跳到内容
Yellowstone Grizzly Bear Mortality, Human Habituation, and Whitebark Pine Seed Crops
关闭预览资料

Yellowstone Grizzly Bear Mortality, Human Habituation, and Whitebark Pine Seed Crops

著者: David J Mattson; Bonnie M Blanchard; Richard R Knight
版本/格式: 文章 文章 : 英语
刊登在:The Journal of Wildlife Management, Jul., 1992, vol. 56, no. 3, p. 432-442
数据库:JSTOR
提要:
 再读一些...
评估:

(尚未评估) 0 附有评论 - 争取成为第一个。

 

在线查找

与期刊/刊物的链接

在图书馆查找

正在检索... 正在查找有这资料的图书馆...

详细书目

文件类型: 文章
所有的著者/提供者: David J Mattson; Bonnie M Blanchard; Richard R Knight
ISSN:0022-541X
OCLC号码: 480055676
语言注释: English
奖励:

摘要:

The Yellowstone grizzly bear (Ursus arctos horribilis) population may be extirpated during the next 100-200 years unless mortality rates stabilize and remain at acceptable low levels. Consequently, we analyzed relationships between Yellowstone grizzly bear mortality and frequency of human habituation among bears and size of the whitebark pine (Pinus albicaulis) seed crop. During years of large seed crops, bears used areas within 5 km of roads and 8 km of developments half as intensively as during years of small seed crops because whitebark pine's high elevation distribution is typically remote from human facilities. On average, management trappings of bears were 6.2 times higher, mortality of adult females 2.3 times higher, and mortality of subadult males 3.3 times higher during years of small seed crops. We hypothesize that high mortality of adult females and subadult males during small seed crop years was a consequence of their tendency to range closest (of all sex-age cohorts) to human facilities; they also had a higher frequency of human habituation compared with adult males. We also hypothesize that low mortality among subadult females during small seed crop years was a result of fewer energetic stressors compared with adult females and greater familiarity with their range compared with subadult males; mortality was low even though they ranged close to humans and exhibited a high frequency of human habituation. Human-habituated and food-conditioned bears were 2.9 times as likely to range within 4 km of developments and 3.1 times as often killed by humans compared with nonhabituated bears. We argue that destruction of habituated bears that use native foods near humans results in a decline in the overall ability of bears to use available habitat; and that the number and extent of human facilities in occupied grizzly bear habitat needs to be minimized unless habituated bears are preserved and successful ways to manage the associated risks to humans are developed.

评论

用户提供的评论
正在检索weRead中的评论...
正在获取GoodReads评论...
正在检索Amazon中的评论...

标签

争取是第一个!
确认申请

您可能已经申请过这份资料。如果还是想申请,请选确认。

关闭窗口

请登入WorldCat 

没有张号吗?很容易就可以 建立免费的账号.