aller au contenu
Why tie a product consumers do not use? Aperçu de cet ouvrage
FermerAperçu de cet ouvrage
Vérifiant…

Why tie a product consumers do not use?

Auteur : Dennis W Carlton; Joshua Gans; Michael Waldman; National Bureau of Economic Research.
Éditeur : Cambridge, Mass. : National Bureau of Economic Research, 2007.
Collection : Working paper series (National Bureau of Economic Research), no. 13339.
Édition/format :   Livre électronique : Document : AnglaisVoir toutes les éditions et les formats
Base de données :WorldCat
Résumé :
This paper provides a new explanation for tying that is not based on any of the standard explanations -- efficiency, price discrimination, and exclusion. Our analysis shows how a monopolist sometimes has an incentive to tie a complementary good to its monopolized good in order to transfer profits from a rival producer of the complementary product to the monopolist. This occurs even when consumers -- who have the  Lire la suite...
Évaluation :

(pas encore évalué) 0 avec des critiques - Soyez le premier.

Sujets
Plus comme ceci

 

Trouver un exemplaire en ligne

Liens vers cet ouvrage

Trouver un exemplaire dans la bibliothèque

&AllPage.SpinnerRetrieving; Recherche de bibliothèques qui possèdent cet ouvrage...

Détails

Type d’ouvrage : Document, Ressource Internet
Format : Ressource Internet, Fichier informatique
Tous les auteurs / collaborateurs : Dennis W Carlton; Joshua Gans; Michael Waldman; National Bureau of Economic Research.
Numéro OCLC : 166326460
Description : 1 online resource (1 v.)
Titre de collection : Working paper series (National Bureau of Economic Research), no. 13339.
Responsabilité : Dennis W. Carlton, Joshua S. Gans, Michael Waldman.

Résumé :

This paper provides a new explanation for tying that is not based on any of the standard explanations -- efficiency, price discrimination, and exclusion. Our analysis shows how a monopolist sometimes has an incentive to tie a complementary good to its monopolized good in order to transfer profits from a rival producer of the complementary product to the monopolist. This occurs even when consumers -- who have the option to use the monopolist's complementary good -- do not use it. The tie is profitable because it alters the subsequent pricing game between the monopolist and the rival in a manner favorable to the monopolist. We show that this form of tying is socially inefficient, but interestingly can arise only when the tie is socially efficient in the absence of the rival producer. We relate this inefficient form of tying to several actual examples and explore its antitrust implications.

Critiques

Critiques d’utilisateurs
Récupération des critiques de GoodReads...
Récuperation des critiques DOGObooks…

Tags

Soyez le premier.
Confirmez cette demande

Vous avez peut-être déjà demandé cet ouvrage. Veuillez sélectionner OK si vous voulez poursuivre avec cette demande quand même.

Données liées


<http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/166326460>
library:oclcnum"166326460"
library:placeOfPublication
library:placeOfPublication
owl:sameAs<info:oclcnum/166326460>
rdf:typeschema:Book
schema:about
<http://id.worldcat.org/fast/1010232>
rdf:typeschema:Intangible
schema:name"Marketing--Mathematical models"@en
schema:name"Marketing--Mathematical models."@en
schema:about
<http://id.worldcat.org/fast/876336>
rdf:typeschema:Intangible
schema:name"Consumer goods--Mathematical models"@en
schema:name"Consumer goods--Mathematical models."@en
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:bookFormatschema:EBook
schema:contributor
schema:contributor
schema:contributor
schema:creator
schema:datePublished"2007"
schema:description"This paper provides a new explanation for tying that is not based on any of the standard explanations -- efficiency, price discrimination, and exclusion. Our analysis shows how a monopolist sometimes has an incentive to tie a complementary good to its monopolized good in order to transfer profits from a rival producer of the complementary product to the monopolist. This occurs even when consumers -- who have the option to use the monopolist's complementary good -- do not use it. The tie is profitable because it alters the subsequent pricing game between the monopolist and the rival in a manner favorable to the monopolist. We show that this form of tying is socially inefficient, but interestingly can arise only when the tie is socially efficient in the absence of the rival producer. We relate this inefficient form of tying to several actual examples and explore its antitrust implications."@en
schema:exampleOfWork<http://worldcat.org/entity/work/id/112857576>
schema:inLanguage"en"
schema:name"Why tie a product consumers do not use?"@en
schema:publisher
schema:url<http://papers.nber.org/papers/w13339>
schema:url

Content-negotiable representations

Fermer la fenêtre

Veuillez vous identifier dans WorldCat 

Vous n’avez pas de compte? Vous pouvez facilement créer un compte gratuit.