When Are Women More Effective Lawmakers Than Men? (Article, 2013) [WorldCat.org]
skip to content
When Are Women More Effective Lawmakers Than Men?
ClosePreview this item

When Are Women More Effective Lawmakers Than Men?

Author: Craig Volden Affiliation: University of Virginia; Alan E Wiseman Affiliation: Vanderbilt University; Dana E Wittmer Affiliation: Colorado College
Edition/Format: Article Article : English
Publication:American Journal of Political Science, v57 n2 (April 2013): 326-341
Other Databases: WorldCatWorldCat

(not yet rated) 0 with reviews - Be the first.


Find a copy online

Links to this journal/publication

Find a copy in the library

&AllPage.SpinnerRetrieving; Finding libraries that hold this item...


Document Type: Article
All Authors / Contributors: Craig Volden Affiliation: University of Virginia; Alan E Wiseman Affiliation: Vanderbilt University; Dana E Wittmer Affiliation: Colorado College
Language Note: English
Unique Identifier: 5153813803
Notes: Craig Volden is Professor of Politics and Public Policy, Frank Batten School of Leadership and Public Policy, University of Virginia, 203 Garrett Hall, P.O. Box 400893, Charlottesville, VA 22904-4893 (volden@virginia.edu). Alan E. Wiseman is Associate Professor of Political Science and Law (by Courtesy), Vanderbilt University, 230 Appleton Place, PMB 0505, Nashville, TN 37203-5721 (alan.wiseman@vanderbilt.edu). Dana E. Wittmer is Assistant Professor of Political Science, Colorado College, 14 E. Cache La Poudre, Colorado Springs, CO 80909 (dana.wittmer@coloradocollege.edu).
Number of Figures: 2
Number of Tables: 3
Number of Formulas: 1
Number of References: 50
• Differences by Party Affiliation or Party Control?
• Robustness to Exclusion of Lagged Dependent Variable
• Exploring the Effect of Amendment Activities
Table S1: Partisan Determinants of Women's Effectiveness?
Table S2: Determinants of Legislative Effectiveness (Excluding Lagged LES)
Table S3: Determinants of Legislative Effectiveness (Controlling for Amendment Activity)
The authors thank Claire Abernathy, Chris Berry, Janet Boles, Kimberly Beth Cowell-Meyers, Kathy Dolan, Juanita Firestone, Matt Hitt, Chris Kypriotis, Lauren Mattioli, William Minozzi, Beth Reingold, Kira Sanbonmatsu, Lynn Sanders, Michele Swers, Andrew Taylor, Sean Theriault, Sophie Trawalter, Denise Walsh, and seminar participants at the University of Virginia for helpful comments on earlier drafts, and James Austrow, Tracy Burdett, Chris Kypriotis, and Brian Pokosh for valuable research assistance. This project also benefited from the use of Scott Adler and John Wilkerson's Congressional Bills Project data, Frank Baumgartner and Bryan Jones's Policy Agendas Project data, and Keith Poole and Howard Rosenthal's Nominate data. Replication data for this article are available at http://dvn.iq.harvard.edu/dvn/dv/ajps/faces/study/StudyPage.xhtml?globalId=hdl:1902.1/18911.


Previous scholarship has demonstrated that female lawmakers differ from their male counterparts by engaging more fully in consensus-building activities. We argue that this behavioral difference does not serve women equally well in all institutional settings. Contentious and partisan activities of male lawmakers may help them outperform women when in a polarized majority party. However, in the minority party, while men may choose to obstruct and delay, women continue to strive to build coalitions and bring about new policies. We find strong evidence that minority party women in the U.S. House of Representatives are better able to keep their sponsored bills alive through later stages of the legislative process than are minority party men, across the 93rd-110th Congresses (1973-2008). The opposite is true for majority party women, however, who counterbalance this lack of later success by introducing more legislation. Moreover, while the legislative style of minority party women has served them well consistently across the past four decades, majority party women have become less effective as Congress has become more polarized.


User-contributed reviews
Retrieving GoodReads reviews...
Retrieving DOGObooks reviews...


Be the first.
Confirm this request

You may have already requested this item. Please select Ok if you would like to proceed with this request anyway.

Close Window

Please sign in to WorldCat 

Don't have an account? You can easily create a free account.