Find a copy online
Links to this item
Find a copy in the library
Finding libraries that hold this item...
Details
Genre/Form: | Electronic books |
---|---|
Material Type: | Document, Internet resource |
Document Type: | Internet Resource, Computer File |
All Authors / Contributors: |
Rahul Sagar |
ISBN: | 9781400880850 1400880858 |
OCLC Number: | 1100671456 |
Description: | 1 online resource |
Contents: | Frontmatter -- Contents -- Preface to the Paperback Edition -- Acknowledgments -- Introduction. Who Watches the Watchers? -- Chapter 1. The Problem: How to Regulate State Secrecy? -- Chapter 2. Should We Rely on Judges? Transparency and the Problem of Judicial Deference -- Chapter 3. Should We Rely on Congress? Oversight and the Problem of Executive Privilege -- Chapter 4. Should the Law Condone Unauthorized Disclosures? Fire Alarms and the Problem of Legitimacy -- Chapter 5. Should We Rely on Whistleblowers? Disobedience and the Problem of Retaliation -- Chapter 6. Should We Trust Leakers? Anonymous Sources and the Problem of Regulation -- Conclusion. Bitter Medicine -- Notes -- Selected Bibliography -- Index |
Responsibility: | Rahul Sagar. |
Abstract:
Secrets and Leaks examines the complex relationships among executive power, national security, and secrecy. State secrecy is vital for national security, but it can also be used to conceal wrongdoing. How then can we ensure that this power is used responsibly? Typically, the onus is put on lawmakers and judges, who are expected to oversee the executive. Yet because these actors lack access to the relevant information and the ability to determine the harm likely to be caused by its disclosure, they often defer to the executive's claims about the need for secrecy. As a result, potential abuses are more often exposed by unauthorized disclosures published in the press. But should such disclosures, which violate the law, be condoned? Drawing on several cases, Rahul Sagar argues that though whistleblowing can be morally justified, the fear of retaliation usually prompts officials to act anonymously--that is, to "leak" information. As a result, it becomes difficult for the public to discern when an unauthorized disclosure is intended to further partisan interests. Because such disclosures are the only credible means of checking the executive, Sagar writes, they must be tolerated, and, at times, even celebrated. However, the public should treat such disclosures skeptically and subject irresponsible journalism to concerted criticism.
Reviews
User-contributed reviews
Add a review and share your thoughts with other readers.
Be the first.
Add a review and share your thoughts with other readers.
Be the first.


Tags
Add tags for "Secrets and leaks : the dilemma of state secrecy".
Be the first.
Similar Items
Related Subjects:(9)
- Whistle blowing -- Political aspects.
- Leaks (Disclosure of information)
- Official secrets.
- Alerte professionnelle -- Aspect politique.
- Fuites (Divulgation d'informations)
- Secrets d'État.
- POLITICAL SCIENCE / Political Freedom & Security / International Security.
- POLITICAL SCIENCE / Government / Executive Branch.
- POLITICAL SCIENCE / History & Theory.