Find a copy online
Links to this item
aei.org Full Report Online (If link is broken, contact publisher to inquire about access to full text)
Find a copy in the library
Finding libraries that hold this item...
Details
Material Type: | Document, Internet resource |
---|---|
Document Type: | Internet Resource, Computer File |
All Authors / Contributors: |
David A Hyman; William M Sage; American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research. |
OCLC Number: | 759098911 |
Notes: | Title from title caption (viewed on Oct. 13, 2011). "April 1, 2011." |
Description: | 26 unnumbered pages : digital, PDF file. |
Details: | System requirements: Adobe Acrobat Reader.; Mode of access: World Wide Web. |
Series Title: | AEI Health policy working paper, no. 2010-02. |
Responsibility: | David A. Hyman, William M. Sage. |
Abstract:
A frequent claim among critics of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) is that they would have been more likely to support "real health care reform" if it included malpractice reform. Indeed, many Republicans argued that health care spending and defensive medicine could be controlled only if the PPACA included comprehensive malpractice reform. House minority leader John Boehner (R-Ohio) offered a health reform bill in the fall of 2009 that included a series of conventional restrictions on lawsuits, including a one-year statute of limitations on medical malpractice claims involving adult patients (with a longer and more complicated period for claims involving children), a $250,000 cap on noneconomic damages recoverable from all sources for the same injury, and a sliding-scale limit on lawyers' contingent fees, with a maximum of 15 percent of any amount recovered in excess of $600,000.
Reviews
User-contributed reviews
Add a review and share your thoughts with other readers.
Be the first.
Add a review and share your thoughts with other readers.
Be the first.


Tags
Add tags for "Do health reform and malpractice reform fit together?".
Be the first.