Find a copy in the library
Finding libraries that hold this item...
Details
Genre/Form: | Thèses et écrits académiques |
---|---|
Additional Physical Format: | Liban, Syrie, Israël, 1991-2000 : les négociations illusoires / Amal Nader Paris : l'Harmattan, 2017 1 vol. (270 p.). (@Comprendre le Moyen-Orient) 978-2-343-13053-8 (ABES)223322350 |
Material Type: | Document, Thesis/dissertation |
Document Type: | Computer File |
All Authors / Contributors: |
Amal Nader; Michael Beaussenat Palmer; Guy Lochard; Gloria Awad; Xavier Baron; Isabelle Garcin-Marrou; Renaud de La Brosse, sociologue).; Université de la Sorbonne Nouvelle (Paris).; École doctorale Arts et médias (Paris).; Communication, information, médias (Paris). |
OCLC Number: | 880309140 |
Notes: | Titre provenant de l'écran-titre. |
Description: | 1 online resource |
Responsibility: | Amal Nader ; sous la direction de Michael Beaussenat Palmer. |
Abstract:
The main purpose of this thesis is to study, peace negotiations between Lebanon,Syria and Israel from 1991 to 2000, via their coverage in two Lebanese news papers An-Naharand As-Safir. This was a tense period in the recent history of Lebanon; it was marked by thepolitical influence of Syria on Lebanon, and a strategic period during which the peace processbetween Israel and Arab countries began. It consists primarily in an analysis of the changingnature of the coverage and discourse of two major Lebanese daily newspapers - An-Nahar andAs-Safir. The “copy” here analyzed related to a sensitive geopolitical issue affecting Lebanese independence and relations between Syria and Israel. The survey spans à decade: it is limited to front-page coverage of each newspaper. In order to examine the subject scientifically, aspecific software was specially designed and developed for this purpose. A matrix fororganizing and analyzing textual information and media production was devised. First thestudy was affected horizontally, in order to compare various actors and their related newspaper coverage. Then the study was elaborated in a vertical manner, i.e. by handlingeach newspaper and each author separately, in order to establish the evolution of different discourse. This was achieved by cross-comparing differences and similarities in the discourse,and constants and variables over time.
Reviews

