Find a copy in the library
Finding libraries that hold this item...
Details
Document Type: | Book |
---|---|
All Authors / Contributors: |
Armin von Bogdandy; Ingo Venzke; Thomas Dunlap |
ISBN: | 9780198717461 0198717466 9780198784418 0198784414 |
OCLC Number: | 1088168404 |
Notes: | Jogeset mutató: p. [xi]-xxi. |
Description: | lv, 269 p. |
Contents: | Postscript to the Paperback Edition1: Agenda and objectives2: Basic conceptions of international courts3: Key elements of a public law theory of adjudication4: Pathways of democratic legitimacy5: In whose name? |
Series Title: | International Courts and Tribunals series |
Other Titles: | In wessen Namen? |
Responsibility: | Armin von Bogdandy and Ingo Venzke ; translated from the German by Thomas Dunlap and revised by the authors. |
Reviews
Publisher Synopsis
The international law study In Whose Name contributes to the theory of global governance with rare analytical clarity. This book will quickly become unavoidable reading. Thanks to this work, the cosmopolitical landscape will be accessible for legal lay persons. * Elisabeth von Thadden, Die Zeit * In their dedicated work the two authors find that the received function of international courts as inter-state dispute settlers has been significantly expanded. Von Bogdandy and Venzke succeed in striking a comprehensible tone, which shows the consequences [of international adjudication] for the lives of the readers. * Berthold Merkle, Neue Zuricher Zeitung * The expansive growth and influence of international courts, tribunals, and quasi-judicial bodies (ICTs) fuels well deserved interest across disciplines far beyond public international law, including political science and political philosophy. How are we to describe, explain, and assess this partial abdication of sovereignty by the main actors of a (formerly) state-centric world order? Armin von Bogdandy and Ingo Venzke have again joined forces to illuminate theseprofound issues of the functions and legitimacy of ICTs, tying together and expanding on previous valuable insights. * Andreas Follesdal, Opinio Juris * Read more...

