a rival producer of the complementary product to the monopolist. This occurs even when consumers -- who have the option to use the monopolist's complementary good -- do not use it. The tie is profitable because it alters the subsequent pricing game between the monopolist and the rival in a manner favorable to the monopolist. We show that this form of tying is socially inefficient, but interestingly can arise only when the tie is socially efficient in the absence of the rival producer. We relate this inefficient form of tying to several actual examples and explore its antitrust implications."@en
schema:exampleOfWork<http://worldcat.org/entity/work/id/112857576>
schema:inLanguage"en"
schema:name"Why tie a product consumers do not use?"@en
schema:publisher
schema:url<http://papers.nber.org/papers/w13339>
schema:url

Content-negotiable representations

Zavřít okno

Prosím přihlaste se do WorldCat 

Nemáte účet? Můžete si jednoduše vytvořit bezplatný účet.