• 引证/输出
  引证/输出

  复制引证文献

  APA（第6版）

  

  芝加哥（著者-日期，第15版）

  

  Harvard（第18版）

  

  MLA（第7版）

  

  Turabian（第6版）

  

  输出引证文献

  输出到RefWorks   输出到EndNote / 参考管理（Reference Manager）   输出到EasyBib   删除

  请注意： 这些引证文献都以参考咨询的标準為基础。但是，处理格式的规则，在应用程序、感兴趣或研究的领域之间会大相径庭。应当考虑到负责復审的出版商、上课的教师、机构或者组织的具体要求或者优先选择。
• 打印
• 电子邮件
  电子邮件

  所有的字段都要。

  电邮地址字段是一定要有的。请输入收件人的电子邮件地址。

  输入的电邮地址格式不对。请重新输入收件人的电邮地址。

  最多可将资料送给五个收件人。

  输入收件人的电子邮件地址： 最多能用逗号（,）将五个地址分开

  名字的字段是一定要有的。请输入您的名字。

  输入你的名字： 主题的字段是一定要有的。请输入主题。 主题:

  电子邮件讯息的字段是一定要有的。请输入讯息。

  电子邮件： 我想你可能会对这资料感兴趣，资料位于 http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/485075350 题名： Winter Microclimate of Bald Eagle Roosts on the Northern Chesapeake Bay 出版商： ISBN/ISSN: 0004-8038 OCLC:485075350

  
  

  输入的ReCaptcha词条不对。要设法和显示在窗口中的那两个字一样，也可试用音频版。

  删除
• 共享
• 永久链接
  永久链接

  复制URL以便和网页链接：

• 撰写评论
• 评估这资料：
• • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Winter Microclimate of Bald Eagle Roosts on the Northern Chesapeake Bay

著者：	David A Buehler; Timothy J Mersmann; James D Fraser; Janis K D Seegar
版本/格式：	文章 : 英语
刊登在：	The Auk, Jul., 1991, vol. 108, no. 3, p. 612-618
数据库：	JSTOR
提要：	From 11 November 1988 to 1 April 1989, we studied the microclimate and nightly energy budgets at three separate Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) communal roost sites; one used in winter, one used in summer, and another used year-round. We compared the roost sites with the microclimate and nightly energy budgets at randomly selected inland forested sites and eagle shoreline perch sites on the northern Chesapeake Bay. Mean and minimum air temperatures were similar among all sites. Mean and maximum wind speeds were greater at the shore than at other sites. Wind speed did not differ between roosts and inland sites. Among roost sites, mean and maximum wind speeds were lowest at the winter roost. The year-round roost and summer-roost winds did not differ. Mean net radiation was greater at inland sites than at the shore sites, whereas mean net radiation of roost and inland and of roost and shore sites did not differ. Minimum net radiation was greatest at inland sites, whereas roost and shore minimum net radiation did not differ. We calculated that roosting eagles would have expended 205.9 kcal per night at traditional roost sites, 206.6 kcal per night at shoreline perches, and 203.7 kcal per night at inland sites. Calculated energy expended on the 10 coldest nights was similar among roost, shoreline, and inland sites. Adding the estimated cost of transport from shoreline perches to roosts (x̄ = 5.3 kcal/round trip) did not produce significant differences in nightly energy expenditure between eagles roosting in communal roosts vs. those roosting on the shore.  再读一些...
评估：	(尚未评估) 0 附有评论 - 争取成为第一个。
在出版物中使用下列的字词搜索其他文章：