skip to content
Close Window

Please sign in to WorldCat 

Don't have an account? You can easily create a free account.

Prisoners' rights : the Supreme Court and evolving standards of decency
Preview this item

Prisoners' rights : the Supreme Court and evolving standards of decency

Author: John A Fliter
Publisher: Westport, Conn. : Greenwood Press, 2001.
Series: Contributions in legal studies, no. 96
Edition/Format: Book : English
Summary:

Combining an historical and strategic analysis, this study describes the doctrinal development of the constitutional rights of prisoners from the pre-Warren Court period through the current Rehnquist Court. Like many provisions in the Bill of Rights, the meaning of the Eighth Amendment's language on "cruel and unusual punishment" and the scope of prisoners' rights have been influenced by prevailing public opinion, in Read more...

Rating:

Retrieving ratings and reviews data...  

Get this item

Borrow or obtain a copy

Finding libraries that hold this item...

Details

Document Type: Book
All Authors / Contributors: John A Fliter
ISBN: 0313314756 9780313314759
OCLC Number: 43694424
Description: xxiii, 213 p. ; 25 cm.
Contents: Federal courts, politics, and prisoners' rights -- Law, politics, and strategy in Supreme Court decision making -- Early court decisions and prisoners' rights -- The Warren Court and prisoners' rights, 1953-1969 -- The Burger court and prisoners' rights, 1969-1986 -- The Rehnquist court and prisoners' rights, 1986-present -- Prisoners' rights, the Supreme Court, and evolving standards of decency.
Series Title: Contributions in legal studies, no. 96
Responsibility: John A. Fliter.

Abstract:

Combining an historical and strategic analysis, this study describes the doctrinal development of the constitutional rights of prisoners from the pre-Warren Court period through the current Rehnquist Court. Like many provisions in the Bill of Rights, the meaning of the Eighth Amendment's language on "cruel and unusual punishment" and the scope of prisoners' rights have been influenced by prevailing public opinion, interest group advocacy, and the ideological values of the nine individuals who sit on the Supreme Court. These variables are incorporated in a strategic analysis of judicial decision making in an attempt to understand the constitutional development of rights in this area.

Reviews

Retrieving WorldCat reviews...
Retrieving EMRO reviews...
Retrieving weRead reviews...
Retrieving Amazon reviews...

Tags

Be the first.