skip to content
The politics of local participatory democracy in Latin America : institutions, actors, and interactions Preview this item
ClosePreview this item

The politics of local participatory democracy in Latin America : institutions, actors, and interactions

Author: Françoise Montambeault
Publisher: Stanford, California : Stanford University Press, cop. 2016, cop. 2016.
Edition/Format:   Print book : EnglishView all editions and formats

(not yet rated) 0 with reviews - Be the first.

More like this

Find a copy in the library

&AllPage.SpinnerRetrieving; Finding libraries that hold this item...


Genre/Form: Case studies
Études de cas
Document Type: Book
All Authors / Contributors: Françoise Montambeault
ISBN: 9780804795166 0804795169
OCLC Number: 930288226
Notes: Ed. en réalité en 2015.
Description: 1 vol. (XVI-265 p.) : couv. ill. en coul. ; 24 cm
Contents: Contents and Abstracts1Introduction chapter abstractThe Introduction sets up the theoretical and empirical puzzles of the book. In Mexico and Brazil, participatory democracy reforms have been implemented as part of an emerging democratizing discourse among political parties to which citizen participation was central. In practice, however, these reforms have had mixed results, between countries and also between municipalities within a single country, as in the case of Mexico and Brazil. How do we explain success? And more important, how do we define success? The Introduction poses the debate around these two questions, presenting the theoretical arguments developed and the novel comparative method used to empirically demonstrate these arguments.2How Does Success Vary? Redefining Democratic Success chapter abstractChapter 2 makes the case for a redefinition of the democratic success of local participatory democracy, determined by the nature of the state-society relationships that develop through formal and informal participatory interactions. The chapter presents a typology to account for variation along the two defining dimensions of state-society relationships: the nature of mobilization (from individual to collective forms) and the level of autonomy of the participants (from controlled to autonomous). It defines the four ideal types used throughout the book to categorize the diversity of empirical outcomes observed across cases: clientelism, disempowering cooption, fragmented inclusion, and democratic cooperation.3Why Do Cases Vary? A Comparative Approach chapter abstractChapter 3 presents the four cities selected in greater detail, exploring existing explanations for variations in success by emphasizing the cases' historical and institutional similarities. It offers a framework for explaining the various state-society relationship outcomes; defining the indicators for a series of cultural, institutional, and agency-related factors that, combined and in interaction with one another, can explain variation along both the mobilization and the autonomy dimensions of state-society relationships across and within cases.4Ciudad Nezahualcoyotl: Participatory Democracy or Clientelistic Participation? chapter abstractChapter 4 shows that the case of participatory planning in Nezahualcoyotl closely corresponds to the ideal type of clientelism. The persistence of this traditional type of state-society relationship in the city despite the existence of formal participatory channels is explained by two factors. First, a tendency of institutional design to encourage individual and particularistic forms of mobilization is observed. Second, the local sociopolitical context-characterized by high political competition among and within parties and an imbalance of civil society organizations engaged in the process that maintain unequal understanding of state and society actors' roles in the process-contributes to maintenance of control strategies in participatory mechanisms that, in turn, undermine the autonomy of civil society participants.5Leon: Participation as Fragmented Inclusion chapter abstractChapter 5 shows that the case of participatory planning in Leon corresponds to the ideal type of fragmented inclusion. The development of such a relationship is explained by two main elements. First, the case points to a tendency of the chosen institutional design to encourage individual forms of mobilization, organized around particularistic demands. Second, the sociopolitical context characterized by a relatively stable situation of political competition among and within parties and by participation of all sectors of civil society tends to encourage development of a partnership understanding of the state's and society's roles in the participatory process and to minimize the use of control strategies and open up possibilities for increased autonomy among participants.6Recife: From Clientelism to Disempowering Co-option chapter abstractChapter 6 moves the analysis to the case of Recife, in Brazil. This city presents two cases in one, and as such allows a unique time-based comparison that adds to the space-based comparisons undertaken throughout the book. The chapter shows that Recife's two distinct experiences of participatory budgeting, implemented under different local governments, reveal contrasting patterns of state-society relationships: the first one (1993-2000 under a PMDB/PFL coalition) closely corresponds to an ideal type of clientelism, while the other one (2001-2009, under the PT) has the characteristics of disempowering co-option. These varying outcomes thus represent a variation on the mobilization axis, which is best explained by the important changes introduced in the institutional design by the PT in 2001. The sociopolitical context, however, sustained an unequal partnership and political control practices in both experiences.7Belo Horizonte: The Route Toward Democratic Cooperation? chapter abstractChapter 7 presents the most successful case, Belo Horizonte, showing how it more closely corresponds to a case of democratic success, with democratic cooperation emerging between state and society actors. This is best explained by two main elements. On the one hand, the institutional design adopted in Belo Horizonte fostered collective organization of groups of citizens to define the common good. On the other hand, the sociopolitical context within which the process was implemented fostered the autonomy of participants and, rather than sustain strategies of political control, led to development of an equal partnership (understood as such) between state and society actors in the participatory process.8Conclusion: Comparative Lessons for Participatory Democracy Theory chapter abstractChapter 8 places the conclusions in a comparative perspective, highlighting the theoretical and policy lessons that can be learned from the five empirical cases presented in the book. It then explores the differentiated consequences each type has for the deepening of local democratic practices in governance processes, highlighting the limits and potential of each model as well as discussing the implications for the quality of democracy and its procedures, processes, and policy outcomes. The chapter discusses the theoretical implications of the findings for the study of institutional reform, civic engagement, and democratization, and also the policy implications for the policy makers and politicians who lead such types of participatory democracy reforms throughout Latin America, as well as in municipalities around the world.
Responsibility: Françoise Montambeault.


