skip to content
Where the Conflict Really Lies : Science, Religion, and Naturalism Preview this item
ClosePreview this item
Checking...

Where the Conflict Really Lies : Science, Religion, and Naturalism

Author: Alvin Plantinga Affiliation: University of Notre Dame
Publisher: New York Oxford University Press 2011-12-09
Edition/Format: Book Book : English
Database:Oxford Scholarship Online
Summary:
This book is a long-awaited major statement by a pre-eminent analytic philosopher, on one of our biggest debates—the compatibility of science and religion. The last twenty years has seen a cottage industry of books on this divide, but with little consensus emerging. This book's author, as a top philosopher but also a proponent of the rationality of religious belief, has a unique contribution to make. The theme of  Read more...
Rating:

(not yet rated) 0 with reviews - Be the first.

More like this

 

Find a copy online

Links to this item

Find a copy in the library

We were unable to get information about libraries that hold this item.

Details

Document Type: Book
All Authors / Contributors: Alvin Plantinga Affiliation: University of Notre Dame
ISBN: 9780199812097 0199812098 9780199928590 0199928592
Language Note: English
Unique Identifier: 5105636417
Awards:
Description: 336 Pages

Abstract:

This book is a long-awaited major statement by a pre-eminent analytic philosopher, on one of our biggest debates—the compatibility of science and religion. The last twenty years has seen a cottage industry of books on this divide, but with little consensus emerging. This book's author, as a top philosopher but also a proponent of the rationality of religious belief, has a unique contribution to make. The theme of this short book is that the conflict between science and theistic religion is actually superficial, and that at a deeper level they are in concord. The book examines where this conflict is supposed to exist—evolution, evolutionary psychology, analysis of scripture, scientific study of religion—as well as claims by Dan Dennett, Richard Dawkins, and Philip Kitcher that evolution and theistic belief cannot co-exist. The book makes a case that their arguments are not only inconclusive but that the supposed conflicts themselves are superficial, due to the methodological naturalism used by science. On the other hand, science can actually offer support to theistic doctrines, and the text uses the notion of biological and cosmological “fine-tuning” in support of this idea. The book argues that we might think about arguments in science and religion in a new way—as different forms of discourse that try to persuade people to look at questions from a perspective such that they can see that something is true. In this way, there is a deep and massive consonance between theism and the scientific enterprise.

Reviews

User-contributed reviews
Retrieving GoodReads reviews...
Retrieving DOGObooks reviews...

Tags

Be the first.

Similar Items

User lists with this item (1)

Confirm this request

You may have already requested this item. Please select Ok if you would like to proceed with this request anyway.

Linked Data


<http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/5105636417>
library:oclcnum"5105636417"
library:placeOfPublication
owl:sameAs<info:oclcnum/5105636417>
rdf:typeschema:Book
schema:creator
schema:datePublished"2011/12/09"
schema:datePublished"2011-12-09"
schema:description"This book is a long-awaited major statement by a pre-eminent analytic philosopher, on one of our biggest debates—the compatibility of science and religion. The last twenty years has seen a cottage industry of books on this divide, but with little consensus emerging. This book's author, as a top philosopher but also a proponent of the rationality of religious belief, has a unique contribution to make. The theme of this short book is that the conflict between science and theistic religion is actually superficial, and that at a deeper level they are in concord. The book examines where this conflict is supposed to exist—evolution, evolutionary psychology, analysis of scripture, scientific study of religion—as well as claims by Dan Dennett, Richard Dawkins, and Philip Kitcher that evolution and theistic belief cannot co-exist. The book makes a case that their arguments are not only inconclusive but that the supposed conflicts themselves are superficial, due to the methodological naturalism used by science. On the other hand, science can actually offer support to theistic doctrines, and the text uses the notion of biological and cosmological “fine-tuning” in support of this idea. The book argues that we might think about arguments in science and religion in a new way—as different forms of discourse that try to persuade people to look at questions from a perspective such that they can see that something is true. In this way, there is a deep and massive consonance between theism and the scientific enterprise."
schema:exampleOfWork<http://worldcat.org/entity/work/id/1331485992>
schema:isPartOf
schema:name"Where the Conflict Really Lies : Science, Religion, and Naturalism"
schema:publisher
schema:sameAs<http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199812097.001.0001>
schema:url
schema:url<http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199812097.001.0001/acprof-9780199812097>
schema:workExample
schema:workExample

Content-negotiable representations

Close Window

Please sign in to WorldCat 

Don't have an account? You can easily create a free account.