passa ai contenuti
Why tie a product consumers do not use? Anteprima di questo documento
ChiudiAnteprima di questo documento
Stiamo controllando…

Why tie a product consumers do not use?

Autore: Dennis W Carlton; Joshua Gans; Michael Waldman; National Bureau of Economic Research.
Editore: Cambridge, Mass. : National Bureau of Economic Research, 2007.
Serie: Working paper series (National Bureau of Economic Research), no. 13339.
Edizione/Formato:   eBook : Document : EnglishVedi tutte le edizioni e i formati
Banca dati:WorldCat
Sommario:
This paper provides a new explanation for tying that is not based on any of the standard explanations -- efficiency, price discrimination, and exclusion. Our analysis shows how a monopolist sometimes has an incentive to tie a complementary good to its monopolized good in order to transfer profits from a rival producer of the complementary product to the monopolist. This occurs even when consumers -- who have the  Per saperne di più…
Voto:

(non ancora votato) 0 con commenti - Diventa il primo.

Soggetti
Altri come questo

 

Trova una copia online

Collegamenti a questo documento

Trova una copia in biblioteca

&AllPage.SpinnerRetrieving; Stiamo ricercando le biblioteche che possiedono questo documento…

Dettagli

Tipo materiale: Document, Risorsa internet
Tipo documento: Internet Resource, Computer File
Tutti gli autori / Collaboratori: Dennis W Carlton; Joshua Gans; Michael Waldman; National Bureau of Economic Research.
Numero OCLC: 166326460
Descrizione: 1 online resource (1 v.)
Titolo della serie: Working paper series (National Bureau of Economic Research), no. 13339.
Responsabilità: Dennis W. Carlton, Joshua S. Gans, Michael Waldman.

Abstract:

This paper provides a new explanation for tying that is not based on any of the standard explanations -- efficiency, price discrimination, and exclusion. Our analysis shows how a monopolist sometimes has an incentive to tie a complementary good to its monopolized good in order to transfer profits from a rival producer of the complementary product to the monopolist. This occurs even when consumers -- who have the option to use the monopolist's complementary good -- do not use it. The tie is profitable because it alters the subsequent pricing game between the monopolist and the rival in a manner favorable to the monopolist. We show that this form of tying is socially inefficient, but interestingly can arise only when the tie is socially efficient in the absence of the rival producer. We relate this inefficient form of tying to several actual examples and explore its antitrust implications.

Commenti

Commenti degli utenti
Recuperando commenti GoodReads…
Stiamo recuperando commenti DOGObooks

Etichette

Diventa il primo.
Conferma questa richiesta

Potresti aver già richiesto questo documento. Seleziona OK se si vuole procedere comunque con questa richiesta.

Dati collegati


<http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/166326460>
library:oclcnum"166326460"
library:placeOfPublication
library:placeOfPublication
owl:sameAs<info:oclcnum/166326460>
rdf:typeschema:Book
schema:about
<http://id.worldcat.org/fast/1010232>
rdf:typeschema:Intangible
schema:name"Marketing--Mathematical models"@en
schema:name"Marketing--Mathematical models."@en
schema:about
<http://id.worldcat.org/fast/876336>
rdf:typeschema:Intangible
schema:name"Consumer goods--Mathematical models"@en
schema:name"Consumer goods--Mathematical models."@en
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:about
schema:bookFormatschema:EBook
schema:contributor
schema:contributor
schema:contributor
schema:creator
schema:datePublished"2007"
schema:description"This paper provides a new explanation for tying that is not based on any of the standard explanations -- efficiency, price discrimination, and exclusion. Our analysis shows how a monopolist sometimes has an incentive to tie a complementary good to its monopolized good in order to transfer profits from a rival producer of the complementary product to the monopolist. This occurs even when consumers -- who have the option to use the monopolist's complementary good -- do not use it. The tie is profitable because it alters the subsequent pricing game between the monopolist and the rival in a manner favorable to the monopolist. We show that this form of tying is socially inefficient, but interestingly can arise only when the tie is socially efficient in the absence of the rival producer. We relate this inefficient form of tying to several actual examples and explore its antitrust implications."@en
schema:exampleOfWork<http://worldcat.org/entity/work/id/112857576>
schema:inLanguage"en"
schema:name"Why tie a product consumers do not use?"@en
schema:publisher
schema:url<http://papers.nber.org/papers/w13339>
schema:url

Content-negotiable representations

Chiudi finestra

Per favore entra in WorldCat 

Non hai un account? Puoi facilmente crearne uno gratuito.