Find a copy in the library
Finding libraries that hold this item...
Details
Genre/Form: | Thèses et écrits académiques |
---|---|
Material Type: | Document, Thesis/dissertation |
Document Type: | Computer File |
All Authors / Contributors: |
Agnieska Stys; Cécile Bouton; Pawel Lipinski; Jacek A Modlinski; Josef Dulak; Jean-Marc Moulis; Grzegorz Bartosz; Université Paris-Sud (1970-2019).; Polish Academy of Sciences, Institute of Genetics and Animal Breeding.; École doctorale Signalisations et réseaux intégratifs en biologie (Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, Val-de-Marne / 2000-2015).; Institut de chimie des substances naturelles (Gif-sur-Yvette, Essonne / 1959-....). |
OCLC Number: | 800911751 |
Notes: | Thèse soutenue en co-tutelle. Titre provenant de l'écran-titre. |
Description: | 1 online resource |
Responsibility: | Agnieska Stys ; sous la direction de Cécile Bouton et de Pawel Lipinski. |
Abstract:
Iron Regulatory Protein 1 (IRP1) and 2 (IRP2) are two cytosolic regulators of mammalian cellular iron homeostasis. IRPs post-transcriptionally modulate expression of iron-related genes by binding to specific sequences, called Iron Regulatory Elements (IREs), located in the untranslated regions (UTR) of mRNAs. Either of the two IRPs inhibits translation when bound to the single 5'UTR IRE in the mRNA encoding proteins of iron export (ferroportin - Fpn) and storage (ferritin - Ft) or prevents mRNA degradationwhen bound to the multiple IREs within the 3'UTR of the mRNA encoding the transferrinreceptor 1 (TfR1) - iron uptake molecule. The IRE-binding activity of both IRPs respondsto cellular iron levels, albeit via distinct mechanisms. IRP1 is a bifunctional protein, whichmostly exists in its non IRE-binding, [4Fe-4S] aconitase form and can be regulated by apost-translational incorporation or removal of the Fe-S cluster. In contrast to IRP1, IRP2 isnot able to ligate an Fe-S cluster, and its IRE-binding activity is determined by the rate ofits proteasomal degradation. Although both IRP1 and IRP2 can regulate cellular ironhomeostasis, only mice lacking IRP2 were shown to display iron mismanagement in mosttissues. This could be explained by the fact that IRP1 exists mostly in its non IRE-binding,aconitase form under physiological oxygen conditions (3-6%). Interestingly, nitric oxide(NO), an important signalling molecule involved in immune defence, targets the Fe-Scluster of IRP1 in both normoxia and hypoxia, and converts IRP1 from aconitase to anIRE-binding form. It has also been reported that IRP2 could sense NO, but the intrinsicfunction of IRP1 and IRP2 in NO-mediated regulation of cellular iron metabolism hasremained a matter of controversy. In this study, we took advantage of mouse models ofIRP deficiency to define the respective role of IRP1 and IRP2 in the regulation of cellulariron metabolism by NO and assess the contribution of oxygen tension on the regulation.Therefore, we exposed bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMMs) from Irp1-/-, Irp2-/- andmacrophage specific double knockout mosaic mice (Irp1/2-/-) to exogenous andendogenous NO under different oxygen conditions (21% O2 for normoxia and 3-5% forhypoxia experiments) and measured IRPs activities, iron-related genes expression andactivity of Fe-S cluster protein - mitochondrial aconitase. We showed that in normoxia, thegenerated apo-form of IRP1 by NO was entirely responsible for the post-transcriptionalregulation of TfR1, H-Ft, L-Ft and Fpn. Moreover, by increasing iron uptake and reducingiron sequestration and export, NO-dependent IRP1 activation served to maintainadequate levels of intracellular iron in order to fuel the Fe-S biosynthetic pathway, asdemonstrated by the efficient restoration of the mitochondrial Fe-S aconitase, which wasprevented under IRP1 deficiency. Furthermore, activated IRP1 was potent enough todown-regulate the abnormally increased L-Ft and H-Ft protein levels in Irp2-/-macrophages. Endogenous NO activated IRP1 IRE-binding activity and tended todecrease IRP2 IRE-binding activity. Nevertheless, IRP1 was the predominant regulator offerritin in those conditions. In hypoxia, in Irp1+/+ and Irp2+/+ macrophages exposed to NO,both stabilized IRP2 and NO-activated IRP1 seemed to cooperate to inhibit ferritinsynthesis. However, in Irp1-/- cells, IRP2 stabilized in hypoxia was sufficient to inhibit LandH-Ft synthesis despite the concomitant increase of corresponding mRNAs.Interestingly, TfR1 was shown to be predominantly regulated at the transcriptional level byNO in hypoxia, in which HIF-1 alpha may be the critical regulator. In conclusion, we revealin this study how the IRP regulon participates in the regulation of cellular iron metabolismin response to NO and its intimate interplay with the oxygen pathway. The findingsunderlie the importance to further explore the role of IRP1 in inflammation in vivo, in nonhypoxictissue microenvironments.
Reviews

