WHEN THE WOLF TENDS THE FLOCK: CLERGY MISCONDUCT AND MARITAL COUNSELING (Article, 1994) [WorldCat.org]
skip to content
WHEN THE WOLF TENDS THE FLOCK: CLERGY MISCONDUCT AND MARITAL COUNSELING
ClosePreview this item
Checking...

WHEN THE WOLF TENDS THE FLOCK: CLERGY MISCONDUCT AND MARITAL COUNSELING

Author: D V White
Edition/Format: Article Article : English
Publication:Illinois Bar Journal, v82 n4 (April 1994): 194- 196, 223
Summary:
Regarding constitutional issues in alleged clergy misconduct, the courts have held that when the alleged wrongdoing of a cleric falls outside the beliefs and doctrine of the cleric's religion, there is no protection from the First Amendment. Cases arising out of clergy misconduct have also been subjected to an establishment clause analysis. The leading test for determining whether state action has violated the  Read more...
Rating:

(not yet rated) 0 with reviews - Be the first.

&AllPage.SpinnerRetrieving;

Find a copy in the library

We were unable to get information about libraries that hold this item.

Details

Document Type: Article
All Authors / Contributors: D V White
Language Note: English
Unique Identifier: 4769363065
Notes: ANNOTATION: This article examines constitutional considerations and potential causes of civil action in cases of clergy misconduct in the context of marital counseling.
Awards:

Abstract:

Regarding constitutional issues in alleged clergy misconduct, the courts have held that when the alleged wrongdoing of a cleric falls outside the beliefs and doctrine of the cleric's religion, there is no protection from the First Amendment. Cases arising out of clergy misconduct have also been subjected to an establishment clause analysis. The leading test for determining whether state action has violated the establishment clause was presented in Lemon v. Kurtzman. In this case, the three- pronged test requires that the state action have a secular purpose, its principal effect be neither to advance nor inhibit religion, and it does not foster excessive state entanglement with religion. Cases that have arisen out of clergy misconduct within the marital counseling relationship have been premised on a variety of theories. These include clergy malpractice, counseling malpractice, and breach of fiduciary duty. Although clergy malpractice and counseling malpractice suits have generally failed, traditional tort theories, which have long proved adaptable to new facts, hold greater promise. These theories present the least likelihood of state entanglement with religion and provide a familiar framework within which courts can work. 70 notes

Reviews

User-contributed reviews
Retrieving GoodReads reviews...
Retrieving DOGObooks reviews...

Tags

Be the first.
Confirm this request

You may have already requested this item. Please select Ok if you would like to proceed with this request anyway.

Close Window

Please sign in to WorldCat 

Don't have an account? You can easily create a free account.