Editorial reviews

Publisher Synopsis

Montambeault's outstanding book provides us with a much-needed account of the relationship between participatory democracy and deepening democracy. Far from looking at civil society and participatory Read more...

User-contributed reviews
Retrieving GoodReads reviews...
Retrieving DOGObooks reviews...


Be the first.
Confirm this request

You may have already requested this item. Please select Ok if you would like to proceed with this request anyway.

Linked Data

Primary Entity

<> # The politics of local participatory democracy in Latin America : institutions, actors, and interactions
    a schema:CreativeWork, schema:Book ;
   library:oclcnum "930288226" ;
   library:placeOfPublication <> ; # Stanford, California
   library:placeOfPublication <> ;
   schema:about <> ; # Democracy--Brazil
   schema:about <> ; # Démocratie locale--Brésil--Études de cas
   schema:about <> ; # Local government--Brazil--Citizen participation
   schema:about <> ;
   schema:about <> ; # Démocratie locale--Mexique--Études de cas
   schema:about <> ; # Démocratie locale--Brésil
   schema:about <> ; # Administration locale--Mexique--Participation des citoyens
   schema:about <> ; # Mexico
   schema:about <> ; # Brazil
   schema:about <> ; # Local government--Mexico--Citizen participation
   schema:about <> ; # Collectivités locales--Brésil--Participation des citoyens--Études de cas
   schema:about <> ; # Démocratie locale--Mexique
   schema:about <> ; # Mexiko
   schema:about <> ; # Administration locale--Brésil--Participation des citoyens
   schema:about <> ; # Brasilien
   schema:about <> ; # Democracy--Mexico
   schema:about <> ; # Local government--Citizen participation
   schema:about <> ; # Democracy
   schema:author <> ; # Françoise Montambeault
   schema:bookFormat bgn:PrintBook ;
   schema:copyrightYear "2016" ;
   schema:copyrightYear "op." ;
   schema:datePublished "2016" ;
   schema:exampleOfWork <> ;
   schema:genre "Case studies" ;
   schema:inLanguage "en" ;
   schema:name "The politics of local participatory democracy in Latin America : institutions, actors, and interactions" ;
   schema:productID "930288226" ;
   schema:publication <> ;
   schema:publisher <> ; # Stanford University Press
   schema:workExample <> ;
   wdrs:describedby <> ;

Related Entities

<> # Stanford University Press
    a bgn:Agent ;
   schema:name "Stanford University Press" ;

<> # Françoise Montambeault
    a schema:Person ;
   schema:familyName "Montambeault" ;
   schema:givenName "Françoise" ;
   schema:name "Françoise Montambeault" ;

<> # Stanford, California
    a schema:Place ;
   schema:name "Stanford, California" ;

<> # Administration locale--Brésil--Participation des citoyens
    a schema:Intangible ;
   schema:name "Administration locale--Brésil--Participation des citoyens"@fr ;

<> # Administration locale--Mexique--Participation des citoyens
    a schema:Intangible ;
   schema:name "Administration locale--Mexique--Participation des citoyens"@fr ;

<> # Collectivités locales--Brésil--Participation des citoyens--Études de cas
    a schema:Intangible ;
   schema:name "Collectivités locales--Brésil--Participation des citoyens--Études de cas" ;

<> # Démocratie locale--Brésil
    a schema:Intangible ;
   schema:name "Démocratie locale--Brésil"@fr ;

<> # Démocratie locale--Brésil--Études de cas
    a schema:Intangible ;
   schema:name "Démocratie locale--Brésil--Études de cas" ;

<> # Démocratie locale--Mexique
    a schema:Intangible ;
   schema:name "Démocratie locale--Mexique"@fr ;

<> # Démocratie locale--Mexique--Études de cas
    a schema:Intangible ;
   schema:name "Démocratie locale--Mexique--Études de cas" ;

<> # Local government--Brazil--Citizen participation
    a schema:Intangible ;
   schema:name "Local government--Brazil--Citizen participation" ;

<> # Local government--Citizen participation
    a schema:Intangible ;
   schema:name "Local government--Citizen participation" ;

<> # Local government--Mexico--Citizen participation
    a schema:Intangible ;
   schema:name "Local government--Mexico--Citizen participation" ;

    a schema:ProductModel ;
   schema:isbn "0804795169" ;
   schema:isbn "9780804795166" ;

    a genont:InformationResource, genont:ContentTypeGenericResource ;
   schema:about <> ; # The politics of local participatory democracy in Latin America : institutions, actors, and interactions
   schema:dateModified "2018-11-08" ;
   void:inDataset <> ;

Content-negotiable representations

Close Window

Please sign in to WorldCat 

Don't have an account? You can easily create a free account.