omitir hasta el contenido
Why tie a product consumers do not use? Ver este material de antemano
CerrarVer este material de antemano
Chequeando…

Why tie a product consumers do not use?

Autor: Dennis W Carlton; Joshua Gans; Michael Waldman; National Bureau of Economic Research.
Editorial: Cambridge, Mass. : National Bureau of Economic Research, 2007.
Serie: Working paper series (National Bureau of Economic Research), no. 13339.
Edición/Formato:   Libro-e : Documento : Inglés (eng)Ver todas las ediciones y todos los formatos
Base de datos:WorldCat
Resumen:
This paper provides a new explanation for tying that is not based on any of the standard explanations -- efficiency, price discrimination, and exclusion. Our analysis shows how a monopolist sometimes has an incentive to tie a complementary good to its monopolized good in order to transfer profits from a rival producer of the complementary product to the monopolist. This occurs even when consumers -- who have the  Leer más
Calificación:

(todavía no calificado) 0 con reseñas - Ser el primero.

Temas
Más materiales como éste

 

Encontrar un ejemplar en línea

Enlaces a este material

Encontrar un ejemplar en la biblioteca

&AllPage.SpinnerRetrieving; Encontrando bibliotecas que tienen este material…

Detalles

Tipo de material: Documento, Recurso en Internet
Tipo de documento: Recurso en Internet, Archivo de computadora
Todos autores / colaboradores: Dennis W Carlton; Joshua Gans; Michael Waldman; National Bureau of Economic Research.
Número OCLC: 166326460
Descripción: 1 online resource (1 v.)
Título de la serie: Working paper series (National Bureau of Economic Research), no. 13339.
Responsabilidad: Dennis W. Carlton, Joshua S. Gans, Michael Waldman.

Resumen:

This paper provides a new explanation for tying that is not based on any of the standard explanations -- efficiency, price discrimination, and exclusion. Our analysis shows how a monopolist sometimes has an incentive to tie a complementary good to its monopolized good in order to transfer profits from a rival producer of the complementary product to the monopolist. This occurs even when consumers -- who have the option to use the monopolist's complementary good -- do not use it. The tie is profitable because it alters the subsequent pricing game between the monopolist and the rival in a manner favorable to the monopolist. We show that this form of tying is socially inefficient, but interestingly can arise only when the tie is socially efficient in the absence of the rival producer. We relate this inefficient form of tying to several actual examples and explore its antitrust implications.

Reseñas

Reseñas contribuidas por usuarios
Recuperando reseñas de GoodReads…
Recuperando reseñas de DOGObooks…

Etiquetas

Ser el primero.
Confirmar este pedido

Ya ha pedido este material. Escoja OK si desea procesar el pedido de todos modos.

Datos enlazados


<http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/166326460>
library:oclcnum"166326460"
library:placeOfPublication
library:placeOfPublication
owl:sameAs<info:oclcnum/166326460>
rdf:typeschema:Book
schema:about
<http://id.worldcat.org/fast/1010232>
rdf:typeschema:Intangible
schema:name"Marketing--Mathematical models"@en
schema:name"Marketing--Mathematical models."@en
schema:about
<http://id.worldcat.org/fast/876336>
rdf:typeschema:Intangible
schema:name"Consumer goods--Mathematical models"@en
schema:name"Consumer goods--Mathematical models."@en
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:bookFormatschema:EBook
schema:contributor
schema:contributor
schema:contributor
schema:creator
schema:datePublished"2007"
schema:description"This paper provides a new explanation for tying that is not based on any of the standard explanations -- efficiency, price discrimination, and exclusion. Our analysis shows how a monopolist sometimes has an incentive to tie a complementary good to its monopolized good in order to transfer profits from a rival producer of the complementary product to the monopolist. This occurs even when consumers -- who have the option to use the monopolist's complementary good -- do not use it. The tie is profitable because it alters the subsequent pricing game between the monopolist and the rival in a manner favorable to the monopolist. We show that this form of tying is socially inefficient, but interestingly can arise only when the tie is socially efficient in the absence of the rival producer. We relate this inefficient form of tying to several actual examples and explore its antitrust implications."@en
schema:exampleOfWork<http://worldcat.org/entity/work/id/112857576>
schema:inLanguage"en"
schema:name"Why tie a product consumers do not use?"@en
schema:publisher
schema:url<http://papers.nber.org/papers/w13339>
schema:url

Content-negotiable representations

Cerrar ventana

Inicie una sesión con WorldCat 

¿No tienes una cuenta? Puede fácilmente crear una cuenta gratuita.